Skip to main content

The Subjectivity of Lexical Cohesion in Text

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Information Retrieval Series ((INRE,volume 20))

Abstract

A reader’s perception of even an “objective” text is to some degree subjective. We present the results of a pilot study in which we looked at the degree of subjectivity in readers’ perceptions of lexical semantic relations, which are the building blocks of the lexical chains used in many applications in natural language processing. An example is presented in which the subjectivity reflects the reader’s attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. Bibliography

  • Barsalou, L. (1989) Intra-concept similarity and its implications for inter-concept similarity. In Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. (Eds.) Similarity and analogical reasoning. 6–121. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, R. and Herrmann, D. (1984) The similarity and diversity of semantic relations. Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D. (1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evens, M., Markowitz, J., Smith, R., and Werner, O. (Eds.) (1983) Lexical semantic relations: A comparative survey. Linguistic Research Inc., Edmonton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1998) WordNet: An electronic lexical database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. (1968) The Case for Case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. (Eds.) Universals in linguistic theory. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L. (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1984) Coherence and cohesive harmony. In Flood, J. (Ed.) Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose. 181–219. International Reading Association, Newark, Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. (1991) Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(3), 169–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.C. and Thomson, S.A. (1988) Rhetorical structure theory. Text, 8, 243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K. and Boisvert, S. (1998) Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(3), 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milstead, J.L. (2001) Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms. In C.A. Bean and R. Green (Eds.) Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. 53–66. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. and Hirst, G. (1991) Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelameghan, A. (2001) Lateral relationships in multicultural, multilingual databases in the spiritual and religious domains: The OM Information Service. In C. Bean and R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. 185–198. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. (1994) The World on Paper. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roget, P. M. Roget’s International Thesaurus. Many editions and publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morris, J., Hirst, G. (2006). The Subjectivity of Lexical Cohesion in Text. In: Shanahan, J.G., Qu, Y., Wiebe, J. (eds) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4026-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4102-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics