Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the change in biomechanical milieu following removal of pedicle screws in instrumented single level lumbar arthrodesis. Using a validated finite element (FE) model of the intact lumbar spine (L2–5), two scenarios of L3–4 lumbar fusion were simulated: posterolateral fusion (PLF) at L3–4 using pedicle screws (PLF with pedicle screws; WiP) and L3–4 lumbar posterolateral fusion state after removal of pedicle screws (PLF without pedicle screws; WoP). The WiP model had greater range of motion (ROM) at each adjacent segment than the WoP model. This phenomenon became pronounced at the proximal adjacent segment under flexion moment. Similarly, removal of pedicle screws (the WoP model) relieved the maximal von Mises stress at adjacent segments under 4 moments compared to the WiP model. This study demonstrated that removal of pedicle screws could decrease stiffness of fusion segments, which would reduce the disk stress of adjacent segments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bono CM, Lee CK (2004) Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 29:455–463
Bono CM, Khandha A et al (2007) Residual sagittal motion after lumbar fusion: a finite element analysis with implications on radiographic flexion-extension criteria. Spine 32:417–422
Chen CS, Cheng CK et al (2001) Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 23:483–491
David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32:661–666
Deckey JE, Court C et al (2000) Loss of sagittal plane correction after removal of spinal implants. Spine 25:2453–2460
Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90:163–169
Fischgrund JS, Mackay M et al (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22:2807–2812
Goel VK, Kim YE et al (1988) An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation. Spine 13:1003–1011
Guan Y, Yoganandan N et al (2006) Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:633–641
Ha K, Lee J et al (2009) Bone graft volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study with a five-year follow-up. Spine 34:1663–1668
Harrop JS, Youssef JA et al (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33:1701–1707
Jackson RK, Boston DA et al (1985) Lateral mass fusion. A prospective study of a consecutive series with long-term follow-up. Spine 10:828–832
Kim Y (2007) Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation. Spine 32:2558–2568
Kim HJ, Moon SH et al (2009) Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4–5 segment. Clin Invest Med 32:E64–E69
Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS et al (2004) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 29:726–733
Kumar MN, Baklanov A et al (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319
Lai P, Chen L et al (2004) Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine 29:2527–2532
Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377
Ma HT, Griffith JF et al (2009) Kinematics of the lumbar spine in elderly subjects with decreased bone mineral density. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:783–789
Park P, Garton HJ et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944
Penta M, Sandhu A et al (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 20:743–747
Pintar FA, Yoganandan N et al (1992) Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. J Biomech 25:1351–1356
Potter BK, Kirk KL et al (2006) Loss of coronal correction following instrumentation removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:67–72
Rahm MD, Hall BB (1996) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9:392–400
Shirazi-Adl SA, Shrivastava SC et al (1984) Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine 9:120–134
Shono Y, Kaneda K et al (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 23:1550–1558
Wagner DR, Lotz JC (2004) Theoretical model and experimental results for the nonlinear elastic behavior of human annulus fibrosus. J Orthop Res 22:901–909
Wai EK, Santos ER et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 31:1952–1956
Wu HC, Yao RF (1976) Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus. J Biomech 9:1–7
Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM et al (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14:1256–1260
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grant No. R01-2006-000-10933-0 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science & Engineering Foundation, the Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science at Yonsei University, and AOSPINE research fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
H.-J. Kim and H.-J. Chun contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, HJ., Chun, HJ., Moon, SH. et al. Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 703–709 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0621-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0621-2