Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgery for Nonobese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Interventional Study with Duodenal–Jejunal Exclusion

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A 24-week interventional prospective trial was performed to compare the benefits of open duodenal–jejunal exclusion surgery (GJB) with a matched control group on standard medical care.

Methods

One-hundred eighty patients were screened for the surgical approach. Twelve patients accepted to be operated and presented the full eligibility criteria for surgery that includes overweight BMI (25–29.9 kg/m2), T2DM diagnosis for less than 15 years, insulin-treated patients, no history of major complications, preserved beta-cell function, and absence of autoimmunity. A matched control group (CG) of patients whom refused surgical treatment was placed to receive standard care. Patients had age of 50 (5) years, time of diagnosis 9 years (range, 3 to 15 years), time of insulin usage 6 months (range, 3 to 48 months), fasting glucose (FG), 9.8 (2.5) mg/dL, and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) 8.90 (2.12)%.

Results

At 24 weeks after surgery, patients experienced greater reductions on FG (14% vs. 7% on CG), A1C (from 8.78 to 7.84 in GJB—p < 0.01 and 8.93 to 8.71 in CG; p < 0.05 between groups) and reductions on average daily insulin requirement (93% vs. 29%, p < 0.01). Ten patients stopped insulin usage in GJB but they remain taking oral medications. No differences were observed in both groups regarding BMI, body distribution and composition, blood pressure, and lipids.

Conclusions

In conclusion, duodenal–jejunal exclusion was an effective treatment for nonobese T2DM subjects. GJB was superior to standard care in achieving better glycemic control along with reduction in insulin requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on Type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med. 2007;24:451–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature. 2001;414(6865):782–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects. Endocr Rev. 1998;19:477–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrannini E, Camastra S, Gastaldelli A, et al. Beta-cell function in obesity: effects of weight loss. Diabetes. 2004;53(Suppl 3):S26–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donath MY, Schumann DM, Faulenbach M, et al. Islet inflammation in type 2 diabetes: from metabolic stress to therapy. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(Suppl 2):S161–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Knop F, Vilsbøll T, Højberg PV, et al. Reduced incretin effect in type 2 diabetes. Cause or consequence of the diabetic state? Diabetes. 2007;56:1951–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubino F, Gagner M. Potential of surgery for curing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:554–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Pareja JC, et al. The insulin tolerance test in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Res. 2001;9:763–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings DE, Flum DR. Gastrointestinal surgery as a treatment for diabetes. JAMA. 2008;299:341–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006;244:741–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guidone C, Manco M, Valera-Mora E, et al. Mechanisms of recovery from type 2 diabetes after malabsorptive bariatric surgery. Diabetes. 2006;55:2025–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubino F, Marescaux J. Effect of duodenal-jejunal exclusion in a non-obese animal model of type 2 diabetes: a new perspective for an old disease. Ann Surg. 2004;239:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pacheco D, de Luis DA, Romero A, et al. The effects of duodenal-jejunal exclusion on hormonal regulation of glucose metabolism in Goto-Kakizaki rats. Am J Surg. 2007;194:221–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malerbi D, Damiani D, Rassi N, et al. Brazilian Diabetes Society consensus statement—intensive insulin therapy and insulin pump therapy. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50:125–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: A consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1963–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis KJ, Bell SJ, Chertow GM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance methods in clinical research: a follow-up to the NIH Technology Assessment Conference. Nutrition. 1999;15:874–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Consensus Committee. Consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the hemoglobin A1C measurement: the American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and the International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2399–2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cummings DE, Overduin J, Foster-Schubert KE. Gastric bypass for obesity: mechanisms of weight loss and diabetes resolution. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2608–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morínigo R, Lacy AM, Casamitjana R, et al. GLP-1 and changes in glucose tolerance following gastric bypass surgery in morbidly obese subjects. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1594–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moses LE. Measuring effects without randomized trials? Options, problems, challenges. Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS8–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen RV, Schiavon CA, Pinheiro JS, et al. Duodenal-jejunal bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with body mass index of 22–34 kg/m2: a report of 2 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(2):195–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. The action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes study group. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Deitel M. Surgery for diabetes at lower BMI: Some caution. Obes Surg. 2008;18(10):1211–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Geloneze.

Additional information

Sponsor: Ethicon EndoSurgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geloneze, B., Geloneze, S.R., Fiori, C. et al. Surgery for Nonobese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Interventional Study with Duodenal–Jejunal Exclusion. OBES SURG 19, 1077–1083 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9844-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9844-4

Keywords

Navigation