Skip to main content

Time Variant Causality Model Applied in Brain Connectivity Network Based on Event Related Potential

  • Conference paper
  • 1467 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4232))

Abstract

Granger causality model mostly used to find the interaction between different time series are more and more applied to natural neural network at present. Brain connectivity network that could imply interaction and coordination between different brain regions is a focused research of brain function. Usually synchronization and correlation are used to reveal the connectivity network based on event-related potential (ERP) signals. However, these methods lack the further information such as direction of the connectivity network. In this paper, we performed an approach to detect the direction by Granger causality model. Considering the non-stationary of ERP data, we used traditional recursive least square (RLS) algorithm to calculate time variant Granger causality. In particular, we extended the method on the significance of causality measures in order to make results more reasonable. These approaches were applied to the classic Stroop cognitive experiment to establish the causality network related to attention process mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lee, L., Harrison, L.M., Mechelli, A.: The functional brain connectivity workshop: report and commentary. Comput. Neural. Syst. 14, R1–R15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiener, N.: The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach, E.F. (ed.) Modern Mathermatics for Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424–438 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Geweke, J.: Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 304–324 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaminski, M.J., Ding, M., Truccolo, W.A., Bressler, S.L.: Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol. Cybern. 85, 145–157 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brovelli, A., Ding, M., Ledberg, A., Chen, Y., Nakamura, R., Bressler, S.L.: Beta oscillatory in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Aroc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9849–9854 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, M., Bressler, S.L., Yang, W., Liang, H.: Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modelling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol. Cybern. 83, 35–45 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, H., Ding, M., Nakamura, R., Bressler, S.L.: Causal influences in primate cerebral cortex during visual pattern discrimination. NeuroReport 11, 2875–2880 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moller, E., Schack, B., Arnold, M., Witte, H.: Instantaneous multivariate EEG coherence analysis by means of adaptive high-dimensional autoregressive models. J. Neurosci. Methods 105, 143–158 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hesse, W., Moller, E., Arnold, M., Schack, B.: The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J. Neurosci. Methods 124, 27–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., Farmer, J.: Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58, 77–94 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, D.L., Guo, T.M., Wei, J.H., Xiao, L.H.: An ERP Study on Processing Stages of Children’s Stroop Effect. Sci. Tech. Engng. 4(2), 84–88 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wen, X.T., Zhao, X.J., Yao, L.: Synchrony of Basic Neuronal Network Based on Event Related EEG. In: Wang, J., Liao, X.-F., Yi, Z. (eds.) ISNN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3498, pp. 725–730. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Shalev, L., Algom, D.: Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner’ s beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 997–1017 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Markela-Lerenc, J., Ille, N., Kaiser, S.: Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 18, 278–287 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yin, K., Zhao, XJ., Yao, L. (2006). Time Variant Causality Model Applied in Brain Connectivity Network Based on Event Related Potential. In: King, I., Wang, J., Chan, LW., Wang, D. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4232. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11893028_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11893028_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46479-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46480-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics