ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Awards given to medical school faculty are one important mechanism for recognizing what is valued in academic medicine. There have been concerns expressed about the gender distribution of awards, and there is also a growing appreciation for the evolving accomplishments and talents that define academic excellence in the 21st century and that should be considered worthy of award recognition.
OBJECTIVE
Examine faculty awards at our institution for gender equity and evolving values.
METHODS
Recipient data were collected on awards from 1996 to 2007 inclusively at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (SOM). Descriptions of each award also were collected. The female-to-male ratio of award recipients over the time span was reviewed for changes and trends. The title and text of each award announcement were reviewed to determine if the award represented a traditional or a newer concept of excellence in academic medicine.
MAIN RESULTS
There were 21 annual awards given to a total of 59 clinical award recipients, 60 research award recipients, and 154 teaching award recipients. Women received 28% of research awards, 29% of teaching awards and 10% of clinical awards. Gender distribution of total awards was similar to that of SOM full-time faculty except in the clinical awards category. Only one award reflected a shift in the culture of individual achievement to one of collaboration and team performance.
CONCLUSION
Examining both the recipients and content of awards is important to assure they reflect the current composition of diverse faculty and the evolving ideals of leadership and excellence in academic medicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
Handelsman J, Grymes RA. Looking for a few good women? (Editorial). DNA and Cell Biology. 2008;27:463–5.
Carnes M, Bland C. Viewpoint: A challenge to academic health centers and the national institutes of health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad Med. 2007;82:202–6.
Mervis J, National Institutes of Health. Male sweep of new award raises questions of bias. Science. 2004;306(5696):595.
Dolphin AC. Gender: missing the prizes that can inspire a career. Nature. 2006;442(7105):868.
Singer M. Beyond bias and barriers. Science. 2006;314(5801):893.
Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
Kuhn GJ, Abbuhl SB, Clem KJ. Recommendations from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Taskforce on Women in Academic Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):762–7.
Kirch DG. Culture and the courage to change. AAMC 2007 Annual Meeting: President's Address: American Association of Medical Colleges; 2007. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/pressrel/2007/2007presidentsaddress.pdf. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
Souba WW. The New Leader: New demands in a changing, turbulent environment. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:79–87.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:25.
Carroll JS, Quijada MA. Redirecting traditional professional values to support safety:changing organizational culture in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(suppl II):ii16–21.
Zerhouni E. The NIH Roadmap. Science. 2003;302:63–72.
AAMC Faculty Vitae for the table of traditional vs emerging words by Kirch, GJ. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/members/facultydev/facultyvitae/summer08/feature.htm. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
FOCUS. FOCUS Benchmarks: Gender Statistics. Available at: http://www.med.upenn.edu/focus/Benchmarks.shtml. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
Eagly AHK, Steven J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109:573–98.
Ridgeway CL. Gender, status and leadership. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:637–55.
Heilman M. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:657–74.
Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL. Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:474–80.
Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):711–6.
Christmas C, Kravet SJ, Durso SC, Wright SM. Clinical Excellence in Academia: Perspectives From Masterful Academic Clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:989–94.
Levinson W, Rubenstein A. Mission critical—integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):840–3.
Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Hampton CL. Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: results of a survey. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2625–9.
Lucey CR. Promotion for Clinician-educators; Time for a fresh approach? (editorial). J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):768–9.
Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson B, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Acad Med. 2002;77:1043–61.
Gjerberg E, Kjolsrod L. The doctor-nurse relationship: how easy is it to be a female doctor cooperating with a female nurse? Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:189–202.
Freeman R, Weinstein E, Marincola E, Rosenbaum J, Solomon F. Competition and careers in biosciences. Science. 2001;294:2293–4.
Academic Physician & Scientist. An interview with Darryl Kirch, president and CEO of the AAMC. Academic Physician and Scientist, 2008.
Carr PL, Bickel J, Inui T, eds. A Resource Guide for Medical Faculty. Boston University School of Medicine; 2003.
Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science-time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1621–3.
Acknowledgments
SA, PS, LWT, and AC are partially supported by FOCUS on Health & Leadership for Women, a program at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine designed to improve the recruitment, retention, advancement and leadership of women faculty and to promote women’s health research.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbuhl, S., Bristol, M.N., Ashfaq, H. et al. Examining Faculty Awards for Gender Equity and Evolving Values. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 57–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1092-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1092-8