Abstract
Background
Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an alternative to gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (GB).
Methods
From January 2004 to January 2006, 111 patients with a follow-up longer than 24 months were prospectively followed. Three treatment groups were defined. Sleeve gastrectomy as first procedure (SGFP; n = 50), sleeve gastrectomy after failure of GB (SG after GB; n = 9) and GB (n = 52). We compared morbidity, mortality, length of stay, number of procedures under general anaesthesia, excess weight loss (EWL) and quality of life.
Results
Mean initial body mass index (BMI) was 50.4 (SG), 50.8 (SG after GB) and 43.8 (GB; p = 0.000001). Mean operating time was 97.1 min (SGFP), 122.2 min (SG after GB) and 69.8 min (GB; p < 0.0001). The reoperation rate under general anaesthesia was 2% (SGFP), 11% (SG after GB) and 30.76% (GB; p = 0.00001).The fistula rate was 2% (SGFP), 0% (SG after GB) and 0% (GB). BMI at 24 months was 33.8 (SGFP), 35.3 (SG after GB) and 33.2 (GB; NS). EWL at 24 months was 67.4 (SGFP), 60.3 (SG after GB) and 58.6 (GB; NS). In the SGFP group and in the SG after GB group, the mean quality-of-life score was 1.1. In the GB group, the mean score was 0.95 (NS).
Conclusions
Initial BMI was significantly higher in the SG group but was no longer significantly different from the BMI of the GB group at 12 and 24 months. Excess BMI loss was higher after SG than after GB. This reduction of BMI was considered to be a success for GB. Thus, results of SG should be considered as a success. Quality of life was not significantly different between the three groups. These results validated SG as first procedure or after failure of GB.
References
de Saint Pol T. Obésité et milieux sociaux en France: les inégalités augmentent. Bull Epid Hebdo. 2008;20:175–9.
Ginter E, Simko V. Adult obesity at the beginning of the 21st century: epidemiology, pathophysiology and health risk. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109:224–30.
Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008;18:487–96.
Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885–93.
Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, et al. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009;145:106–13.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–92.
Braghetto I, Korn O, Valladares H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical technique, indications and clinical results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1442–50.
Almogy G, Crookes PF, Anthone GJ. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg. 2004;14:492–7.
Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1030–3.
Nocca D, Aggarwal R, Blanc P, et al. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. A multicenter prospective study of 200 procedures. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:870–4.
Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.
Leonetti F, Silecchia G, Iacobellis G, et al. Different plasma ghrelin levels after laparoscopic gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding in morbid obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4227–31.
Himpens J, De Bilde D, Cadière GB. La gastroplastie par anneau comparée à la gastrectomie en manche (sleeve gastrectomie) dans le traitement de l'obésité chez le non sweat-eater. J Coelio Chir. 2004;50:48–56.
Uglioni B, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, et al. Midterm results, of primary vs. secondary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated operation. Obes Surg. 2009;19:401–6.
Müller MK, Wenger C, Schiesser M, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery—a comparative study of laparoscopic banding vs. bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1551–7.
Ballantyne GH. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13:954–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors disclose any commercial interest in the subject of the study and in the source of any support.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabbagh, C., Verhaeghe, P., Dhahri, A. et al. Two-Year Results on Morbidity, Weight Loss and Quality of Life of Sleeve Gastrectomy as First Procedure, Sleeve Gastrectomy After Failure of Gastric Banding and Gastric Banding. OBES SURG 20, 679–684 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0007-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0007-4