Abstract
Screening for osteoporosis is currently recommended for all women aged 65 years and older in the USA. How to address screening of non-white women and all men is unclear. Osteoporosis risk assessment questionnaires have been designed and tested mostly among postmenopausal white women, and there is a lack of consensus on appropriate bone mineral density (BMD) cut-off values for defining osteoporosis in non-white persons. The objectives of the present study were to identify a set of risk factors from published population-based studies in white women and men and determine the ability of these risk factors to predict osteoporosis and low BMD in African–American (AA), Mexican–American (MA), and white women and men, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this set of risk factors for identifying osteoporosis separately in AA, MA, and white women and men by the use of data for 2,590 women and 2,391 men 50–79 years of age from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). We employed the World Health Organisation (WHO) definition of osteoporosis, using race/ethnic and gender-specific young adult mean values when calculating the T scores. Low body-mass index, low calcium intake, current cigarette smoking, and physical inactivity were independent risk factors identified from population-based studies. The presence of one or more risk factors was associated with having osteoporosis and low BMD in all groups. The strength of these associations was greater when two or more risk factors were present but varied with race/ethnicity, gender, and age. We conclude that this set of osteoporosis risk factors predicts osteoporosis in non-white women and men. Furthermore, as a risk assessment tool, this set of risk factors might be useful for reducing the number of unnecessary BMD tests performed in older women as well as identifying non-white men who do not require BMD testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Osteoporosis Foundation (1999) Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Excerpta Medica, New Jersey
Nelson HD, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Allan JD (2002) Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:529–541
Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry. JAMA 288:1889–1897
World Health Organisation (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical report series no. 843. WHO, Geneva
Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259
De Laet CEDH, van der Klift M, Hofman A, Pols HAP (2002) Osteoporosis in men and women: a story about bone mineral density thresholds and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 17:2231–2236
Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915–1923
Ben Sedrine W, Chevallier T, Zegels B, Kvasz A, Micheletti MC, Gelas B, et al (2002) Development and assessment of the Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS) to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. Gynecol Endocrinol 16:245–250
Caderette SM, Jaglal SB, Krieger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294
Koh LKH, Ben Sedrine W, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, et al (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:699–705
Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Managed Care 4:37–48
National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Vital Health Stat 1(32). DHHS publication no. (PHS) 94–1308. NCHS, Hyattsville, Maryland
Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489
Yates AA, Schlicker SA, Suitor CW (1998) Dietary reference intakes: the new basis for recommendations for calcium and related nutrients, B vitamins, and choline. J Am Diet Assoc 98:699–706
Orwoll E (2000) Assessing bone density in men. J Bone Miner Res 15:1867–1870
Binkley NC, Schmeer P, Wasnich RD, Lenchik L (2002) International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Panel and Scientific Advisory Committee. What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians? J Clin Densitom 5[Suppl]:S19–27
Pollitzer WS, Anderson JJB (1989) Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs. environmental perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 50:1244–1259
Silverman SL, Madison RE (1988) Decreased incidence of hip fracture in Hispanics, Asians, and blacks: California hospital discharge data. Am J Public Health 78:1482–1483
Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768
Kröger H, Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Alhava E, Saarikoski S (1994) Bone mineral density and risk factors for osteoporosis—a population based study of 1600 perimenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 55:1–7
Lunt M, Masaryk P, Scheidt-Nave C, Nijs J, Poor G, Pols H, et al (2001) The effects of lifestyle, dietary dairy intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity prevalence: the EVOS study. Osteoporos Int 12:688–698
Nguyen TV, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1994) Lifestyle factors and bone density in the elderly: implications for osteoporosis prevention. J Bone Miner Res 9:1339–1346
Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, Tucker KL, Cupples LA, Wilson PWF, et al (2000) Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham osteoporosis study. J Bone Miner Res 15:710–720
Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results for the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333
Bendavid EJ, Shan J, Barrett-Connor E (1996) Factors associated with bone mineral density in middle-aged men. J Bone Miner Res 11:1185–1190
Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA (1994) Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. BMJ 309:691–695
Burger H, de Laet CEDH, van Daele PLA, Weel AEAM, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, et al (1998) Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam study. Am J Epidemiol 147:871–879
Huuskonen J, Väisänen SB, Kröger H, Jurvelin C, Bouchard C, Alhava E, et al (2000) Determinants of bone mineral density in middle-aged men: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 11:702–708
Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Krall EA, Dallal GE (1997) Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 337:670–676
Riggs BL, O’Fallon WM, Muhs J, O’Connor MK, Kumar R, Melton LJ 3rd (1998) Long-term effects of calcium supplementation on serum parathyroid hormone level, bone turnover, and bone loss in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 13:168–174
Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CHD, Kellingray S, Wood PJ, Cooper C (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Broussard, D.L., Magnus, J.H. Risk assessment and screening for low bone mineral density in a multi-ethnic population of women and men: does one approach fit all?. Osteoporos Int 15, 349–360 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1549-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1549-2