Skip to main content

Accessibility Issues in Two Specifications for E-Learning Tests: IMS QTI 1.2 and IMS QTI 2.0

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4061))

Abstract

The IMS Global Learning Consortium developed the QTI (Question and Test Interoperability) specification to allow the exchange of question and test data, and their corresponding result reports, between learning systems. QTI 1.2 had some accessibility issues, as the VISUAL project discovered when transforming QTI tests into accessible HTML and voice user interfaces. Some problems were due to an insufficient mechanism to specify alternative text, other problems were due to the ambiguity of the intent of certain interaction types. QTI 2.0 solved the issue of alternative text, but the ambiguity with regard to the intent of interaction types was not sufficiently addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AERA, APA & NCME: Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Associations, National Council on Measurement in Education (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barstow, C., McKell, M., Rothberg, M., Schmidt, C. (eds.): IMS Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications. White Paper (June 27, 2002), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accv1p0/imsacc_guidev1p0.html

  3. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I. (eds.): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 – W3C Recommendation (5-May-1999), Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT

  4. Dardailler, D., Palmer, S.B., McCathieNevile, C. (eds.): XML Accessibility Guidelines – W3C Working Draft (October 3, 2002), Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xag-20021003

  5. Dubinko, M., Klotz Jr., L.L., Merrick, R., Raman T.V. (eds.): XForms 1.0 – W3C Recommendation (October 14, 2003), Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xforms-20031014/

  6. Jackl, A. (ed.): IMS AccessForAll Meta-data Best Practice and Implementation Guide. Version 1.0. Final Specification (July 12, 2004), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/acclip/acclipv1p0/imsacclip_bestv1p0.html

  7. Lay, S. (ed.): IMS Question and Test Interoperability Implementation Guide. Version 2.0. Final specification (January 24, 2005), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p0/imsqti_implv2p0.html

  8. Lay, S. (ed.): IMS Question and Test Interoperability Overview. Version 2.0. Final specification (January 24, 2005), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p0/imsqti_oviewv2p0.html

  9. Norton, M., Treviranus, J. (eds.): IMS Learner Information Package Accessibility for LIP Best Practice and Implementation Guide. Version 1.0. Final Specification (June 18, 2003), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/acclip/acclipv1p0/imsacclip_bestv1p0.html

  10. Sharpe, K., Earle, S.: Assessment, Disability and the Problem of Compensation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2), 191–199 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smythe, C., Shepherd, E., Brewer, L., Lay, S. (eds.): IMS Question and Test Interoperability: ASI Best Practice & Implementation Guide. Version 1.2. Final Specification (February 11, 2002), Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/question/v1p2/imsqti_asi_bestv1p2.html

  12. Smythe, C., Shepherd, E., Brewer, L., Lay, S. (eds.): IMS Question and Test Interoperability: ASI Information Model Specification. Version 1.2. Final Specification (February 11, 2002), Available at: http://www.imsglobal.org/question/v1p2/imsqti_asi_infov1p2.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strobbe, C. (2006). Accessibility Issues in Two Specifications for E-Learning Tests: IMS QTI 1.2 and IMS QTI 2.0. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4061. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11788713_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11788713_81

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36020-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36021-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics