Skip to main content

Characterizing Biomedical Concept Relationships

Concept Relationships as a Pathway for Knowledge Creation and Discovery

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 8))

Chapter Overview

The importance of biomedical concept relationships and document concept interrelationships are discussed and some of the ways in which concept relationships have been used in information search and retrieval are reviewed. We look at examples of innovative approaches utilizing biomedical concept identification and relationships for improved document and information retrieval and analysis that support knowledge creation and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aone, C., Halverson, L., Hampton, T. and Ramos-Santacruz, M. SRA (1998). “Description of the IE2 System Used for MUC-7,” in Proc 7th Message Understanding Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, A. R. (2001). “Effective Mapping of Biomedical Text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap Program,” in Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, pp. 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945). “As We May Think,” The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1):101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdury C. G. (1999). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. Library Association Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, T. C. (1978). Linked Phrase Indexing. Information Processing and Management, 14(6):469–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farradane, J. (1980). “Relational Indexing, Parts I and II,” Journal of Information Science, l(5–6):267–76; 313–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett A. C. (1982). The Subject Approach to Information. 4th ed. Hamden, CT: Linnet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, K., Tamura, A., Tsunoda, T. and Takagi, T. (1988). “Toward Information Extraction: Identifying Protein Names from Biological Papers,” in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 707–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S., Revere, D., Bugni, P. and Martin, G.M. (2004). “A Knowledgebase Information System to Enhance Scientific Discovery: Telemakus,” BMC Digital Libraries;1(1):2 (21 September 2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaizauskas, R., Demetriou, G. and Humphreys, K. (2000). “Term Recognition and Classification in Biological Science Journal Articles,” in Proceedings of the Computational Terminology Workshop for Medical and Biological Applications, pp. 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1966). “The Who and Why of ISI,” Essays of an Information Scientist, 13:33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., Bean, C. A. and Myaeng, S. H. (2002). “Introduction,” in R. Green, C.A. Bean and S.H. Myaeng (eds.), The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. vii–xviii. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R. (2001). “Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge: An Overview,” In C.A. Bean and R. Green (eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, pp. 3–18. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetzler, B. (1997). “Beyond Word Relations: SIGIR’ 97 Workshop,” ACM SIGIR Forum, 31(2):28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, L., Park, J. C., Tsujii, I, Wong, L. and Wu, C. H. (2002). “Accomplishments and Challenges in Literature Data Mining for Biology,” Bioinformatics, 18(12): 1553–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hristovski, D., Peterlin, B., Mitchell, J. A. and Humphrey, S. M. (2004; in press). “Using Literature-based Discovery to Identify Disease Candidate Genes,” International Journal of Medical Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, G. and Chen, H. (2005; in press). “Genescene: An Ontology-enhanced Integration of Linguistic and Co-occurrence Based Relations in Biomedical Texts,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Jenssen, T.-K, Nygaard, V., Sack, J. and Hovig, E. (2004; in press). “FigSearch: A Figure Legend Indexing and Classification System,” Bioinformatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. K. and Wong, M. (1999). “Toward Routine Automatic Pathway Discovery from Online Scientific Text Abstracts,” in Proceedings of the Genome Informatics Series: Workshop on Genome Informatics, pp. 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J., Castano, J., Zhang, J., Kotecki, M and Cochran, B. (2002). “Robust Relational Parsing over Biomedical Literature: Extracting Inhibit Relations,” in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 362–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revere, D., Fuller, S.S., Bugni, P. and Martin, G.M. (2004). “An Information Extraction and Representation System for Rapid Review of the Biomedical Literature,” Accepted for Presentation: MedInfo, Sept 2004, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindflesch, T. C., Tanabe, L., Weinstein, J. N. and Hunter, L. (2002). “EDGAR: Extraction of Drugs, Genes and Relations from the Biomedical Literature,” in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 517–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapley, B. J. and Benoit, G. (2002). “Biobibliometrics: Information Retrieval and Visualization from Co-occurrences of Gene Names in Medline Abstracts,” in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 529–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. R. and Smalheiser, N. R. (1997). “An Interactive System for Finding Complementary Literatures: A Stimulus to Scientific Discovery,” Artificial Intelligence, 91(2):183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. R., Smalheiser, N.R. and Bookstein, A. (2001). “Information Discovery from Complementary Literatures: Categorizing Viruses as Potential Weapons,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(10):797–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taube M. (1953–1959). Studies in Coordinate Indexing, vols. 1–5. Washington, DC: Documentation, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolle, K., and Chen, H. (2000). “Comparing Noun Phrasing Techniques for Use With Medical Digital Library Tools,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Special Issue on Digital Libraries, 51(4):352–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wren, J. D., Bekeredjian, R., Stewart, J. A., Shohet, R. V., Garner, H. R. (2004). “Knowledge Discovery by Automated Identification and Ranking of Implicit Relationships,” Bioinformatics, 20(3):389–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A. S., Hirschman, L. and Morgan, A. A. (2003). “Evaluation of Text Data Mining for Database Curation: Lessons Learned from the KDD Challenge Cup,” Bioinformatics, 19(Suppl 1):i331–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

  • Adamic, L. A., Wilkinson, D., Huberman, B.A. and Adar, E. “A Literature Based Method for Identifying Gene-disease Connections,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Bioinformatics Conference 2002, pp. 109–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman C., Kra, P., Yu H, Krauthammer, M. and Rzhetsky, A. “GENIES: A Natural-language Processing System for the Extraction of Molecular Pathways from Journal Articles.” Bioinformatics 2001;17 (Suppl 1):S74–S82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shatkay, H. and Feldman, R. “Mining the Biomedical Literature in the Genomic Era: An Overview.” Journal of Computational Biology 2003;10(6);821–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, P. and Sehgal, A. K. “Mining MEDLINE for Similar Genes and Similar Drugs. Technical Report, TR#03-02. School of Library and Information Science, University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeber, M., Vos, R, Klein, H., de Jong-Van den Berg LTW, Aronson, A. and Molema, G. “Generating Hypotheses by Discovering Implicit Associations in the Literature: A Case Report for New Potential Therapeutic Uses for Thalidomide.” JAMIA 2003;10(3):252–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Revere, D., Fuller, S.S. (2005). Characterizing Biomedical Concept Relationships. In: Chen, H., Fuller, S.S., Friedman, C., Hersh, W. (eds) Medical Informatics. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25739-X_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25739-X_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24381-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25739-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics