Skip to main content

Automatic Orthologous-Protein-Clustering from Multiple Complete-Genomes by the Best Reciprocal BLAST Hits

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 3916))

Abstract

Though the number of completely sequenced genomes quickly grows in recent years, the methods to predict protein functions by homology from the genomes have not been used sufficiently. It has been a successful technique to construct an OPCs(Orthologous Protein Clusters) with the best reciprocal BLAST hits from multiple complete-genomes. But it takes time-consuming-processes to make the OPCs with manual work. We, here, propose an automatic method that clusters OPs(Orthologous Proteins) from multiple complete-genomes, which is, to be extended, based on INPARANOID which is an automatic program to detect OPs between two complete-genomes. We also prove all possible clustering mathematically.

This work was supported by the Regional Research Centers Program of Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development in South Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fitch, W.M.: Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19, 99–113 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tatusov, R.L., Koonin, E.V., Lipman, D.J.: A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278(5338), 631–637 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tatusov, R.L., Galperin, M.Y., Natale, D.A., Koonin, E.V., et al.: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Research 28, 33–36 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W.: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tatusov, R.L., Fedorova, N.D., Jackson, J.D., Aviva, R., Jacobs, A.R., et al.: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chervitz, S.A., Aravind, L., Sherlock, G., Ball, C.A., et al.: Comparison of the complete protein set of worm and yeast:orthology and divergence. Science 282, 2022–2028 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin, G.M., Yandell, M.D., Wortman, J.R., Gabor Miklos, G.L., et al.: Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287, 2204–2215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wheelan, S.J., Boguski, M.S., Duret, L., Makalowski, W.: Human and nematode orthologs – lessons from the analysis of 1800 human genes and the proteome of Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 238, 163–170 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mushegian, A.R., Garey, J.R., Martin, J., Liu, L.X.: Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organisms: a comparison of orthologous proteins enclosed by the human, fly, nematode, and yeast genomes. Genome. Res. 8, 590–598 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanehisa, M., Peer, B.: Bioinformatics in the post-sequences era. nature genetics supplement 33, 305–310 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bork, P., Koonin, E.V.: Predicting functions from protein sequence-where are the bottlenecks? Nat. Genet. 18, 313–318 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisen, J.A.: Phylogenomics:improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome. Res. 8, 163–167 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galperin, M.Y., Koonin, E.V.: Source of systematic error in functional annotation of genomes: domain rearrangement, nonorthologous gene displacement and operon disruption. In Silico Biol. 1, 55–67 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kimmen, S.: Phylogenomic inference of protein molecular function: advances and challenges. Bioinformatics 20, 170–179 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bono, H., Goto, S., Fujibuchi, W., Ogata, H., et al.: Systematic Prediction of Orthologous Units of Genes in the Complete Genomes. In: Genome. Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome. Inform., vol. 9, pp. 32–40 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Remm, M., Storm, C.E., Sonnhammer, E.L.: Automatic Clustering of Orthologs and in-paralogs from Pairwise Species Comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montague, M.G., Hutchison III, C.A.: Gene content phylogeny of herpersviruses. PNAS, 5334–5339 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stuart, J.M., Segal, E., Koller, D., Kim, S.K.: A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved genetic Modules. Science 302, 249–255 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, S., Jung, K.S., Ryu, K.H. (2006). Automatic Orthologous-Protein-Clustering from Multiple Complete-Genomes by the Best Reciprocal BLAST Hits. In: Li, J., Yang, Q., Tan, AH. (eds) Data Mining for Biomedical Applications. BioDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3916. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11691730_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11691730_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33104-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33105-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics