Abstract
The grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) and microstructure in 9Cr-1Mo ferritic/martensitic steel subjected to different heat treatments and thermomechanical treatments (TMTs) have been evaluated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique. Microstructures obtained through displacive transformation of high-temperature austenite yielded higher amounts of Σ1-29 coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries (from 29 to 38 pct) compared with the ferrite grains obtained by diffusional transformation (~16 pct) or by recrystallization process (~14 pct). Specifically, the low-angle (Σ1), Σ3, Σ11, and Σ25b boundaries were enhanced in the tempered martensite substructure, whereas the prior austenite grain boundaries were largely of random type. Misorientation between the product ferrite variants for ideal orientation relationships during austenite transformation was calculated and compared with CSL misorientation to find its proximity based on Brandon’s criteria. The observed enhancements in Σ1, Σ3, and Σ11 could be interpreted based on Kurdjumov–Sachs (K–S) relation, but Nishiyama–Wassermann (N–W) relation was needed to understand Σ25b formation. The amounts of CSL boundaries in the tempered martensite structure were not significantly influenced by austenite grain size or the kinetics of martensitic transformation. In mixed microstructures of “polygonal ferrite + tempered martensite”, the frequencies of CSL boundaries were found to systematically decrease with increasing amounts of diffusional/recrystallized ferrite.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.L. Klueh: Int. Mater. Rev., 2005, vol. 50 no. 5, pp. 425-32.
F.W. Noble, B.A. Senior and B.L. Eyre: Acta Metall. Mater., 1990, vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 709-17.
I. Olefjord: Int. Met. Rev., 1978, vol. 4, pp. 149-63.
T. Watanabe: J. Mater. Sci., 2011, vol. 46, pp. 4095-4115.
D.G. Brandon: Acta Metall., 1966, vol. 14, pp. 1479-84.
T. Watanabe, H. Fujii, H. Oikawa and K.I. Arai: Acta Metall., 1989, vol. 37 no. 3, pp. 941-52.
A.P. Sutton and R.W. Balluffi: Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
V. Randle: Acta Mater., 1997, vol. 46 no. 5, pp. 1459-80.
P. Lejček, S. Hofmann, V. Paidar : Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 3951-3963.
V. Randle: Acta Mater., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 4067-81.
S.Q. Cao, J.X. Zhang, J.S. Wu, L. Wang and J.G. Chen: Mater. Sci. Engg. A, 2005, vol. 392A, pp. 203-08.
T. Watanabe and S. Tsurekawa: Acta Mater., 1999, vol. 47 no. 15, pp. 4171-85.
S. Tsurekawa, K. Okamoto, K. Kawahara and T. Watanabe: J. Mater. Sci., 2005, vol. 40, pp. 895-901.
H. Kitahara, R. Ueji, N. Tsuji and Y. Minamino: Acta Mater., 2006, vol. 54, pp.1279-88.
S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara and T. Maki: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 1789-99.
B. Sonderegger, S. Mitsche and H. Cerjak: Mater. Charact., 2007, vol. 58, pp. 874-82.
J.J. Sanchez-Hanton and R.C. Thomson: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vols. 460A–461A, pp. 261–67.
G. Gupta, B. Alexandreanu and G.S. Was: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2004, vol. 35A, pp. 717-19.
G. Gupta, P. Ampornrat, X. Ren, K. Sridharan, T.R. Allen and G.S. Was: J. Nucl. Mater., 2007, vol. 361, pp. 160-73.
T. Karthikeyan, V. Thomas Paul, S.K. Mishra, S. Saroja, M. Vijayalakshmi and I. Samajdar: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40A, pp. 2030–32.
F.B. Pickering and A.D. Vassiliou: Met. Technol. 1980, vol. 7, pp. 409-13.
P. Parameswaran, S. Saroja, M. Vijayalakshmi and V.S. Raghunathan: J. Nucl. Mater., 1996, vol. 232, pp. 226-32.
T. Karthikeyan, V. Thomas Paul, S. Saroja, A. Moitra, G. Sasikala and M. Vijayalakshmi: J. Nucl. Mater., 2011, vol. 419, pp. 256–62.
F.J. Humphreys : J. Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 36, pp. 3833-54.
V. Randle: Int. Mater. Rev., 2004, vol. 49 no. 1, pp. 1-11.
V. Randle: Mater. Charact., 2009, vol. 60, pp. 913-22.
Y. He, S. Godet and J.J. Jonas: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 1179-90.
T. Karthikeyan, S. Saroja and M. Vijayalakshmi: Scripta Mater., 2006, vol. 55, pp. 771-74.
D.H. Warrington and M. Boon: Acta Metall., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 599-607.
G.B. Olson and W.S. Owens, eds.: Martensite, ASM, New York, 1992.
S. Saroja, P. Parameswaran, M. Vijayalakshmi and V.S. Raghunathan: Acta Metall. Mater., 1995, vol. 43 no. 8, pp. 2985-3000.
G.E. Lloyd: J. Struct. Geol., 2000, vol. 22, pp. 1675-93.
L. Ryde : Mater. Sci. Technol., 2006, vol. 22, pp. 1297-306.
A.A. Gazder, M. Sánchez-Araiza, J.J. Jonas, E.V. Pereloma: Acta Mater., 2011, vol. 59, pp. 4847-65.
T. Karthikeyan, M.K. Dash, S. Saroja, and M. Vijayalakshmi: J. Microscopy, 2013, vol. 249 (1), pp. 26-35.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr. S.C. Chetal, Director, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR), and Dr. T. Jayakumar, Director-Metallurgy and Materials Group, IGCAR, India for their sustained support and encouragement during this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted March 27, 2012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karthikeyan, T., Dash, M.K., Saroja, S. et al. Evaluation of Interface Boundaries in 9Cr-1Mo Steel After Thermal and Thermomechanical Treatments. Metall Mater Trans A 44, 1673–1685 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1549-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1549-y