Skip to main content
Log in

Examining Faculty Awards for Gender Equity and Evolving Values

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Awards given to medical school faculty are one important mechanism for recognizing what is valued in academic medicine. There have been concerns expressed about the gender distribution of awards, and there is also a growing appreciation for the evolving accomplishments and talents that define academic excellence in the 21st century and that should be considered worthy of award recognition.

OBJECTIVE

Examine faculty awards at our institution for gender equity and evolving values.

METHODS

Recipient data were collected on awards from 1996 to 2007 inclusively at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (SOM). Descriptions of each award also were collected. The female-to-male ratio of award recipients over the time span was reviewed for changes and trends. The title and text of each award announcement were reviewed to determine if the award represented a traditional or a newer concept of excellence in academic medicine.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 21 annual awards given to a total of 59 clinical award recipients, 60 research award recipients, and 154 teaching award recipients. Women received 28% of research awards, 29% of teaching awards and 10% of clinical awards. Gender distribution of total awards was similar to that of SOM full-time faculty except in the clinical awards category. Only one award reflected a shift in the culture of individual achievement to one of collaboration and team performance.

CONCLUSION

Examining both the recipients and content of awards is important to assure they reflect the current composition of diverse faculty and the evolving ideals of leadership and excellence in academic medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.

  2. Handelsman J, Grymes RA. Looking for a few good women? (Editorial). DNA and Cell Biology. 2008;27:463–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carnes M, Bland C. Viewpoint: A challenge to academic health centers and the national institutes of health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad Med. 2007;82:202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mervis J, National Institutes of Health. Male sweep of new award raises questions of bias. Science. 2004;306(5696):595.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dolphin AC. Gender: missing the prizes that can inspire a career. Nature. 2006;442(7105):868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singer M. Beyond bias and barriers. Science. 2006;314(5801):893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.

  8. Kuhn GJ, Abbuhl SB, Clem KJ. Recommendations from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Taskforce on Women in Academic Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):762–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirch DG. Culture and the courage to change. AAMC 2007 Annual Meeting: President's Address: American Association of Medical Colleges; 2007. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/pressrel/2007/2007presidentsaddress.pdf. Accessed 7/21, 2009.

  10. Souba WW. The New Leader: New demands in a changing, turbulent environment. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll JS, Quijada MA. Redirecting traditional professional values to support safety:changing organizational culture in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(suppl II):ii16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zerhouni E. The NIH Roadmap. Science. 2003;302:63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. AAMC Faculty Vitae for the table of traditional vs emerging words by Kirch, GJ. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/members/facultydev/facultyvitae/summer08/feature.htm. Accessed 7/21, 2009.

  15. FOCUS. FOCUS Benchmarks: Gender Statistics. Available at: http://www.med.upenn.edu/focus/Benchmarks.shtml. Accessed 7/21, 2009.

  16. Eagly AHK, Steven J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109:573–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ridgeway CL. Gender, status and leadership. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:637–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heilman M. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:657–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL. Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:474–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Christmas C, Kravet SJ, Durso SC, Wright SM. Clinical Excellence in Academia: Perspectives From Masterful Academic Clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levinson W, Rubenstein A. Mission critical—integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):840–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Hampton CL. Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: results of a survey. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2625–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lucey CR. Promotion for Clinician-educators; Time for a fresh approach? (editorial). J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):768–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson B, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Acad Med. 2002;77:1043–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gjerberg E, Kjolsrod L. The doctor-nurse relationship: how easy is it to be a female doctor cooperating with a female nurse? Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:189–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeman R, Weinstein E, Marincola E, Rosenbaum J, Solomon F. Competition and careers in biosciences. Science. 2001;294:2293–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Academic Physician & Scientist. An interview with Darryl Kirch, president and CEO of the AAMC. Academic Physician and Scientist, 2008.

  29. Carr PL, Bickel J, Inui T, eds. A Resource Guide for Medical Faculty. Boston University School of Medicine; 2003.

  30. Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science-time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1621–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

SA, PS, LWT, and AC are partially supported by FOCUS on Health & Leadership for Women, a program at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine designed to improve the recruitment, retention, advancement and leadership of women faculty and to promote women’s health research.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema S. Sonnad PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbuhl, S., Bristol, M.N., Ashfaq, H. et al. Examining Faculty Awards for Gender Equity and Evolving Values. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 57–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1092-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1092-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation