Skip to main content

Classes with Easily Learnable Subclasses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2533))

Abstract

Let Ex denote the explanatory model of learning [3],[5]. Various more restrictive models have been studied in the literature, an example is finite identification [5]. The topic of the present paper are the natural variants (a) and (b) below of the classical question whether a given learning criteria is more restrictive than Ex-learning. (a) Does every infinite Ex-identifiable class have an infinite subclass which can be identified according to a given restrictive criterion? (b) If an infinite Exidentifiable class S has an infinite finitely identifiable subclass, does it necessarily follow that some appropriate learner Ex-identifies S as well as finitely identifies an infinite subclass of S? These questions are also treated in the context of ordinal mind change bounds.

Sanjay Jain was supported in part by NUS grant number R252-000-127-112.

Frank Stephan was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Heisenberg grant Ste 967/1-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Janis Bārzdinņš. Inductive inference of automata, functions and programs. In Int. Math. Congress, Vancouver, pages 771–776, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lenore Blum and Manuel Blum. Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 28:125–155, 1975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. John Case and Carl Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 25:193–220, 1983.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Rūsinņš Freivalds and Carl Smith. On the role of procrastination in machine learning. Information and Computation, 107:237–271, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Mark Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447–474, 1967.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Paul R. Halmos. Naive Set Theory. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanjay Jain, Daniel Osherson, James S. Royer and Arun Sharma. Systems that Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., second edition, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eliana Minicozzi. Some natural properties of strong identification in inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 2:345–360, 1976.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Piergiorgio Odifreddi. Classical Recursion Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Piergiorgio Odifreddi. Classical Recursion Theory, volume II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel Osherson, Michael Stob and Scott Weinstein. Systems that Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert Soare. Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees. Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rolf Wiehagen and Walter Liepe. Charakteristische Eigenschaften von erkennbaren Klassen rekursiver Funktionen. Journal of Information Processing and Cybernetics (EIK), 12:421–438, 1976.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, S., Menzel, W., Stephan, F. (2002). Classes with Easily Learnable Subclasses. In: Cesa-Bianchi, N., Numao, M., Reischuk, R. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2533. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36169-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36169-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00170-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36169-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics