Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive Mechanical Response of Porcine Muscle at Intermediate (100/s-102/s) Strain Rates

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compressive stress-strain response of porcine muscle was experimentally determined at intermediate strain rates (100/s-102/s) in this study. A hydraulically driven materials testing system with a dynamic testing mode was used to perform the compressive experiments on porcine muscle tissue with loading directions parallel and perpendicular to muscle fiber direction. Experiments at quasi-static strain rates were also conducted to investigate the strain-rate effects over a wider range. The experimental results show that, at intermediate strain rates, the porcine muscle’s compressive stress-strain responses are non-linear and strain-rate sensitive. The porcine muscle’s compressive mechanical response exhibits no significant difference between the two fiber orientation cases at quasi-static and intermediate strain rates. An Ogden model with two material constants was adopted to describe the rate-dependent compressive behavior of the porcine muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamada H (1970) Strength of Biological Materials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fung Y (1993) Biomechanics. Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosboom E, Hesselink M, Oomens C, Bouten C, Drost M, Baaijens F (2001) Passive transverse mechanical properties of skeletal muscle under in vivo compression. J Biomech 34:1365–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto J, Fung Y (1973) Mechanical properties of the heart muscle in the passive state. J Biomech 6:597–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins D, Bey M (1997) Muscle and tendon force-length properties and their interactions in vivo. Journal of Biomehcanics 30:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Loocke M, Lyons C, Simms C (2006) A validated model of passive muscle in compression. J Biomech 39:2999–3009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Loocke M, Simms C, Lyons C (2009) Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression-cyclic behaviour. J Biomech 42:1038–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Loocke M, Lyons C, Simms C (2008) Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: Stress-relaxation behaviour and constitutive modelling. J Biomech 41:1555–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takaza M, Moerman K, Gindre J, Lyons G, Simms C (2013) The anisotropic mechanical behaviour of passive skeletal muscle tissue subjected to large tensile strain. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 17:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrow D, Haut Donahue T, Odegard G, Kaufman K (2010) Transversely isotropic tensile material properties of skeletal muscle tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gennisson J, Deffieux T, Macé E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M (2010) Viscoelastic and Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of in vivo Muscle Tissue Assessed by Supersonic Shear Imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:789–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borg T, Caulfield J (1980) Morphology of connective tissue in skeletal muscle. Tissue Cell 12:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillies A, Lieber R (2011) Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle Nerve 44:318–331

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trotter J, Purslow P (1992) Functional morphology of the endomysium in series fibered muscles. J Morphol 212:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schleip R, Naylor I, Ursu D, Melzer W, Zorn A, Wilke H, Lehmann-Horn F, Klingler W (2006) Passive muscle stiffness may be influenced by active contractility of intramuscular connective tissue. Med Hypotheses 66:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer G, Lieber R (2011) Elucidation of extracellular matrix mechanics from muscle fibers and fiber bundles. J Biomech 44:771–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song B, Chen W, Ge Y, Weeresooriya T (2007) Dynamic and quasi-static compressive response of porcine muscle. J Biomech 40:2999–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sligtenhorst C, Cronin D, Brodland G (2006) High strain rate compressive properties of bovine muscle tissue determined using a split Hopkinson bar apparatus. J Biomech 39:1852–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nie X, Cheng J, Chen W, Weerasooriya T (2010) Dynamic tensile response of porcine muscle. J Appl Mech 78(021009):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Song B, Syn C, Grupido C, Chen W, Lu W (2008) A long split Hopkinson pressure bar (LSHPB) for intermediate-rate characterization of soft materials. Exp Mech 48:809–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen W (2016) Experimental methods for characterizing dynamic response of soft materials. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials 2:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarva S, Deschanel S, Boyce M, Chen W (2007) Stress-strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer 48:2208–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deschanel S, Greviskes B, Bertoldi K, Sarva S, Chen W, Samuels S, Cohen R, Boyce M (2009) Rate dependent finite deformation stress-strain behavior of an ethylene methacrylic acid copolymer and an ethylene methacrylic acid butyl acrylate copolymer. Polymer 50:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shim J, Mohr D (2009) Using split Hopkinson pressure bars to perform large strain compression tests on polyurea at low. intermediate and high strain rates International Journal of Impact Engineering 36:1116–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Myers B, Woolley C, Slotter T, Garrett W, Best T (1998) The influence of strain rate on the passive and stimulated engineering stress-large strain behavior of the rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech Eng 120:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ottenio M, Tran D, Ní Annaidh A, Gilchrist M, Bruyère K (2015) Strain rate and anisotropy effects on the tensile failure characteristics of human skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. López J, Allen P, Alamo L, Jones D, Sreter F (1988) Myoplasmic free [Ca2+] during a malignant hyperthermia episode in swine. Muscle Nerve 11:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen W, Song B (2011) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar design, testing and applications. Springer US, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Gindre J, Takaza M, Moerman K, Simms C (2013) A structural model of passive skeletal muscle shows two reinforcement processes in resisting deformation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 22:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogden R (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity: on the correlation of theory and experiment for compressible rubberlike solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical. Phys Eng Sci 328:567–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank PEO Soldiers and Army Research Laboratory for supporting this work through a collaborative research agreement with Purdue University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Zhai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, X., Chen, W.W. Compressive Mechanical Response of Porcine Muscle at Intermediate (100/s-102/s) Strain Rates. Exp Mech 59, 1299–1305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00456-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00456-1

Keywords

Navigation