Skip to main content

Less Hashing, Same Performance: Building a Better Bloom Filter

  • Conference paper
Algorithms – ESA 2006 (ESA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4168))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A standard technique from the hashing literature is to use two hash functions h 1(x) and h 2(x) to simulate additional hash functions of the form g i (x) = h 1(x) + ih 2(x). We demonstrate that this technique can be usefully applied to Bloom filters and related data structures. Specifically, only two hash functions are necessary to effectively implement a Bloom filter without any loss in the asymptotic false positive probability. This leads to less computation and potentially less need for randomness in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billingsley, P.: Probability and Measure, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bose, P., Guo, H., Kranakis, E., Maheshwari, A., Morin, P., Morrison, J., Smid, M., Tang, Y.: On the false-positive rate of Bloom filters (submitted), http://cg.scs.carleton.ca/~morin/publications/ds/bloom-submitted.pdf

  3. Broder, A., Mitzenmacher, M.: Network Applications of Bloom Filters: A Survey. Internet Mathematics 1(4), 485–509 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cormode, G., Muthukrishnan, S.: Improved Data Stream Summaries: The Count-Min Sketch and its Applications. DIMACS Technical Report 2003-20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dillinger, P.C., Manolios, P.: Bloom Filters in Probabilistic Verification. In: Hu, A.J., Martin, A.K. (eds.) FMCAD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3312, pp. 367–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dillinger, P.C., Manolios, P.: Fast and Accurate Bitstate Verification for SPIN. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989, pp. 57–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubhashi, D.P., Ranjan, D.: Balls and Bins: A Case Study in Negative Dependence. Random Structures and Algorithms 13(2), 99–124 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan, L., Cao, P., Almeida, J., Broder, A.Z.: Summary cache: A scalable wide-area Web cache sharing protocol. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 8(3), 281–293 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ireland, K., Rosen, M.: A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirsch, A., Mitzenmacher, M.: Building a Better Bloom Filter. Harvard University Computer Science Technical Report TR-02-05 (2005), ftp://ftp.deas.harvard.edu/techreports/tr-02-05.pdf

  11. Knuth, D.: The Art of Computer Programming, Sorting and Searching, vol. 3. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lueker, G., Molodowitch, M.: More analysis of double hashing. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1988), pp. 354–359 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitzenmacher, M.: Compressed Bloom Filters. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 10(5), 613–620 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitzenmacher, M., Upfal, E.: Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pagh, A., Pagh, R., Srinivas Rao, S.: An Optimal Bloom Filter Replacement. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2005), pp. 823–829 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramakrishna, M.V.: Practical performance of Bloom filters and parallel free-text searching. Communications of the ACM 32(10), 1237–1239 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt, J.P., Siegel, A.: The analysis of closed hashing under limited randomness. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1990), pp. 224–234 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kirsch, A., Mitzenmacher, M. (2006). Less Hashing, Same Performance: Building a Better Bloom Filter. In: Azar, Y., Erlebach, T. (eds) Algorithms – ESA 2006. ESA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4168. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11841036_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38875-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38876-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics