Abstract
Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) interventions may be one solution to improving the uptake of clinical guidelines. IKT research initiatives are particularly relevant for breast cancer research and initiatives targeting the implementation of clinical guidelines and guideline implementation initiatives, where collaboration with an interdisciplinary team of practitioners, patients, caregivers, and policy makers is needed for producing optimum patient outcomes. The objective of this paper was to describe the process of developing an IKT strategy that could be used by guideline developers to improve the uptake of their new clinical practice guidelines on breast cancer screening. An interprofessional group of students as well as two faculty members met six times over three days at the KT Canada Summer Institute in 2011. The team used all of the phases of the action cycle in the Knowledge to Action Framework as an organizing framework. While the entire framework was used, the step involving assessing barriers to knowledge use was judged to be particularly relevant in anticipating implementation problems and being able to inform the specific KT interventions that would be appropriate to mitigate these challenges and to accomplish goals and outcomes. This activity also underscored the importance of group process and teamwork in IKT. We propose that an a priori assessment of barriers to knowledge use (i.e., level and corresponding barriers), along with the other phases of the Knowledge to Action Framework, is a strategic approach for KT strategy development, implementation, and evaluation planning and could be used in the future planning of KT strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Institute of Medicine (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. National Academic, Washington, DC
Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J (1999) Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 318(7182):527–530
Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8(6):1–72, iii–iv
O’Connor PJ (2005) Adding value to evidence based clinical guidelines. JAMA 294(6):741–743
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465
Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, Brouwers M, Browman G, Cluzeau F, Philip T (2005) Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology. Int J Qual Health Care 17(2):123–132
Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P (2008) Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8:38
Brown LC, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, McAllister FA (2004) Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis. CMAJ 171(10):1189–1192
Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, Vale L (2006) Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966–1998. J Gen Intern Med 21(Suppl 2):S14–S20
Kendall E, Sunderland N, Muencheberger H, Armstrong K (2009) When guidelines need guidance: considerations and strategies for improving the adoption of chronic disease evidence by general practitioners. J Eval Clin Prac 15(6):1082–1090
Straus S, Graham I, Tetroe J (eds) (2009) Knowledge translation in health care. Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books, Wiley, Oxford
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2011) About knowledge translation—the KT portfolio at CIHR. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html. Accessed 1 March 2013
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N (2006) Lost in translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26(1):13–24
Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID (2011) Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making (2011). J Clin Epidemiol 64(1):6–10
Graham ID, Tetroe J; KT Theories Research Group (2007) Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med 14(11):936–941
Cabana MD, Rushton JL, Rush AJ (2002) Implementing practice guidelines for depression: applying a new framework to an old problem. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 24(1):35–42
Salmasian H, Freedberg DE, Abrams JA, Friedman C (2013) An automated tool for detecting medication overuse based on the electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 22(2):183–189
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE (2012) Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 7:50
Kastner M, Estey E, Bhattacharyya O (2011) Better guidelines for better care (2011). Enhancing the implementability of clinical practice guidelines. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11(3):315–324
Davies H, Powell A, Rushmer R (2007) Healthcare professionals’ views on clinician engagement in quality improvement: a literature review. Health Foundation, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Munce, S., Kastner, M., Cramm, H. et al. Applying the Knowledge to Action Framework to Plan a Strategy for Implementing Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines: an Interprofessional Perspective. J Canc Educ 28, 481–487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0490-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0490-0