Abstract
Within this chapter, the authors suggest that networks need tailored performance measurement tools, if they want to succeed in showing their superiority over traditional ways of delivering solutions. However, in order to assess their added value, networks first must be aware of their purpose(s). The paper starts with a definition of performance management and measurement followed by a classification scheme which supports the identification of the most appropriate method for measuring performance or value added of networks: Goal-driven networks are likely to use more traditional performance measurement whilst capability enhancement-driven networks need distinctly new approaches, for instance methods for mapping the flows of Intellectual Capital which are presented in greater detail in this chapter as well. Based on these insights, research challenges for the measurement of the network’s added value are proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Deloitte (2002). Collaborative knowledge networks, Deloitte Consulting and Deloitte & Touche, New York.
Dvir, R. (2003). Investigation of KM and QM IC flows by means of Intellectual Capital (IC) mapping methodology, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, Bedford (forthcoming).
Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 3, 366–373.
Kaplan, R.S.; Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Kemp, J.; von Wendel de Joode, R. (2002). The Strategy-finding Task within Collaborative Networks, based on an exemplary Case of the Linux Community, Pro-VE 2002 conference, Lisboa.
McKinsey (2002). Managing an alliance portfolio. The McKinsey Quarterly. www.mckinseyquarterly.com (accessed 07/02).
Pritchard, R.D. (1990). Measuring and improving organisational productivity: a practical approach. Praeger publishers, New York.
Roth, N. (2002). Performance Measurement to improve knowledge reuse and invention in new product development, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, Bedford.
Sveiby, K.E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth. Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, S., Roth, N., Sturm, F. (2004). Performance Measurement and Added Value of Networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds) Collaborative Networked Organizations. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7833-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7833-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7823-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7833-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive