Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Production of a Mixture of Fengycins with Surfactant and Antifungal Activities by Bacillus sp. MA04, a Versatile PGPR

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacillus sp. strain MA04 a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) showed hemolytic activity on blood agar plates, and the supernatant from liquid culture in nutrient broth at 24 h exhibited emulsification activity, suggesting the production of biosurfactants. In antagonist assays, the supernatant showed antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi such as Penicillium expansum, Fusarium stilboides, Sclerotium rolfsii y Rhizoctonia solani, finding a reduction of mycelial growth of all fungi tested, ranging from 35 to 69%, this activity was increased with time of culture, accomplishing percentages of inhibition up to 85% with supernatants obtained at 72 h. Then, the crude biorsurfactant (CB) was isolated from the supernatant in order to assay its antagonistic effect on the phytopathogens previously tested, finding an increase in the inhibition up to 97% at 500 mg/L of CB. The composition of CB was determined by infrared spectroscopy, identifying various functional groups related to lipopeptides, which were purified by high-performance liquid chromatography and analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF–MS, revealing a mixture of fengycins A and B whose high antifungal activity is been widely recognized. These results show that PGPR Bacillus sp. MA04 could also contribute to plant health status through the production of metabolites with antimicrobial activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De-Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia MP (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38:401–419. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420150053

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Duan G, Christian N, Schwachtje J, Walther D (2013) The metabolic interplay between plants and phytopathogens. Metabolites 3:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo3010001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharp RG (2013) A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy 3:757–793. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3040757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Y, Xu Z, Ling N, Yuan Y (2012) Isolation and identification of lipopeptides produced by B. subtilis SQR 9 for suppressing Fusarium wilt of cucumber. Sci Hort 135:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luna ML, Martínez PRA, Hernández IM, Arvizu MSM (2013) Characterization of rhizobacteria isolated from tomato and their effect on tomato and bell pepper growth. Rev Fit Mex 36:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  7. Velázquez RR, Contreras CHA, Macías RL, Hernández MA (2011) Role of the 4-phosphopantetheinyl transferase of Trichoderma virens in secondary metabolism and induction of plant defense responses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1459–1471. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-02-11-0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sánchez VSE, Martínez PRA, Castillo TJ, Fernández EE (2008) Antagonismo de levaduras nativas contra la pudrición azul (Penicillium expansum Link) en frutos de manzana. Rev Fitotec Mex 31:359–366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandoval CRA, Martínez PRA, Hernández IM, Fernández EE (2011) Control biológico y químico contra Fusarium stilboides en pimiento morrón (Capsicum annuum L.) en poscosecha. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 17:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Issazadeh K, Kazemi RS, Zarrabi S, Reza RM (2012) Antagonism of Bacillus species against Xhantomonas campestris pv. Campestris and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. Carotovorum. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:1615–1620. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.075

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu Z, Zhang J, Wu Y, Ran W (2013) Comparative study on the properties of lipopeptide products and expression of biosynthetic genes from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in liquid fermentation and solid-state fermentation and solid-state fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:2105–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1375-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kishore GK, Pande S, Podile AR (2005) Biological control of collar rot disease with broad-spectrum antifungal bacteria associated with groundnut. Can J Microbiol 51:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1139/w04-119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher AA, Labenski MT, Monks TJ, Lau SS (2011) Utilization of MALDI-TOF to determine chemical protein adduct formation in vitro. In: Jean CG (ed) Drug safety evaluation. Humana Press, India, pp 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper DG, Goldeberg BG (1987) Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl Envion Microbiol 53:224–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rattes ACC, Marques AV, Montezano MJ, De Azevedo DJ (2015) Exploiting the aerobic endospore-forming bacterial diversity in saline and hypersaline environments for biosurfactant production. BMC Microbiol 15:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0575-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Velho RV, Medina FC, Segalin J, Brandelli A (2011) Production of lipopeptides among Bacillus strains showing growth inhibition of phytopathogenic fungi. Folia Microbiol 56:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-011-0056-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Sheshtawy HS, Aiad I, Osman ME, Abo-Elnasr AA (2015) Production of biosurfactant from Bacillus licheniformis for microbial enhance oil recovery and inhibition the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria. Egypt J Petrol 24:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walter V, Syldartk C, Hausmann R (2010) Screening concepts for the isolation of biosurfactant producing microorganisms. In: Sen R (ed) Biosurfactants. Springer, New York, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5979-9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gudiña EJ, Fernandes EC, Rodrigues AI, Teixeira JA (2015) Biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis using corn steep liquor as culture medium. Front Microbiol 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00059

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varadavenkatesan T, Murty VR (2013) Production of a lipopeptide biosurfactant by a novel Bacillus sp. and its applicability to enhanced oil recovery. ISRN Microbiol 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/621519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen H, Wang L, Su CX, Gong GH (2008) Isolation and characterization of lipopeptide antibiotics produced by Bacillus subtilis. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02412.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang H, Li X, Li X, Yu H (2015) Identification of lipopeptide isoforms by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS based on the simultaneous purification of iturin, fengycin, and surfactin by RP-HPLC. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:2529–2542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8486-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pathak KV, Keharia H (2014) Application of extracellular lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by endophytic Bacillus subtilis K1 isolated from aerial roots of banyan (Ficus benghalensis) in microbially enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). 3. Biotech 4:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0119-3

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bin HL, Qi SZ, Zhang T, Min YZ (2007) Fengycin antibiotics isolated from B-FS01 culture inhibit the growth of Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon ATCC 38932. FEMS Microbiol Lett 272:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00743.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sachdev DP, Cameotra SS (2013) Biosurfactants in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4641-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar SA, Singh CS (2013) Efficiency of lipopeptide biosurfactants in removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals from contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1752-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support provided by “Fondo de Vinculación—Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro”, and we wish to thank both Dra. Alicia Chagolla López and Dra. Yolanda Rodríguez Aza for their invaluable support in the chromatographic and MALDITOF/TOF analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan-Ramiro Pacheco-Aguilar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Morales, A., Martínez-Peniche, RA., Arvizu-Gómez, Jl. et al. Production of a Mixture of Fengycins with Surfactant and Antifungal Activities by Bacillus sp. MA04, a Versatile PGPR. Indian J Microbiol 58, 208–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0711-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0711-7

Keywords

Navigation