Skip to main content
Log in

Quality assessment and shelf life prediction of spray dried tamarind pulp powder in accelerated environment using two different packaging materials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tamarind pulp powder (TPP) was produced using optimum spray drying conditions, packed in two different packaging materials viz., aluminium laminated polyethylene (ALP) and 4-ply laminate pouches (polythene-aluminium-polythene-paper) and stored under accelerated conditions (40 ± 1 °C temperature, 90 % relative humidity). The powder was analyzed for various quality parameters (moisture content, color, acidity, and powder flowability) at an interval of 7 days upto 70 days of storage period. Both packaging material and storage period showed significant effect on the powder properties. Kinetic study of color change of tamarind pulp powder during storage revealed that color change followed zero order reaction kinetics with a rate constant of 0.495 and 0.369 for the powder packed in ALP and 4-ply laminate, respectively. The magnitude of quality changes of TPP measured during accelerated storage suggested that 4-ply laminate was better than ALP for long term storage of spray dried TPP. The shelf life of TPP under accelerated storage condition was predicted on the basis of flowability of the powder and was calculated to be 53 and 66 days in ALP and 4-ply laminate, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Obulesu, S. Bhattacharya, Int J Food Prop 14, 538–549 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. De Caluwe, K. Halamov, P. Van Damme, African natural plant products: discoveries and challenges in quality control, in Quality control, ed. by H.R. Juliani, J.E. Simon, Chi-Thong Ho (American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 2009), pp. 85–110

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. El-Siddig, H.P.M. Gunasena, B.A. Prasa, D.K.N.G. Pushpakumara, K.V.R. Ramana, P. Vijayanand, J.T. Williams, in Tamarind—Tamarindus indica L. Fruits for the future 1, (Southampton Centre for Underutilized Crops, Southampton, 2006)

  4. A.L. Khandare, G.S. Rao, N. Lakshmaiah, Euro J Clin Nutri 56, 82–85 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Muzaffar, P. Kumar, Drying Technol 34, 142–148 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.N. Bhusari, K. Muzaffar, P. Kumar, Powder Technol 266, 354–364 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S.Y. Quek, N.K. Chok, P. Swedlund, Chem Eng Process 46, 386–392 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Muzaffar, P. Kumar, Powder Technol 279, 179–184 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Escobedo-Avellaneda, G. Velazquez, J.A. Torres, J. Welti-Chanes, Inclusion of the variability of model parameters on shelf-life estimations for low and intermediate moisture vegetables. LWT-Food Sci Technol 47, 364–370 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. C.A. Breda, E.J. Sanjinez-Argandona, C. de AC Correia, Food Chem 135, 2960–2964 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Garcia-Garcia, A. Lopez-Lopez, A. Garrido-Fernandez, J Food Eng 84, 569–575 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Sanjuan, J. Bom, G. Clemente, A. Mulet, Changes in the quality of dehydrated broccoli florets during storage. J Food Eng 62, 15–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Muzaffar, P. Kumar, Conceptual framework & innovations, in Agroecology and food sciences, ed. by G.C. Mishra (Krishi Sanskriti Publications, New Delhi, 2015), pp. 65–67

    Google Scholar 

  14. AOAC, 19th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, 2012)

  15. S. Rangana, Hand book of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetable products, 2nd edn. (Tata McGraw Hall Publishing Company Lid, New Delhi, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Muzaffar, P. Kumar, Drying Technol (2015). doi:10.1080/07373937.2015.1080724

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Kumar, H.N. Mishra, Int J Dairy Technol 59, 22–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Greenspan, Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand 81, 89–96 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Crank, The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Jaya, H. Das, J Food Process Preserv 29, 45–62 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.K. Chauhan, V. Patil, Powder Technol 239, 86–93 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Liu, X. Cao, H. Wang, X. Liao, Powder Technol 204, 159–166 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Janjatovic, M. Benkovic, S. Srecec, D. Jezek, I. Spoljaric, I. Bauman, Adv Powder Technol 23, 620–631 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.A.J.S. Van Bockel, J Food Sci 61, 477–489 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Muzaffar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muzaffar, K., Kumar, P. Quality assessment and shelf life prediction of spray dried tamarind pulp powder in accelerated environment using two different packaging materials. Food Measure 11, 265–271 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9393-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9393-1

Keywords

Navigation