Skip to main content

Adaptive Multi-agent Decision Making Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2557))

Abstract

In multi-agent decision-making problems, we should treat all the participating agents with no partiality. In this paper, we seek to elicit the cooperation level from each agent’s inner world. This benefit would be gained by the reasonable preference values to each alternative in the viewpoint of the group. Besides, we propose a methodology to adapt group’s preference functions. It can make all the participating agents have the chances to pick up the most favorite choice after several rounds of decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B.A. Akash, R. Mamlook, M.S. Mohsen, “Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process,” Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 52, 1999, pp. 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.M. Gupta, J. Qi, “Theory of T-norm and Fuzzy Inference Methods,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1991, pp. 431–450.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.C. Hayes, “Agents in a Nutshell — A Very Brief Introduction,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1999, pp. 127–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. P.K. Hye, F. Joël, “Virtual Enterprise-Information System and Networking Solution,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 37, Issue: 1-2, 1999, pp. 441–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L.C. Leung, D. Cao, “On Consistency and Ranking of Alternatives in Fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2000, pp. 102–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. N.F. Matsatsinis, A.P. Samaras, “MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, 2001, pp. 414–429.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D.A. Roozemond, “Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 131, 2001, pp. 293–301.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. T.L. Saaty, L.G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.R. Yager, “Penalizing Strategic Preference Manipulation in Multi-Agent Decision Making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2001, pp. 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Juei-Nan, C., Yueh-Min, H., Chu, W.C. (2002). Adaptive Multi-agent Decision Making Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. In: McKay, B., Slaney, J. (eds) AI 2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2557. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36187-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36187-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36187-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics