Abstract
Universal screening of all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer tumors can identify individuals at high risk for Lynch syndrome (LS), a hereditary cancer syndrome predisposing carriers to increased risk of colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. To inform planning of a universal tumor screening program for LS in our jurisdiction, we undertook online surveys of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors to describe existing tumor screening programs. Online surveys were hosted on SurveyMonkey between October 2016 and March 2017. Fifty-three pathologists and 66 genetic counselors completed surveys (total n = 119). While attitudes towards tumor screening were positive, considerable variability was observed in the existence of tumor screening, test ordering criteria, and practices. Most respondents indicated consent was not obtained for tumor screening nor were educational materials provided to patients; however, opting out of additional mutation testing in the event of a positive tumor screen was endorsed. Results add to the growing literature on providers’ perspectives on population-based tumor screening programs and inform ways to offer these. Findings highlight the need to develop methods of patient education that allow meaningful opt-out decisions. The variability we observed also suggests the need for national standards and guidance on tumor screening for LS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrow E, Alduaij W, Robinson L, Shenton A, Clancy T, Lalloo F, Hill J, Evans DG (2008) Colorectal cancer in HNPCC: cumulative lifetime incidence, survival and tumour distribution. A report of 121 families with proven mutations. Clin Genet 74:233–242
Beamer L, Grant M, Espenschied C et al (2012) Reflex immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing of colorectal tumors for Lynch syndrome among US cancer programs and follow up of abnormal results. J Clin Oncol 30:1058–1063
Bellcross C, Bedrosian S, Daniels E et al (2012) Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meeting. Genet Med 14:152–162
Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Sorvari A, Daly C, Carroll JC, Kennedy E, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN (2017) Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: healthcare providers’ perspectives. Genet Med 19(5):568–574
Canadian Cancer Society (2017). Canadian Cancer Statistics 2017. Special topic: Pancreatic cancer http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=on; Accessed December 5, 2017
Canadian Cancer Society (2018). Canadian Cancer Statistics: a 2018 special report on cancer incidence by stage.. http://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/cancer%20information/cancer%20101/Canadian%20cancer%20statistics/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2018-EN.pdf?la=en; Accessed August 4, 2018
Chubak B, Heald B, Sharp R (2011) Informed consent to microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 13:356–360
Cohen S (2014) Current Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices: a survey of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 23:38–47
Colling R, Church DN, Carmichael J, Murphy L, East J, Risby P, Kerr R, Chetty R, Wang LM (2015) Screening for Lynch syndrome and referral to clinical genetics by selective mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry testing: an audit and cost analysis. J Clin Pathol 68:1036–1039
Cross D, Rahm A, Kauffman T, CERGEN Study Team et al (2013) Underutilization of Lynch syndrome screening in a multisite study of patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 15:933–940
De la Chapelle A (2003) Microsatellite instability. N Engl J Med 349:209–210
EGAPP Working Group (2009) Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Genet Med 11:35–41
Ferguson S, Aronson M, Pollett A et al (2014) Performance characteristics of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who have undergone universal germline mutation testing. Cancer 120:3932–3939
Frolova A, Babb S, Zantow E et al (2015) Impact of an immunohistochemistry-based universal screening protocol for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer on genetic counseling and testing. Gynecol Oncol 137:7–13
Green R, Green J, Buehler S et al (2007) Very high incidence of familial colorectal cancer in Newfoundland: a comparison with Ontario and 13 other population-based studies. Familial Cancer 6:53–62
Hampel H (2009) Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 18:687–703
Hampel H, Frankel W, Martin E et al (2005) Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med 352:1851–1860
Hampel H, Frankel W, Panescu J, Lockman J, Sotamaa K, Fix D, Comeras I, la Jeunesse J, Nakagawa H, Westman JA, Prior TW, Clendenning M, Penzone P, Lombardi J, Dunn P, Cohn DE, Copeland L, Eaton L, Fowler J, Lewandowski G, Vaccarello L, Bell J, Reid G, de la Chapelle A (2006) Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Res 66:7810–7818
Hampel H, Frankel W, Martin E et al (2008) Feasibility of screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:5783–5788
Hill A, Sumra K, Russell M et al (2015) A single institution experience in compliance with universal screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:543–550
Hunter J, Zepp J, Gilmore M et al (2015) Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers. Cancer 121:3281–3290
Jarvinen H, Aarnio M, Mustonen H et al (2000) Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. GastroEnterology 118:829–834
Jarvinen H, Renokonen-Sinisalo L, Aktan-Collan K et al (2009) Ten years after mutation testing for Lynch syndrome: cancer incidence and outcome in mutation-positive and mutation-negative family members. J Clin Oncol 27:4793–4797
Kalloger S, Ghassan A, Mulligan A et al (2012) Use of mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing: exploring Canadian practices. Am J Surg Pathol 36:560–569
Karlitz J, Hsieh M, Liu Y et al (2015) Population-based Lynch syndrome screening by microsatellite instability prior to colon surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 110:948–955
Kidambi T, Lee R, Terdiman J, Day L (2016) Successful implementation of Lynch syndrome screening in a safety net institution. J Community Genet 7:255–260
Lynch H, Lynch P, Lanspa S, Snyder C, Lynch F, Boland C (2009) Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clin Genet 76:1–18
Mange S, Bellcross C, Cragun D, Duquette D, Gorman L, Hampel H, Jasperson K (2015) Creation of a network to promote universal screening for Lynch syndrome: the Lynch Syndrome Screening Network. J Genet Couns 24:421–427
Manne S, Meropol N, Weinberg D et al (2010) Facilitating informed decisions regarding microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1366–1372
Marquez E, Geng Z, Pass S, Summerour P, Robinson L, Sarode V, Gupta S (2013) Implementation of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in university and safety-net health system settings: successes and challenges. Genet Med 15(12):925–932
Mills A, Liou S, Ford J et al (2014) Lynch syndrome screening should be considered for all patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 38(11):1501–1509
Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, de la Chapelle A, Hampel H, Aaltonen LA, Hopper JL, le Marchand L, Gallinger S, Newcomb PA, Haile R, Thibodeau SN, Gunawardena S, Jenkins MA, Buchanan DD, Potter JD, Baron JA, Ahnen DJ, Moreno V, Andreu M, Ponz de Leon M, Rustgi AK, Castells A, EPICOLON Consortium (2012) Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 308:1555–1565
Mvundura M, Grosse S, Hampel H, Palomaki G (2010) The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 12:93–104
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2012). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colorectal cancer screening (v2.2012). http://www.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/colorectal/english/colorectal_screening.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2015
Parfrey P, Dicks E, Parfrey O et al (2017) Evaluation of a population-based approach to familial colorectal cancer. Clin Genet 91:672–682
Peres J (2010) To screen or not to screen for Lynch syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1382–1384
Rodriguez-Bigas M, Boland C, Hamilton S et al (1997) A National Cancer Institute Workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1758–1762
Sanchez J, Vogel J, Kalady M et al (2008) Identifying Lynch syndrome: we are all responsible. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1750–1756
Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23:334–340
Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 33:77–84
Schneider J, Davis J, Kauffman T et al (2016) Stakeholder perspectives on implementing a university Lynch syndrome screening program: a qualitative study of early barriers and facilitators. Genet Med 18(2):152–161
South C, Yearsley M, Martin E et al (2009) Immunohistochemistry staining for the mismatch repair proteins in the clinical care of patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 11:812–817
Stoffel E, Mukherjee B, Raymond V et al (2009) Calculation of risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer among patients with Lynch syndrome. GastroEnterology 137:1621–1627
Tomiak E, Samson A, Spector N, Mackey M, Gilpin C, Smith E, Jonker D, Allanson J, Asmis T (2014) Relfex testing for Lynch syndrome: if we build it, will they come? Lessons learned from the uptake of clinical genetic services by individuals with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Familial Cancer 13:75–82
Umar A, Boland C, Terdiman J et al (2004) Revised Bethesda guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:261–268
Vasen H, Mecklin J, Khan P, Lynch H (1991) The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 34:424–425
Vasen H, Watson P, Mecklin J, Lynch H (1999) New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. GastroEnterology 116:1453–1456
Ward R, Hicks S, Hawkins N (2013) Population-based molecular screening for Lynch syndrome: implications for personalized medicine. J Clin Oncol 31:2554–2562
Watson P, Vasen H, Mecklin J et al (2008) The risk of extra-colonic, extra endometrial cancer in the Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer 123:444–449
Weissman S, Bellcross C, Bittner C et al (2011) Genetic counseling considerations in the evaluation of families for Lynch syndrome—a review. J Genet Couns 20:5–19
Williams J, Williams M (2011) Informed consent and immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 13:848–849
Woods M, Younghusband B, Parfrey P et al (2010) The genetic basis of colorectal cancer in a population-based incident cohort with a high rate of familial disease. Gut 59:1369–1377
Wright D, Arnold J, Parry B et al (2011) Immunohistochemistry to detect hereditary polyposis colorectal cancer in young patients: the 7-year Auckland experience. Dis Colon Rectum 54:552–558
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to respondents who completed surveys and to Nic Fairbridge of the Health Research Unit, Memorial University, for assistance with data analysis.
Funding
Funding for this project was provided through a grant to Etchegary from the Dean’s Innovation Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Board (Ref No. 16.062), St. John’s, NL, Canada. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (Canadian Cancer Society 2017). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dicks, E., Pullman, D., Kao, K. et al. Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: perspectives of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors. J Community Genet 10, 335–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0398-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0398-9