Skip to main content

Policy and Change: Getting Beyond Bureaucracy

  • Chapter
Extending Educational Change

Abstract

One of the toughest nuts to crack in educational change is policy itself — not this policy or that policy, but the basic ways in which policy is conceived, developed and put into practice.

In this chapter, Linda Darling-Hammond outlines a new paradigm for educational policy better suited to the complexities of our times. In place of top-down, linear approaches to educational policy and its implementation, Darling-Hammond argues for a more inclusive approach to policy that combines and integrates bottom-up and top-down approaches in a framework that will be more empowering for all. Darling-Hammond argues for policy processes that create political consensus, ensure equity, develop and enforce standards and build local capacity, school-by-school for people who work in the front lines of our classrooms. Policies she says, should be more concerned with learning than compliance, as much about support as pressures and demands. She closes her chapter with specific instances of where such new paradigm policy processes in education are already beginning to emerge.

This chapter draws substantially on Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikin, W. (1942). Adventure in American Education Vol 1: Story of the Eight Year Study. NY: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancess, J. (1996). Outside/inside, inside/outside: Developing and implementing the school quality review. NY: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 195–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1986, August–September). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman P. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting education change: Implementing and sustainining innovations (Vol. 8). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. O. (1965). Adoption of educational innovations. Eugene, Oregon: Center for Advanced Sudy of Educational Administration, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structures and comprehension processes. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teacher thinking (pp. 147–160). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, D., E. S. Chamberlin, N., Drought, & W., Scott. (1942). Adventure in American education, vol. 4: Did They Succeed in College? NY: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden, E., Bussis, A., & Amarel, M. (1976) Beyond surface curriculum. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1995, June). What standards for national standards? Phi Delta Kappan: 751–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. (1989). Popular education and its discontents. NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M., & Glaser, R. (1981). Changing conceptions of intelligence. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 9). (pp. 111–150). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: The power of the bottom over the top. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, X, & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1988). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. (1983). Complexity and control: What legislators and administrators can do about implementing policy. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy. NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Incentives and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R., & Fuhrman, S. (1993). Opportunity to learn and the state role in education. In The debate on opportunity-to-learn standards: commissioned papers. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1994). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Paper prepared for the U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1967, January). Teacher variation in concept presentation. BSCS Newsletter (No. 30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. NY: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1990). Testing and Assessment: O Temporal O Mores! Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. F. (1980). Predicting the behavior of the educational system. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 18, pp. 385–456). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, C. (1995). Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson Institute. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, D. (1988). An education recovery plan for America. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (1993). Varieties of excellence: Identifying and assessing children’s talents. NY: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The RAND change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching to new standards. In S. Fuhrman & J. O-Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic school reform and educational opportunity. In Susan Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1993). Curriculum reform: Assessment in question. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Quality in teaching. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. I., Welch, W., & Walberg, H. J. (1969). Physics teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 195–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of schools and the problem of change (Rev. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvernail, D. (1997). England’s market system of education. New York: National Center on Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H.J., & Rothman, A. I. (1969). Teacher achievement and student learning. Science Education, 53, 256–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (1990, Fall). A conflict of interests: Constraints that affect teaching and change. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. E. (1979). Legislated learning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Policy and Change: Getting Beyond Bureaucracy. In: Hargreaves, A. (eds) Extending Educational Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics