Skip to main content
Log in

Static and Dynamic Experimental Investigation of a Pneumatic Open Loop Proportional Valve

  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluid power regulation elements play a fundamental role in determining the characteristics of a servosystem. Valve is a critical component when deciding the overall performance, as it influences both running and transient conditions. It is hence important to correctly predict the performances of that component by an accurate numerical non linear model. The non linearities of the valve influence steady state accuracy of a system, especially in position servo systems. In the paper a methodology to test a pneumatic open loop proportional valve, with the description of the test bench and of the experimental scheme to measure the interested magnitudes, is presented. Results of the experimental activities, both in static and dynamic conditions, are reported, with particular attention to the flow magnitude, pressures and spool displacement. The analysis of the experimental data points out the non linearities of the system and the strong influence of force disturbances on the displacement of the spool, which works in open loop. The outcome of the experimental investigation allows to relate the input/output magnitudes in a graphical way, using a map of the data and to develop static and dynamic models for computer simulation, mechatronic design and control algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorli M, Pastorelli S, Hydraulic and pneumatic actuation systems. In Bishop RH (ed) The Mechatronics Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 20–62 20–96

  2. Sorli M, Figliolini G, Pastorelli S (2004) Dynamic model and experimental investigation of a pneumatic proportional pressure valve. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 9(1):78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belforte G, Sorli M, Gastaldi L (1997) Active orthosis for rehabilitation and passive exercise. In: 4th International Conference on simulation in biomedicine: computational mechanics, Perugia, 1997. pp. 199–208

  4. Sacco K, Cauda F, D’Agata F et al (2011) A combined robotic and cognitive training for locomotor rehabilitation: evidences of cerebral functional reorganization in two chronic traumatic brain injured patients. Front Human Neurosci 5: doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00146

  5. Fischer G, Iordachita I, Csoma C, Tokuday J, Mewesy P, Tempanyy C, Hatay N, Fichtingerz G (2008) Pneumatically operated MRI-compatible needle placement robot for prostate interventions. In: 2008 I.E. international conference on robotics and automation

  6. Bruni S, Vinolas J, Berg M, Polach O, Stichel S (2011) Modelling of suspension components in a rail vehicle dynamics context. Veh Syst Dyn 49(7):1021–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacazio G, Gastaldi L (2009) An autonomous pneumotronic system for enhancing the braking capability of long freight trains. In Proc.ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference 2009, DSCC2009

  8. Hodgsona S, Leb M, Tavakolia M, Phamb MT (2012) Improved tracking and switching performance of an electro-pneumatic positioning system. Mechatronics 22:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sorli M, Gastaldi L (2009) Thermic influence on the dynamics of pneumatic servosystems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 131(2):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Falcão Carneiro J, de Almeida GF (2013) Using two servovalves to improve pneumatic force control in industrial cylinders. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saleem A, Wong CB, Pu J, Moore PR (2009) Mixed-reality environment for frictional parameters identification in servo-pneumatic system. Simul Model Pract Theory 17(10):1575–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krivts IL (2004) Optimization of performance characteristics of electropneumatic (two-stage) servo valve. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 126:416–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyajima T, Sakaki K, Shibukawa T, Fujita T, Kawashima K, Kagawa T (2004) Development of pneumatic high precise position controllable servo valve. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Control Applications

  14. Virvalo T (2001) The influence of servo valve size on the performance of a pneumatic position servo. In Proc 5th Int, Conf. On Fluid Power Transmission and Control ICEP

  15. Yin YB, Araki K (1998) Modelling and analysis of an asymmetric valve-controlled single-acting cylinder of a pneumatic force control system. In proc.SICE, pp.1099–1104

  16. Mehmood A, Laghrouche S, El Bagdouri M (2013) Nonlinear dynamic modeling of an electro-pneumatic pressure converter for VGT pneumatic actuator. Int J Automot Technol 14(6):941–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes de Almeida F (2011) Pneumatic servovalve models based on artificial neural networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I 225(3):393–411

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richard E, Scavarda S (1996) Comparison between linear and nonlinear control of an electropneumatic servodrive. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 118(2):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomasset D, Scavarda S, Sesmat S, Belgharbi M (1999) Analytical model of the flow stage of a pneumatic servodistributor for simulation and nonlinear control. In: Proc. of the Sixth Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid PowerTampere, Finland, May 26–28 1999: 848–860

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Gastaldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gastaldi, L., Pastorelli, S. & Sorli, M. Static and Dynamic Experimental Investigation of a Pneumatic Open Loop Proportional Valve. Exp Tech 40, 1377–1385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-016-0142-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-016-0142-5

Keywords

Navigation