Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of salts in medium for production of carboxymethylcellulase by a psychrophilic marine bacterium, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 using two statistical methods

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concentration of four mineral salts in the medium for the production of carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) by Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 were optimized using orthogonal array method (OAM) and response surface method (RSM) and their results from two statistical methods were compared. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of data from central composite design (CCD) based on OAM indicated that potassium phosphate gave the highest percentage participation for cell growth as well as production of CMCase. However, their relative participations of four salts for cell growth were different from those for production of CMCase. The ANOVA of results from RSM indicated that highly significant factors (“probe>F” less than 0.0001) for cell growth were K2HPO4 and (NH4)2SO4, whereas those for production of CMCase were K2HPO4, NaCl, and MgSO4·7H2O. The optimal concentration of K2HPO4, NaCl, MgSO4·7H2O, and (NH4)2SO4 for cell growth extracted by Design Expert Software based on RSM were 7.10, 0.84, 0.24, and 0.33 g/L, respectively, whereas those for production of CMCase were 3.00, 0.52, 0.34, and 0.45 g/L. The optimal concentrations of salts for cell growth and production of CMCase using RSM basically coincided with those using OAM as well as those from ‘one-factor-at-a-time’ method. The production of CMCase by P. aquimaris LBH-10 with optimized concentrations of salts was 273.0 U/mL, which was enhanced by 1.27 times higher than the previous report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. C. Yi, J. C. Sandra, A. B. John and T. C. Shu, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 553 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ballesteros, J. M. Oliva, M. J. Negro, P. Manzanares and I. Ballesteros, Process Biochem., 39, 1843 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. K. Sukumaran, R.R. Singhania, G. M. Mathew and A. Pandey, Renew. Energy, 34, 421 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. J. Kim, Y. J. Lee, W. Gao, Chung, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 16, 542 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. P. Niranjane, P. Madhou and T.W. Stevenson, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 40, 1464 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Chi, Z. Chi, T. Zhang, G. Liu, J. Li and X. Wang, Biotechnol. Adv., 27, 236 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. Rasmussnen and M. Morrissey, Adv. Food Nut. Res., 52, 237 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. J. Kim, W. Gao, Y. J. Lee, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, J. Life Sci., 20, 487 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Mawadza, R. Hatti-Kaul, R. Zvauya and B. Mattiasson, J. Biotechnol., 83, 177 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Gavaco-Paulo, Carbohydr. Polym., 37, 273 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. D. Cui. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27, 174 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Li, J. Xing, W. Li, X. Xiong, X. Li and H. Liu, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 781 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Azin, M. Moravej and D. Zareh, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 40, 801 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Sen, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 68, 263 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. H. Lee, B. K. Kim, Y. J. Lee, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 46, 38 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. K. Kim, B. H. Lee, Y. J. Lee, I.H. Jin, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 44, 411 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. I. Khuri and J. A. Cornell, Response surfaces: Design and analysis, New York, Marcel Dekker (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Gao, Y. J. Lee, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 837 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. I. H. Jin, D.Y. Jung, C.W. Son, S. K. Kim, W. Gao, C. H. Chung and J.W. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioproces Eng., 16, 245 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. K. Lee, Y. B. Jo, I. H. Jin, C.W. Son and J.W. Lee, J. Life Sci., 19, 1033 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kalogiannis, G. Iakovidou, M. Liakopoulos-Kyriakides, D. A. Kyriakidis and G. N. Skaracis, Process Biochem., 39, 249 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. A. Jaleel, P. Manivannan, G.M. A. Lakshmanan, R. Sridharan and R. Panneerselvam, Comp. Rend. Biol., 330, 806 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. R. Senthikumar, A. Ashokkumar, K. C. Raj and P. Cunasekraran, Bioresour. Technol., 96, 1380 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Hongwen, F. Baishan and H. Zongding, Biochem. Eng. J., 25, 47 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. J. Lee, B. K. Kim, B. H. Lee, K. I. Jo, N. K. Lee, C.H. Chung, Y. C. Lee and J.W. Lee, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 378 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Woo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, HJ., Lee, YJ., Gao, W. et al. Optimization of salts in medium for production of carboxymethylcellulase by a psychrophilic marine bacterium, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 using two statistical methods. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 384–391 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0192-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0192-4

Key words

Navigation