Skip to main content
Log in

Lack of effect of casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, casopitant, is a weak-to-moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A) and has the potential to inhibit the metabolism of CYP3A substrates such as docetaxel.

Methods

Fourteen cancer patients were enrolled in this phase 1, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Intravenous (i.v.) docetaxel was coadministered with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone with (Regimen B) or without (Regimen A) 150 mg single-dose oral casopitant.

Results

The geometric least-squares mean Regimen B: Regimen A ratios (90% confidence interval) for docetaxel maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 0.97 (0.83, 1.12) and 1.06 (0.94, 1.19), respectively. Coadministration of casopitant and docetaxel was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles and absolute neutrophil count nadirs similar for both treatments.

Conclusions

Cmax and AUC of docetaxel were similar when given as monotherapy or when given in combination with casopitant. Likewise, absolute neutrophil count nadirs were similar for docetaxel alone or docetaxel with casopitant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, Sowerbutts T, Frewin C, Fox RM et al (1983) On the receiving end—patient perception of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Osoba D, Zee B, Warr D, Kaizer L, Latreille J, Pater J (1996) Quality of life studies in chemotherapy-induced emesis. Oncology 53:92–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, Kim HK, Park K, Jordan K et al (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 17:1000–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reddy GK, Gralla RJ, Hesketh PJ (2006) Novel neurokinin-1 antagonists as antiemetics for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Support Cancer Ther 3:140–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, Warr DG, Roila F, de Wit R, et al. (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the aprepitant protocol 052 study group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD, Julie Ma G, Eldridge K, Hipple A et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ, Muss HB, Herrstedt J, Eisenberg PD et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:2822–2830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagnon RC, King AG (2006) Co-administration of ondansetron and casopitant mesylate, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, results in augmented anti-emetic activity in the ferret [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 24(18 Suppl):18608

    Google Scholar 

  9. King AG (2005) Comparison of anti-emetic and peri-emetic behaviors of NK-1 receptor antagonists GW679769 and aprepitant in the ferret [abstract]. Support Care Cancer 13:04–031

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herrstedt J, Apornwirat W, Shaharyar A, Aziz Z, Roila F, Van Belle S et al (2009) Phase III trial of casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27:5363–5369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grunberg SM, Rolski J, Strausz J, Aziz Z, Lane S, Russo MW, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of casopitant mesylate, a neurokinin 1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist, in prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:549–558

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J, Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 perugia international antiemetic consensus conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, Feyer P, Clark-Snow R, Koeller JM et al (2006) American society of clinical oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24:2932–2947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ettinger DS, Bierman PJ, Bradbury B, Comish CC, Ellis G, Ignoffo RJ et al (2007) Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5:12–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrstedt J (2007) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Ann Oncol 18(suppl 2):83–85

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson BM, Wessels D, Milleri S et al (2009) Impact of casopitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A substrates midazolam and nifedipine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Denver, CO. Abstract 5457, 18–22 Apr 2009

  17. Marre F, Sanderink GJ, de Sousa G, Gaillard C, Martinet M, Rahmani R (1996) Hepatic biotransformation of docetaxel (Taxotere) in vitro: involvement of the CYP3A subfamily in humans. Cancer Res 56:1296–1302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Royer I, Monsarrat B, Sonnier M, Wright M, Cresteil T (1996) Metabolism of docetaxel by human cytochromes P450: interactions with paclitaxel and other antineoplastic drugs. Cancer Res 56:58–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke SJ, Rivory LP (1999) Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Clin Pharmacokinet 36:99–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sparreboom A, Van Tellingen O, Scherrenburg EJ, Boesen JJ, Huizing MT, Nooijen WJ et al (1996) Isolation, purification and biological activity of major docetaxel metabolites from human feces. Drug Metab Dispos 24:655–658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Engels FK, Ten Tije AH, Baker SD et al (2004) Effect of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Clin Pharmacol Ther 75:448–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez RI, Wang RW, Newton DJ et al (2004) Cytochrome P450 3A4 is the major enzyme involved in the metabolism of the substance P receptor antagonist aprepitant. Drug Metab Dispos 32:1287–1292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nygren P, Hande K, Petty KJ, Fedgchin M, van Dyck K, Majumdar A et al (2005) Lack of effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 55:609–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN (1998) Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279:1200–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin JH, Lu AYH (1998) Inhibition and induction of cytochrome P450 and the clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 35:361–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parkinson A (1996) An overview of current cytochrome P450 technology for assessing the safety and efficacy of new materials. Toxicol Pathol 24:45–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamamoto N (2000) Correlation between docetaxel clearance and estimated cytochrome P450 activity by urinary metabolite of exogenous cortisol. J Clin Oncol 18:2301–2308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goh BC (2002) Explaining interindividual variability of docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Asians through phenotyping and genotyping strategies. J Clin Oncol 20:3683–3690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirth J, Watkins PB, Strawderman M, Schott A, Bruno R, Baker LH (2000) The effect of an individual’s cytochrome CYP3A4 activity on docetaxel clearance. Clin Cancer Res 6:1255–1258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Taxotere (docetaxel) injection concentrate [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: sanofi-aventis US LLC; 2008. http://www.products.sanofi-aventis.us/taxotere/taxotere.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2010

  31. Bruno R, Hille D, Riva A, Vivier N, ten Bokkel Huinnink WW, van Oosterom AT et al (1998) Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in phase II studies in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:187–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN et al (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1502–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Extra J-M, Rousseau F, Bruno R, Clavel M, Le Bail N, Marty M (1993) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of taxotere (RP 56976; NSC 628503) given as a short intravenous infusion. Cancer Res 53:1037–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (NCT00440128). All listed authors meet the criteria for authorship set forth by the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors. Editorial support in the form of editorial suggestions to draft versions of this paper, assembling tables, collating authors comments, copyediting, fact checking, referencing, and graphic services was provided by Publication CONNEXION and was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurel M. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dandamudi, U.B., Adams, L.M., Johnson, B. et al. Lack of effect of casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67, 783–790 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1381-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1381-2

Keywords

Navigation