Skip to main content

Representing Transitive Propagation in OWL

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4215))

Abstract

Transitive propagation along properties can be modelled in various ways in the OWL description logic. Doing so allows existing description logic reasoners based on the tableaux algorithm to make inferences based on such transitive constructs. This is espectially useful for medical knowledge bases, where such constructs are common.

This paper compares, contrasts and evaluates a variety of different methods for simulating transitive propagation: property subsumption, classic SEP triples and adapted SEP triples. These modelling techniques remove the need to extending the OWL language with additional operators in order to express the transitive propagation. Other approaches require an extended tableaux reasoner or first-order logic prover, as well as a modification of the OWL standard.

The adapted SEP triples methodology is ultimately recommended as the most reliable modelling technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. TheFreeDictionary.com: Transitivity definition (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winston, M., Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.: A taxonomy of part-whole relations. In: Cognitive Science, vol. 11, pp. 417–444 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Odell, J.J.: Six different kinds of composition. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 5(8), 10–15 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL web ontology language guide. In: W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004), ASCM, pp. 723–731 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 23–40 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spackman, K.: Managing clinical terminology hierarchies using algorithmic calculation of subsumption: Experience with SNOMED-RT. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Fall Symposium (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rector, A.L., Bechhofer, S., Goble, C., Horrocks, I., Nowlan, W.A., Solomon, W.D.: The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 9(2), 139–171 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rector, A.: Analysis of propagation along transitive roles: Formalisation of the GALEN experience with medical ontologies. In: DL 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel-Schneider, P.: The OWL 1.1 Extension to the W3C OWL Web Ontology Language (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The Even More Irresistible SROIQ. Technical report, University of Manchester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Decidability of SHIQ with complex role inclusion axioms. Artificial Intelligence 160(1–2), 79–104 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Rector, A.L.: Normalisation of ontology implementations: Towards modularity, re-use, and maintainability. In: EKAW Workshop on Ontologies for Multiagent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dameron, O.: JOT: a Scripting Environment for Creating and Managing Ontologies. In: 7th International Protégé Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schulz, S., Hahn, U., Romacher, M.: Part-Whole Reasoning in Medical Ontologies Revisited: Introducing Triplets into Classification-Based Description Logics. In: AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, Hanley & Belfus, pp. 830–834 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1, 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: Reasoner prototype: Implementing new reasoner with datatypes support. WonderWeb Project Deliverable (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER System Description. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2083, p. 701. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Pellet: An OWL DL reasoner. In: ISWC 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lutz, C., Sattler, U., Tendera, L.: The complexity of finite model reasoning in description logics. In: Baader, F. (ed.) CADE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2741, pp. 60–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Horrocks, I., Rector, A.L., Goble, C.A.: A Description Logic Based Schema for the Classification of Medical Data. In: KRDB (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: Analysis, classification and use. In: 15th International World Wide Web Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Wang, H., Rogers, J., Knublauch, H., Stevens, R., Wroe, C., Rector, A.: Designing User Interfaces to Minimise Common Errors in Ontology Development: the CO-ODE and HyOntUse Projects. In: Cox, S.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers, J., Rector, A.: GALEN’s model of parts and wholes: Experience and comparisons. In: Proceedings of AMIA Symposium, pp. 714–718 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Horrocks, I.: Optimisation techniques for expressive description logics. Technical Report UMCS-97-2-1, University of Manchester, Department of Computer Science (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seidenberg, J., Rector, A. (2006). Representing Transitive Propagation in OWL. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics