Skip to main content
Log in

Tourist preferences for agricultural landscapes: a case study of terraced paddy fields in Noto Peninsula, Japan

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many agricultural landscapes have been formed through the interaction and co-evolution of nature and people, and represent the living landscapes shaped over time through intensive and continuous human cultivation. Terraced paddy fields are being re-evaluated to take into account the multiple functions they fill beyond only rice cultivation, particularly their contribution to the national biodiversity strategy of Japan. Since the 1990s, terraced paddy fields have been considered a representative cultural landscape of Japan and, at the same time, multi-stakeholder conservation activities have been conducted throughout Japan to reverse the increasing abandonment of terraces. Shiroyone Senmaida is an outstanding cultural landscape and a major tourist attraction in Noto Peninsula, Ishikawa Prefecture, which was designated through an initiative by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) pilot site in 2011. It is important to clarify tourist preference for terraced paddy field landscapes to contribute to future policy making toward improved agricultural landscape conservation. A key finding of this study is that tourists visiting to enjoy the agricultural landscape are also concerned on the sustainability of the farming methods and preferred to maintain the naturalness of the landscape. Respondents with higher educational levels and greater concern for the biological and traditional farming knowledge aspects of the rice terraces were also more inclined to favor sustainable farming practices. Tourists preferred to maintain the naturalness and rurality of the agricultural landscape, and indicated that construction of excessive tourist facilities would cause the landscape to deteriorate. It was suggested that the local community and surroundings, including rural settlements, hills, and forests, should also be conserved together with the scenic terrace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aida A (2011) The history of the conservation movement for cultural landscapes in Sakaori Tanada, Ena, Gifu, Landscape Research 74(5): 409–414. (In Japanese)

  • Altieri MA, Koohafkan P (2004) Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): extent, significance, and implications for development. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting for the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaza M, Gomez-Limon Z, Kallas Z, et al. (2008) Demand for non-commodity outputs from mountain olive groves. Agricultural Economics Review 9: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (2006) Variations on the rural idyll. In: Marsden, T., Mooney, P.H., Cloke, P.J. (Eds.) Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London, UK. pp 149–160.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brush R, Chenoweth RE, Barman T (2000) Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 47: 39–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00073-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cánoves G, Villarino M, Priestley GK, et al. (2004) Rural Tourism in Spain: an analysis of recent evolution. Geoforum 35 (6): 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Concu N, Atzeni G (2012) Conflicting preferences among tourists and residents. Tourism Management 33: 1293–1300. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drábková A (2012) Tourists in Protected Landscape Areas in the Czech Republic-a sociological survey. Procedia Environmental Sciences 14: 279–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv. 2012.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebuchi Y, Ohe Y, Kurihara S (2003) Evaluating Terrace Paddy Preservation Program: a case of Shiroyone-senmaida in Ishikawa Prefecture. The Technical Bulletin of Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University 57: 79–87. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer A, Tsur Y (2000) Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricutlural Economics 27: 385–398. DOI: 10.1093/erae/27.3.385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyhri A, Jocobsen JKS, Tommervik H (2009) Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape and Urban Planning 91: 202–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring K (2006) Landscape Needs and Notions: Preferences, Expectations, Leisure Motivation, and the Concept of Landscape from a Cross-cultural Perspective. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godde PM, Price MF, Zimmermann FM (eds.) (2000) Tourism and development in mountain regions. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohda M (2001) Terrace paddy field conservation system and “Direct Payment for Hilly and Mountainous Areas” in: Goda M (Ed.) Direct Payment for Hilly and Mountainous Areas and Environmental Conservation. Ie-no-higari Association, Tokyo, Japan. pp 43–50. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Limon J, Fernandez JVL (1999) Changes in use and landscape preferences on the agricultural-livestock landscapes of the central Iberian Peninsula (Madrid, Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning 44: 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammatikopoulou I, Pouta E, Salmiovirta M, et al. (2012) Heterogeneous preferences for agricultural landscape improvements in southern Finland, Landscape and Urban Planning 107(2): 181–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.001

  • Hietala-Koivu, R (1999) Agricultural landscapes: a case study in Ylane, south-west Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 46: 163–217. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00051-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howley P, Donoghue CO, Hynes S (2012) Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (1): 66–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howley, P. (2011) Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general public’s’ preferences towards rural landscapes, Ecological Economics 72: 161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026

  • Iiyama N, Kamada M, Nakagoshi N (2005) Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 70(3-4): 301–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa Prefecture, Communication Policy Section (2012) Tourism Analysis Using Statistics. Available online at: http://toukei.pref.ishikawa.jp/search/detail.asp?d_id=2528 (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen A (2011) Beyong the view: future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning 100: 353–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T (2002) Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katayama N, Baba YG, Kusumoto Y, et al. (2015) A review of post-war changes in rice farming and biodiversity in Japan. Agricultural Systems 132: 73–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley G (2000) Balancing tourism and wilderness qualities in New Zealand’s Native Forests. In: Font X, Tribe J (Eds.), Forest Tourism and Recreation: Case Studies in Environmental Management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. pp 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieninger P, Yamaji E, Penker M (2011) Urban people as paddy farmers: the Japanese Tanada Ownership System discussed from a European perspective. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26(4): 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi A (2010) Regarding terraced paddy fields, regarding aenokoto: From Shiroyone Senmada in Wajima, Ishikawa Prefecture, in: (Research Institute of Cultural Properties in Nara): Report of Cultural Landscape Forum (II)-Cultural Landscape as a Living System: How can we read a changing system? pp 106–118. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline J, Wichelns D (1996) Measuring public preferences for the environmental amenities provided by farmland. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23: 123–139. DOI: 10.1093/erae/23.4.421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupidura A, Luczewski M, Home R, et al. (2014) Public perceptions of rural landscapes in land consolidation procedures in Poland. Land Use Policy 39: 313–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurita H, Matsumori K, Yamamoto T (2009) A study on local and non-local residents recognition and evaluation structures of terraced rice fields landscape. Journal of Rural Planning Association 27: 257–261. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MC, Xiong Y, Yuan Z, et al. (2014) Standards of ecological compensation for traditional eco-agriculture: taking rice-fish system in Hani Terrace as an example. Journal of Mountain Science 11(4): 1049–105. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2738-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal D (1982) Revisiting valued landscapes. In: Gold JR, Burgess D (Eds.), Valued Environments. Allen & Unwin, London, UK. pp 74–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda M, Nishimura I (2001) The effects to understanding of life and environment and the tasks of interaction activity-a study on regional interaction at maintenance enterprise of rice terraces in rural hilly area (Part 2)-. Journal of Japan Society of Home Economics 52(5): 439–449. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne S, Ateljevic I (2001) Tourism, economic development and the global local nexus: theory embracing complexity. Tourism Geographies 3(4): 369–393. DOI: 10.1080/146166800110070478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muranaka A (2002) Evaluating the economic benefits of a terraced rice paddy landscape using the contingent valuation method: A case study of Yusuhara Town, Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Geographical Review of Japan 75(4): 195–210 (In Japanese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M (1999) Terraced Rice Paddy in Japan: The Initiative of Conservation. Kokon Shoin, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Natori Y, Chenoweth R (2008) Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 250–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei K, Miyake Y, Matsumoto Y (1999) The actual conditions of conservative activities on rice terraces in mountainous areas. Journal of Rural Planning Association 1: 79–84. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neto F (2003) A new approach to sustainable tourism development: moving beyond environmental protection. Natural Resources Forum 27(3): 212–212. DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.00056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noma H (2008) Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras and Some Issues on Heritage Tourism: Cultural Landscape as World Cultural Heritage and Ifugao Communities. Bulletin of the Institute of Oriental and Occidental Studies, Kansai University 41: 103–136. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara Y (2013) Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan. Ecological engineering 56: 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2001) Multifunctionality: A Framework for Policy Analysis. Paris: OECD. p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omotedani A, Murakami S (2006) A study on the Spatial Conditions for Viewing the Terraced Paddy Fields. Reports of the City Planning Institute of Japan 4: 91–94. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Corliano ME, et al. (2007) Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 29–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Z, Chen B, Takemoto K (2014) Conservation of terraced paddy fields engaged with multiple stakeholders: the case of the Noto GIAHS site in Japan. Paddy and Water Environment 12: 275–283. DOI: 10.1007/s10333-013-0387-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruto E and Garrod G (2009) Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 631–647. DOI: 10.1080/09640560902958172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayadi S, Gonzalez MCR, Requena JC (2009) Public preferences for landscape features: The case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy 26: 334–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y (2008) The visual characteristic of rice terrace landscapes in North Awaji District. Landscape Research Japan 71(5): 701–704. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soini K, Aakkula J (2007) Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: The essence of local conceptions and constructions. Land Use Policy 24(2): 311–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire SJ (1994) Accounting for cultural meanings: the interface between geography and tourism studies reexamined. Progress in Human Geography 18: 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/030913259401800101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Dela Cruz MJ, Min Q, et al. (2013) Conserving agricultural Heritage Systems through tourism: exploration of two mountainous communities in China. Journal of Mountain Science 10(6): 962–975. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2632-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y (2002) Activities of Biodiversity Conservation on Semi-natural Grassland in Japan-Introduction for the Special feature-. Grassland Science 48(3): 264–267. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeshita S, Hirose M, Ohmura Y (2008) Development of teaching material for the fieldwork at the terrace paddy field. Hiroshima Journal of School Education 14: 183–188. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura Z (2003) Miracle of Terraced Paddy Fields. OM Press, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada K, Yoshida K (2005) Analyzing factors of sustainability in Rice-terrace partnership program. Journal of Rural Planning Association 7: 211–216. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaji E (2006) Enjoyment of Rural Amenities by Ownership Program of Rice Terraces. Journal of Rural Planning Association 25(3): 206–212. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Masuda N, Shimomura Y, et al. (1998) Study on the environmental conservation function of paddy field through the case study in Nose-Cho, Osaka Prefecture. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 61(5): 589–592. (In Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida K (1999) CVM, in: Demura K and Yoshida K (Eds.), Valuing Rural Amenities: Methodological Issues and Applications. Tokyo Taimeido Publishing, pp 36–69. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bixia Chen.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-1475

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-777X

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8047-9802

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, B., Qiu, Z. & Nakamura, K. Tourist preferences for agricultural landscapes: a case study of terraced paddy fields in Noto Peninsula, Japan. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 1880–1892 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3564-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3564-0

Keywords

Navigation