Skip to main content

Computer Simulations of Opinions and their Reactions to Extreme Events

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Summary

We review the opinion dynamics in the computer models of Deffuant et al. (D), of Krause and Hegselmann (KH), and of Sznajd (S). All of these models allow for consensus (one final opinion), polarization (two final opinions), and fragmentation (more than two final opinions), depending on how tolerant people are to different opinions. We then simulate the reactions of people to Xevents, in that we modify the opinion of an individual and investigate how the dynamics of a consensus model diffuses this perturbation among the other members of a community. It often happens that the original shock induced by the Xevent influences the opinion of a large part of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Geipel, R. Härta, J. Pohl: Risiken im Mittelrheinischen Becken. In: International Decade for Natural Disaster, Reduction IDNDR, German IDNDR Series 4, ISBN 3-9805232-5-X, Deutsches IDNDR Komitee für Katastrophenvorbeugung, Bonn (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch: Adv. Compl. Syst. 3, 87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, T. Faure: J. Artif. Soc. Social Sim. 5, issue 4, paper 1 (jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Weisbuch: Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 339 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Amblard, G. Deffuant: Physica A 343, 725 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause: J. Artif. Soc. Social Sim. 5, issue 3, paper 2 (jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. U. Krause, in: Modellierung und Simulation von Dynamiken mit vielen interagierenden Akteuren, ed. by U. Krause, M. Stöckler, Bremen University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. P.I. Krapivsky, S. Redner: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 238701 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L.R. Fontes, R.H. Schonmann, V. Sidoravicius: Comm. Math. Phys. 228, 495 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Axelrod: J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Galam: J. Stat. Phys. 61, 943 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Galam: Physica A 336, 56 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Wu, B.A. Huberman: Social Structure and Opinion Formation, condmat/0407252 at www.arXiv.org

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Stauffer: AIP Conf. Proc. 690, 147 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Ben-Naim, P. Krapivsky, S. Redner: Physica D 183, 190 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard: Physica A 353, 555 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Galam, S. Moscovici: Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21, 49 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T.C. Schelling: J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Albert, A.L. Barabási: Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Stauffer, H. Meyer-Ortmanns: Int. J. Mod. Phy. C 15, 241 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Stauffer, A. Aharony: Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor and Francis, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Stauffer, A.O. Sousa, C. Schulze: J. Artif. Soc. Social Sim. 7, issue 3, paper 7 (jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Fortunato: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 1301 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Assmann: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 1439 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. A.O. Sousa: cond-mat/0406766 at www.arXiv.org

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Bonnekoh: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 14, 1231 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Fortunato: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 1021 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Stauffer: Comput. Sci. Eng. 5, 71 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Fortunato: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 259 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause: Opinion Dynamics Driven by Various Ways of Averaging, Universität Bayreuth (2004), Computational Economics 25, 381 (2005); available at http://pe.uni-bayreuth.de/?coid=18

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. M. He, H. Xu, Q. Sun: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 947 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. A.T. Bernardes, D. Stauffer, J. Kertész: Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 123 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. M.C. Gonzalez, A.O. Sousa, H.J. Herrmann: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 45 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Schulze: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 569 and 867 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. F. Slanina, H. Lavicka: Eur. Phys. J. B 35, 279 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. He, B. Li, L. Luo: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 997 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. J.J. Schneider: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 659 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Fortunato: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 17 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. S.A. Kauffman: J. Theor. Biol. 22, 437 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Creutz: Ann. Phys. 167, 62 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. H.E. Stanley, D. Stauffer, J. Kertész, H.J. Herrmann: Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2326 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. A.T. Bernardes, U.M.S. Costa, A.D. Araujo, D. Stauffer: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 159 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B. Roehner, D. Sornette, J.V. Andersen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 809 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. N. Klietsch: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 577 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. A.L. Barabási, R. Albert: Science 286, 509 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Fortunato: Physica A 348, 683 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Jacobmeier: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 644 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Center for Frontier Sciences

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fortunato, S., Stauffer, D. (2006). Computer Simulations of Opinions and their Reactions to Extreme Events. In: Albeverio, S., Jentsch, V., Kantz, H. (eds) Extreme Events in Nature and Society. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28611-X_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics