Abstract
We suggest a model that describes how counterfactuals are constructed and justified. The model can describe how counterfactual beliefs are updated given the unfolding of actual history. It also allows us to examine the use of counterfactuals in prediction, and to show that a logically omniscient reasoner gains nothing from using counterfactuals for prediction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aumann R. J. (1995) Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 6–19
Battigalli P., Marciano S. (1999) Hierarchies of conditional beliefs and interactive epistemology in dynamic games. Journal of Economic Theory 88: 188–230
Bunzl M. (2004) Counterfactual History: A User’s Guide. The American Historical Review 109: 845–858
Gentzen, G. (1934–1935). Untersuchungen Uber das logische Schliessen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39, 405–431
Gilboa, I., Samuelson, L., & Schmeidler, D. (2010). Dynamics of induction in a unified model. Mimeo.
Hume D. (1748) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Medvec V., Madey S., Gilovich T. (1995) When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 603–610
Samet D. (1996) Hypothetical knowledge and games with perfect information. Games and Economic Behavior 17: 230–251
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundation of Statistics (New York: Wiley; Second edition 1972, Dover).
Stalnaker R. (1968) A theory of counterfactuals. In: Rescher N. (eds) Studies in logical theory. American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph 2. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 98–112
Stalnaker R. (1996) Knowledge, belief and counterfactual reasoning in games. Economics and Philosophy 12: 133–163
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Tillio, A., Gilboa, I. & Samuelson, L. The predictive role of counterfactuals. Theory Decis 74, 167–182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9263-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9263-6