Skip to main content

Presburger Modal Logic Is PSPACE-Complete

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4130))

Abstract

We introduce a Presburger modal logic PML with regularity constraints and full Presburger constraints on the number of children that generalize graded modalities, also known as number restrictions in description logics. We show that PML satisfiability is only pspace-complete by designing a Ladner-like algorithm that can be turned into an analytic proof system. algorithm. This extends a well-known and non-trivial pspace upper bound for graded modal logic. Furthermore, we provide a detailed comparison with logics that contain Presburger constraints and that are dedicated to query XML documents. As an application, we show that satisfiability for Sheaves Logic SL is pspace-complete, improving significantly its best known upper bound.

The second author has been supported by the research program ACI ”Masse de données”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afanasiev, L., Blackburn, P., Dimitriou, I., Gaiffe, B., Goris, E., Marx, M., de Rijke, M.: PDL for ordered trees. JANCL 15(2), 115–135 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Demri, S., de Rijke, M.: A modal perspective on path constraints. JLC 13(6), 939–956 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.: A really temporal logic. JACM 41(1), 181–204 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fattorosi Barnaba, M., De Caro, F.: Graded modalities. Studia Logica 44(2), 197–221 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bidoit, N., Cerrito, S., Thion, V.: A first step towards modeling semistructured data in hybrid multimodal logic. JANCL 14(4), 447–475 (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonatti, P., Peron, A.: On the undecidability of logics with converse, nominals, recursion and counting. AI 158(1), 75–96 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Boneva, I., Talbot, J.M.: Automata and logics for unranked and unordered trees. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, pp. 500–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerrato, C.: Decidability by filtrations for graded normal logics (graded modalities V). Studia Logica 53(1), 61–73 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G.: Expressive description logics. In: Description Logics Handbook, pp. 178–218. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Demri, S.: A polynomial space construction of tree-like models for logics with local chains of modal connectives. TCS 300(1–3), 235–258 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Demri, S., Lugiez, D.: Presburger modal logic is PSPACE-complete. Technical report, LSV, ENS de Cachan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fine, K.: In so many possible worlds. NDJFL 13(4), 516–520 (1972)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, M., Ladner, R.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. JCSS 18, 194–211 (1979)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Goré, R.: Tableaux methods for modal and temporal logics. In: Handbook of Tableaux Methods, pp. 297–396. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hemaspaandra, E.: The complexity of poor man’s logic. JLC 11(4), 609–622 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Reasoning with individuals for the description logic SHIQ. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) CADE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1831, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kupferman, O., Sattler, U., Vardi, M.Y.: The complexity of the graded μ-calculus. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) CADE 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2392, pp. 423–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ladner, R.: The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM Journal of Computing 6(3), 467–480 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Marx, M.: XPath and Modal Logics of finite DAG’s. In: Cialdea Mayer, M., Pirri, F. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2003. LNCS, vol. 2796, pp. 150–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Montanari, A., Policriti, A.: A set-theoretic approach to automated deduction in graded modal logics. In: IJCAI-15, pp. 196–201 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ohlbach, H.J., Schmidt, R., Hustadt, U.: Translating graded modalities into predicate logics. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Proof theory of modal logic, pp. 253–291. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Papadimitriou, Chr.: On the complexity of integer programming. JACM 28(4), 765–768 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Spaan, E.: The complexity of propositional tense logics. In: de Rijke, M. (ed.) Diamonds and Defaults, pp. 287–309. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seidl, H., Schwentick, Th., Muscholl, A., Habermehl, P.: Counting in trees for free. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 1136–1149. Springer, Heidelberg (2004), Long version available at (1136) http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~tick/

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Tobies, S.: PSPACE reasoning for graded modal logics. JLC 10, 1–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. van der Hoek, W.: On the semantics of graded modalities. JANCL 2(1), 81–123 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Hoek, W., de Rijke, M.: Counting objects. JLC 5(3), 325–345 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.: Graded modalities in epistemic logic. Logique et Analyse, 133–134, 251–270 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Verma, K.N., Seidl, H., Schwentick, Th.: On the complexity of equational Horn clauses. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) CADE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3632, pp. 337–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolper, P.: Temporal logic can be more expressive. I & C 56, 72–99 (1983)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Dal Zilio, S., Lugiez, D.: XML schema, tree logic and sheaves automata. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 246–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Dal Zilio, S., Lugiez, D.: XML schema, tree logic and sheaves automata. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing (AAECC) (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demri, S., Lugiez, D. (2006). Presburger Modal Logic Is PSPACE-Complete. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37187-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37188-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics