Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic significance of depth of gross or microscopic perirectal fat invasion in T3 N0 M0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Although the standard of care for T3 and/or N1–2 rectal cancers includes adjuvant chemoradiation, it is unclear whether T3 N0 patients with limited microscopic perirectal fat invasion warrant further therapy. Our aim was to determine the prognostic significance of gross perirectal fat invasion, or depth of microscopic perirectal fat invasion, in T3 N0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy.

Patients and methods

Utilizing a prospective database, the medical records of 108 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for T3 N0 rectal cancer between June 1986 and December 1994 were analyzed. All pathological specimens were re-reviewed by a single pathologist, and extent of perirectal fat invasion was measured in millimeters. Patients who received either preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy were excluded.

Results

Macroscopic perirectal fat invasion (T3 gross) was present in 49 cases, absent in 40 cases (T3 microscopic), and not reported in 19 cases. Rectal cancers were stratified by extent of measured perirectal fat invasion into 3 mm or less and more than 3 mm. Five-year overall and local recurrence rates for the entire group were 19% and 8%, respectively. The disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall recurrence for rectal cancers with 3 mm or less invasion vs. more than 3 mm invasion, or T3 gross vs. T3 microscopic, were not statistically different.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the extent of gross, or microscopic perirectal fat invasion (defined as >3 or ≤3 mm), determined in the resected specimen, does not predict outcome in select T3 N0 rectal cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference (1990) Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA 264:1444–1450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (1985) Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 312:1465–1472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, et al (1991) Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:709–715

    Google Scholar 

  4. O'Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieand HS, et al (1994) Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med 331:502–507

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Petroni GR, et al (1997) Adjuvant postoperative fluorouracil-modulated chemotherapy combined with pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer: initial results of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 15:2030–2039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vigliotti A, Rich TA, Romsdahl MM, Withers HR, Oswald MJ (1987) Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:999–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kollmorgen CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Martenson JA, Illstrup DM (1994) The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 220:676–682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Friedlander-Klar H (1994) Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 167:90–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tepper JE, Cohen AM, Wood WC, Orlow EL, Hedberg SE (1987) Postoperative radiation therapy of rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:5–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133:894–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:375–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willett CG, Badizadegan K, Ancukiewicz M, Shellito PC (1999) Prognostic factors in stage T3/N0 rectal cancer: do all patients require postoperative pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy? Dis Colon Rectum 42:167–173

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merchant NB, Guillem JG, Paty PB, et al (1999) T3/N0 rectal cancer: results following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 3:642–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cawthorn SJ, Parums DV, Gibbs NM, et al (1990) Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet 335:1055–1059

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Merkel S, Mansmann U, Siassi M, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2001) The prognostic inhomogeneity in pT3 rectal carcinomas. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:298–304

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minsky BD, Mies C, Recht A, Rich TA, Chaffey JT (1988) Resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid and rectum. I. Patterns of failure and survival. Cancer 61:1408–1416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jass JR, Love SB, Northover JM (1987) A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer. Lancet I:1303–1306

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams NS, Jass JR, Hardcastle JD (1988) Clinicopathological assessment and staging of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 75:649–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet II:996–999

    Google Scholar 

  22. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235:449–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T, et al (1998) Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 41:979–983

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Hyams DM, et al (2000) Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:388–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was presented in part at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 12 May 2001 in San Francisco, Calif., USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose G. Guillem.

Additional information

An invited commentary on this paper is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0505-0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picon, A.I., Moore, H.G., Sternberg, S.S. et al. Prognostic significance of depth of gross or microscopic perirectal fat invasion in T3 N0 M0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 18, 487–492 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0504-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0504-1

Keywords

Navigation