Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric distances, semidirected networks and majority in Fermat–Weber problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fermat–Weber problem is considered with distance defined by a quasimetric, an asymmetric and possibly nondefinite generalisation of a metric. In such a situation a distinction has to be made between sources and destinations. We show how the classical result of optimality at a destination or a source with majority weight, valid in a metric space, may be generalized to certain quasimetric spaces. The notion of majority has however to be strengthened to supermajority, defined by way of a measure of the asymmetry of the distance, which should be finite. This extended majority theorem applies to most asymmetric distance measures previously studied in literature, since these have finite asymmetry measure.

Perhaps the most important application of quasimetrics arises in semidirected networks, which may contain edges of different (possibly zero) length according to direction, or directed edges. Distance in a semidirected network does not necessarily have finite asymmetry measure. But it is shown that an adapted majority result holds nevertheless in this important context, thanks to an extension of the classical node-optimality result to semidirected networks with constraints.

Finally the majority theorem is further extended to Fermat–Weber problems with mixed asymmetric distances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, G. E. (1940). A note on quasimetric spaces. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 46, 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourbaki, N. (1943). Topologie générale. Paris: Herman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, L. M. (1970). Theory and applications of distance geometry. Bronx: Chelseta Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. J., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1993). Locating a noxious facility with respect to several polygonal regions using asymmetric distances. Computers and Operations Research, 20, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa, E., & Rodriguez-Chia, A. M. (1997). Weber problems with alternative transportation systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 97, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa, E., Conde, E., Munõz, M., & Puerto, J. (1997). Simpson points in planar problems with locational constraints. The polyhedral gauge case. Mathematics of Operations Research, 22, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cech, E. (1966). Topological spaces. London: Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cera, M., & Ortega, F. A. (2002). Locating the median hunter among n mobile prey on the plane. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cera, M., Mesa, J. A., Ortega, F. A., & Plastria, F. (2008). Locating a central hunter on the plane. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 136(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. (1991). An improved method for the solution of the problem of location on an inclined plane. RAIRO Operations Research, 25, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deza, M. M., & Laurent, M. (1997). Geometry of cuts and metrics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Z., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1989). The asymmetric distance location problem. Transportation Science, 23(3), 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durier, R. R. (1990). On Pareto optima, the Fermat–Weber problem and polyhedral gauges. Mathematical Programming, 47, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durier, R., & Michelot, C. (1985). Geometrical properties of the Fermat–Weber problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 20(3), 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliege, J. (1994). Some new coincidence conditions in minisum multifacility location problems with mixed gauges. Studies in Locational Analysis, 7, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliege, J. (1997). Nondifferentiability detection and dimensionality reduction in minisum multifacility location problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 94(2), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliege, J. (1998). A note on ‘On Pareto optima, the Fermat–Weber problem, and polyhedral gauges’. Mathematical Programming, 84(2), 435–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliege, J. (2000). Solving convex location problems with gauges in polynomial time. Studies in Locational Analysis, 14, 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi, S. L. (1964). Optimal location of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations Research, 12, 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiriart-Urruty, J. B., & Lemaréchal, C. (2001). Fundamentals of convex analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa, Y., & Puerto, J. (2003). Single facility location problems with unbounded unit balls. Mathematical Methods in Operations Research, 58, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M. J., Wong, R. T., & Honsaker, J. (1987). The p-centroid problem on an inclined plane. Operations Research, 35(2), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idrissi, H., Lefebvre, O., & Michelot, C. (1988). A primal dual algorithm for a constrained Fermat–Weber problem involving mixed gauges. Recherche Operationnelle / Operations Research, 22, 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idrissi, H., Lefebvre, O., & Michelot, C. (1989). Duality for constrained multifacility location problems with mixed norms and applications. Annals of Operations Research, 18, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (1990). Finding groups in data. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. (1975). General topology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labbe, M., Peeters, D., & Thisse, J.-F. (1995). Location on networks. In M. Ball et al. (Eds.), Handbooks in OR & MS : Vol. 8. Network routing (pp. 551–624). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1967). An extended theorem for location on a network. Operational Research Quarterly, 18, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbaum, A. (1926). Contributions à l’étude de l’espace métrique. Fundamenta Mathematica, 8, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, R. F., Morris, J. G., & Wesolowski, G. O. (1988). Facility location: Models and methods. New York: Norh Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelot, C., & Lefebvre, O. (1987). A primal-dual algorithm for the Fermat–Weber problem involving mixed gauges. Mathematical Programming, 39, 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minieka, E. (1979). The chinese postman problem for mixed networks. Management Science, 25, 643–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, H. (1911). Theorie der konvexen Körper, Gesammelte Abhandlungen (Vol. 11). Berlin: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, P. B. (1975). Analysis of stochastic networks in emergency service systems, IRP-TR-15-75, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Nickel, S. (1998). Restricted center problems under polyhedral gauges. European Journal of Operational Research, 104, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, S., Puerto, J., & Rodriguez-Chía (2003). An approach to location models involving sets as existing facilities. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28, 693–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papini, P., & Puerto, J. (2005). Location problems with different norms for different points. Jouranl of Optimization Theory and Applications, 125, 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1984). Localization in single facility location. European Journal of Operational Research, 18, 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1987). Solving general continuous single facility location problems by cutting planes. European Journal of Operational Research, 29, 329–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1992a). GBSSS, the generalized big square small square method for planar single facility location. European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1992b). On destination optimality in asymmetric distance Fermat–Weber problems. Annals of Operations Research, 40, 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1992c). A majority theorem for Fermat–Weber problems in quasimetric spaces with applications to semidirected networks. In J. Moreno (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth meeting of the EURO working group on locational analysis (pp. 153–165). Tenerife, Spain: Puerto de la Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastria, F. (1994). Fully geometric solutions to some planar minimax location problems. Studies in Locational Analysis, 7, 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, H. (1943). Sur les espaces a métrique faible. Portugalia Mathematicae, 4, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinow, W. (1961). Die innere Geometrie der metrischen Räume. Berlin: Springer (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, T. (1970). Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. E., & Wendell, R. E. (1985). Using block norms for location modeling. Operations Research, 33, 1074–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, R. E., & Hurter, A. P. Jr. (1973). Optimal locations on a network. Transportation Science, 7, 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall, C. (1964). Optimal location of a central facility, mathematical models and concepts. Report 8388, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC, USA.

  • Witzgall, C. (1965). On convex metrics. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards – B. Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 69B(3), 175–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Plastria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plastria, F. Asymmetric distances, semidirected networks and majority in Fermat–Weber problems. Ann Oper Res 167, 121–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0351-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0351-0

Keywords

Navigation