Skip to main content
Log in

Principles and methods for the validation of quantitative remote sensing products

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We first discuss the relativity of “true value and homogeneity” for quantitative remote sensing products (QRSPs), and then propose the definitions of “eigenaccuracy” and “eigenhomogeneity” under practical conditions. The eigenaccuracy and eigenhomogeneity for land surface crucial parameters such as albedo, leaf area index (LAI), and surface temperature are analyzed based on a series of experiments. Secondly, we point out the differences and similarities between the scale-free phenomena of the QRSPs and the measurements of the coastline length (1-dimensional) and the curved surface area (2-dimensional). An information fractal algorithm for the QRSPs is presented. In a case study for the LAI, when the fractal dimension is 2.16, the ratio of the LAI retrieval values obtained respectively from remote sensing data of 30 m and 6 km pixel resolution can actually reach as high as 2.86 for the same 6 km pixel using the same retrieval model. Finally, we propose an operational validation method “one test and two matches” and multipoint observation when the real situation does not allow carrying out scanning measurement without gap and overlap on the ground surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandelbrot B B. Stochastic models for the earth’s relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines and the numbered-area rule for islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1975, 72: 3825–3828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandelbrot B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco: Freeman Press, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker F, Li Z L. Surface temperature and emissivity at various scales: Definition, measurement and related problems. Remote Sens Rev, 1995, 12: 225–253

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li X W, Alan S, Fried M. A conceptual model for effective directional emissivity from for non-isothermal surface. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing, 1999, 37: 2508–2517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaggi S, Dale A. Implementation of operation of three fractal measurement algorithms for analysis of remotes-sensing data. Comput Geosci, 1993, 19: 745–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao J, LI X H, Shan Y B. Fractal research of typical features remote sensing image in Beijing areas. Geomatics Spat Inf Technol, 2001, 24: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang H G, Huang W L, Zhou C B, et al. Fractal characterization of IKONOS imagery. Bull Surv Map, 2005, 5: 15–18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez V J, Paredes S, Borgani S. Bidirectional multiscaling properties of largescale structure in the universe. Science, 1995, 269: 1245–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam N S N. Description and measurement of Landsat TM images using fractals. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 1990, 56: 187–195

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang R H, Li Z L, Tang X Z, et al. Study of emissivity scaling and relative of homogeneity of surface temperature. Int J Remote Sens, 2004, 25: 245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J M. Spatial scaling of a remotely sensed surface parameter by contexture. Int J Remote Sens, 1999, 10: 1539–1561

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang S L. Numerical experiments on the spatial scaling of land surface Albedo and leaf area index. Remote Sens Rev, 2000, 19: 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang R H, Tian J, Su H B, et al. A Measuring Device for Studying Scaling of Emissivities from Sub-pixel to Pixel. IEEE Proceedings Transactions Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, 2006

  14. Kustas W P, Norman J M. Evaluating the effects of subpixel heterogeneity on pixel average fluxes. Remote Sens Environ, 1999, 74: 327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang R H. A new model for estimating crop water deficiency based on infrared information. Sci China Ser B, 1987, 30: 413–425

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang R H, Sun X M, Zhu Z L, et al. A remote sensing model of CO2 flux for wheat and studying of regional distribution. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 1999, 42: 325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang R H, Sun X M, Liu J Y, et al. Determination of regional distribution of crop transpiration and soil water use efficiency using quantitative remote sensing data through inversion. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2003, 46: 10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang R H, Sun X M, Wang W M, et al. An operational two-layer remote sensing model to estimate surface flux in regional scale: Physical background. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(Suppl): 225–244

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gu X F, Yu T, Li X W. The radiometric cross calibration of the thermal infrared channels of the CBERS. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2005, 35(Suppl): 155–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RenHua Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Tian, J., Li, Z. et al. Principles and methods for the validation of quantitative remote sensing products. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 741–751 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-0021-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-0021-3

Keywords

Navigation