Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic resection. Aim of this study is to identify variables related to the development of POPF, analyze their clinical significance and discuss our current approach to the pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis. A series of 129 patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) have been analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: group F, 26 patients who have developed POPF; group NF, 103 patients who have not developed POPF. Demographic, clinical and intraoperative data were compared. Seventy-six patients had an end-to-side (ES) pancreatico-jejuno anastomosis, 53 an end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. Fifteen patients developed grade A fistulas, seven grade B, and four grade C; two patients with grade C fistula died from septic shock. Preoperative bile duct lithiasis, diameter of the pancreatic duct and consistency of the pancreatic stump were significantly different between F and NF groups at multivariate analysis. POPF has been related to clinical and biological parameters: preoperative bile duct lithiasis and challenging pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis (with small pancreatic duct and friable pancreatic stump) are the most prominent according to our experience. As the incidence of POPF seems to be related to technically demanding surgery, we presently reserve the EE anastomosis to the cases in which a friable gland or a very small duct will make a direct anastomosis on the pancreatic duct unreliable. In case of grade C fistulas a total spleen-preserving pancreatectomy should be considered an adequate treatment to prevent the onset of a multi-organ failure or a septic shock if no other treatment seems suitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Bolli M et al (2007) Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1699–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y et al (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2011) Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2053–2058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR et al (2009) Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 250:277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S et al (2003) Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:223–231 discussion 231–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, Grunwald Z, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ (1997) Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 113:983–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199(4):432–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y et al (1998) A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28:719–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. riskfactors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37(6):1405–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645 discussion 645–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES et al (2009) Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009:404520

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Pandey CM et al (2001) Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 71:511–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu CK, Mazo AE, Sarmiento JM et al (2010) Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 210:463–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malleo G, Mazzarella F, Malpaga A, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G (2013) Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 153(5):641–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe F, Noda H, Kamiyama H, Kato T, Kakizawa N, Ichida K, Toyama N, Konishi F (2012) Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(116):1270–1273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. You D, Jung K, Lee H, Heo J, Choi S, Choi D (2009) Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Pancreas 38(8):896–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu CC, Hwang CR, Yeh DC, Hwang YC, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Treatment for dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is resection of the residual pancreas necessary? Hepatogastroenterology 43(7):271–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Ferla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Carlis, L., Ferla, F., Di Sandro, S. et al. Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center. Updates Surg 66, 145–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0253-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0253-4

Keywords

Navigation