Skip to main content
Log in

Splitting hairs: differentiating between entomological activity, taphonomy, and sharp force trauma on hair

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The analysis of hair can provide useful information for the correct evaluation of forensic cases, but studies of trauma on hair are extremely rare. Hair may present lesions caused by traumatic events or by animals: in fact, signs of sharp force weapons on hair may provide important information for the reconstruction of the manner of death, and, for example, may suggest fetishist practice. This study stemmed from a judicial case where it was fundamental to distinguish between sharp force lesions and insect activity on hair.

Methods

In order to highlight differences between sharp force lesions and insect feeding activity, different experiments were performed with high power microscopy: hair samples were subjected to several lesions by blunt and sharp force trauma; then samples were used as pabulum for two taxa of insects: the common clothes moth (Tineola bisselliella Lepidoptera, Tineidae) and the carpet beetle (Anthrenus sp., Coleoptera, Dermestidae). Hairs were examined from a macroscopic and microscopic point of view by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM): the morphological characteristics of the lesions obtained from the different experimental samples were compared.

Results

Results show that sharp force trauma produces lesions with regular edges, whereas insects leave concave lesions caused by their “gnawing” activity. These two types of lesions are easily distinguishable from breaking and tearing using SEM.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that insect activity leaves very specific indications on hair and sheds some light on different hair lesions that may be found in forensic cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Boumba VA, Ziavrou KS, Vougiouklakis T. Hair as a biological indictor of drug use, drug abuse or chronic exposure to enviromental toxicants. Int J Toxicol. 2006;25(3):143–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horvath AL. Solubility of structurally complicated materials: 3. Hair. The Scientific World J. 2009;9:255–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson J. Forensic examination of hair. 1st ed. London: CRC Press; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson AS, Tobin DJ. Hair after death. In: Trüeb RM, Tobin DJ, editors. Aging hair. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 249–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kafka MP. The DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilia not otherwise specified. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:373–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kafka MP. The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scorolli C, Ghirlanda S, Enquist M, Zanotti S, Jannini EA. Relative prevalence of different fetishes. Int J Imp Res. 2007;19:432–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson VNE. A study of damaged hair. J Soc Cosm Chem. 1976;27:155–61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii T, Ito Y, Watanabe T, Kawasoe T. Effects of ossidative treatments on human hair keratin films. J Cosmet Sci. 2012;63(1):15–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hearle JW, Lomas B, Cooke WD. Atlas of fibre fracture and damage to textiles. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CRC Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabino Massa E, Masali M. Early Egyptian mummy hairs: tensile strength tests, optical and scanning electron microscope observation. A paleobiological research. J Human Evol. 1980;9:133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rowe WF. Biodegradation of hairs and fibers in forensic taphonomy. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. The postmortem fate of human remains. Florida: CRC Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ogle RR, Fox MJ. Atlas of human hair microscopic characteristics. Florida: CRC Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allsopp D, Seal KJ. Introduction to biodeterioration. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taupin JM, Adolf FP, Robertson J. Examination of damage to textiles. In: Robertson J, Grieve M, editors. Forensic examination of fibres. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Gaetano DH, Kempton JB, Rowe WF. Fungal tunneling of hair from a buried body. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1048–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang BS, Hong WS, Lee E, Yeo SM, Bang IS, Chung YH, Lim DS, Mun GH, Kim J, Park SO, Shin DH. Ultramicroscopic observations on morphological changes in hair during 25 years of weathering. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;151(2–3):193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson AS, Dodson HI, Janaway RC, Pollard AM, Tobin DJ. Selective biodegradation in hair shafts derived from archaeological, forensic and experimental contexts. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(3):450–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson AS, Dodson HI, Janaway RC, Pollard AM, Tobin DJ. Evaluating histological methods for assessing hair fibre degradation. Archaeometry. 2010;52:467–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson J. Forensic and microscopic examination of human hair. In: Robertson J, editor. Forensic examination of hair. London: CRC Press; 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdulina EV, Mal’tsev AE. Evaluation of hair injuries depending on properties of impact surface of a blunt object and impact conditions. Sud Med Ekspert. 2007;50(2):9–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichs KJ. Forensic osteology—advances in the identification of human remains. USA: Charles C. Thomas; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Love JC, Derrick SM, Wiersema JM, Peters C. Validation of tool mark analysis of cut costal cartilage. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debora Mazzarelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzarelli, D., Vanin, S., Gibelli, D. et al. Splitting hairs: differentiating between entomological activity, taphonomy, and sharp force trauma on hair. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11, 104–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9636-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9636-6

Keywords

Navigation