Abstract
One of the toughest nuts to crack in educational change is policy itself — not this policy or that policy, but the basic ways in which policy is conceived, developed and put into practice.
In this chapter, Linda Darling-Hammond outlines a new paradigm for educational policy better suited to the complexities of our times. In place of top-down, linear approaches to educational policy and its implementation, Darling-Hammond argues for a more inclusive approach to policy that combines and integrates bottom-up and top-down approaches in a framework that will be more empowering for all. Darling-Hammond argues for policy processes that create political consensus, ensure equity, develop and enforce standards and build local capacity, school-by-school for people who work in the front lines of our classrooms. Policies she says, should be more concerned with learning than compliance, as much about support as pressures and demands. She closes her chapter with specific instances of where such new paradigm policy processes in education are already beginning to emerge.
This chapter draws substantially on Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aikin, W. (1942). Adventure in American Education Vol 1: Story of the Eight Year Study. NY: Harper and Brothers.
Ancess, J. (1996). Outside/inside, inside/outside: Developing and implementing the school quality review. NY: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 195–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Berliner, D. C. (1986, August–September). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 513.
Berman P. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting education change: Implementing and sustainining innovations (Vol. 8). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Carlson, R. O. (1965). Adoption of educational innovations. Eugene, Oregon: Center for Advanced Sudy of Educational Administration, University of Oregon.
Carter, K. & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structures and comprehension processes. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teacher thinking (pp. 147–160). London: Cassell.
Chamberlin, D., E. S. Chamberlin, N., Drought, & W., Scott. (1942). Adventure in American education, vol. 4: Did They Succeed in College? NY: Harper and Brothers.
Chittenden, E., Bussis, A., & Amarel, M. (1976) Beyond surface curriculum. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cohen, D. (1995, June). What standards for national standards? Phi Delta Kappan: 751–757.
Cremin, L. (1989). Popular education and its discontents. NY: Harper & Row.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19, 3–13.
Curtis, M., & Glaser, R. (1981). Changing conceptions of intelligence. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 9). (pp. 111–150). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: The power of the bottom over the top. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, X, & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. NY: Teachers College Press.
Deming, W. E. (1988). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Elmore, R. (1983). Complexity and control: What legislators and administrators can do about implementing policy. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy. NY: Longman.
Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Incentives and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Elmore, R., & Fuhrman, S. (1993). Opportunity to learn and the state role in education. In The debate on opportunity-to-learn standards: commissioned papers. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association.
Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. NY: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (1994). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Paper prepared for the U.S. Department of Education.
Gallagher, J. J. (1967, January). Teacher variation in concept presentation. BSCS Newsletter (No. 30).
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. NY: Basic Books
Glaser, R. (1990). Testing and Assessment: O Temporal O Mores! Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
Green, T. F. (1980). Predicting the behavior of the educational system. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 18, pp. 385–456). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.
Gutierrez, C. (1995). Personal communication.
Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York: Doubleday.
Hudson Institute. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
Kearns, D. (1988). An education recovery plan for America. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 565–570.
Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (1993). Varieties of excellence: Identifying and assessing children’s talents. NY: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. NY: McGraw-Hill.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The RAND change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.
Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching to new standards. In S. Fuhrman & J. O-Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
O’Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic school reform and educational opportunity. In Susan Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1993). Curriculum reform: Assessment in question. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Quality in teaching. Paris: Author.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. NY: Penguin Books.
Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rothman, A. I., Welch, W., & Walberg, H. J. (1969). Physics teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 63.
Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 195–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of schools and the problem of change (Rev. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. NY: Doubleday.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Silvernail, D. (1997). England’s market system of education. New York: National Center on Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.
Walberg, H.J., & Rothman, A. I. (1969). Teacher achievement and student learning. Science Education, 53, 256–257.
Wilson, S. (1990, Fall). A conflict of interests: Constraints that affect teaching and change. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3)
Wise, A. E. (1979). Legislated learning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Policy and Change: Getting Beyond Bureaucracy. In: Hargreaves, A. (eds) Extending Educational Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3291-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4453-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)