Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reviews the sustainable urban design concept and identifies critical factors for enhancing social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Through a questionnaire survey carried out in Hong Kong, the opinions of architects, planners, property development managers, and local citizens were sought and evaluated. The results derived from factor analysis indicated that certain design features should be incorporated for achieving social sustainability. “Satisfaction of Welfare Requirements”, “Conservation of Resources & the Surroundings”, “Creation of Harmonious Living Environment”, “Provisions Facilitating Daily Life Operations”, “Form of Development” and “Availability of Open Spaces” were believed to be the significant underlying factors for enhancing social sustainability of local urban renewal projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hong Kong Institute of Architects (HKIA), Hong Kong Institute of Planners (HKIP), Real Estate Developers Association of Hong Kong (REDA).

  2. Yau Tsim Mong, Sham Shui Po, Wan Chai, and Central & Western districts are selected for this questionnaire survey.

References

  • Adams, D., & Hastings, E. M. (2001). Urban renewal in Hong Kong: Transition from development corporation to renewal authority. Land Use Policy, 18(3), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P., & Manta Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che Musa, C. O. (2000). Urbanization versus urban planning practice in Malaysia: Considerations, prospects and possibilities. In A. G. O. Yeh & M. K. Ng (Eds.), Planning for a better urban living environment in Asia (pp. 54–68). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan E.H., & Yung E. H. K. (2004). Is the development control legal framework conducive to a sustainable dense urban development in Hong Kong? Habitat International, 28, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: The experience of Hong Kong. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (pp. 221–239). USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE), and Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2001). The value of urban design: A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. London: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J., & Corbett, M. (2000). Designing sustainable communities: Learning from village homes. Canada: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. London: Macmillan Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C., & Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain. The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership. Cities, 17(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). Report on the urban living space pilot area forum. In Sustainable development: Making choices for our future—Pilot area forum (Council for Sustainable Development, Hong Kong), 11 September (2004).

  • Cuthbert, A. R., & Dimitriou, H. T. (1992). Redeveloping the fifth quarter—A case study of redevelopment in Hong Kong. Cities, 9(3), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (2000). By design: urban design in the planning system: Towards better practice. London: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enyedi, G. (2002). Social sustainability of large cities. Ekistics, 69 (412–414), 142–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. Y. S. (2004). Sustainable development and the conservation of natural and cultural heritage. In T. Mottershead, (Ed.), Sustainable development in Hong Kong (pp. 387–420). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grange, A. L. (2004). Sustainable development and housing. In T. Mottershead (Ed.), Sustainable development in Hong Kong (pp. 323–352). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Planning and Lands Bureau (2001). Urban renewal strategy. Hong Kong: Housing Planning and Lands Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai K. T. (2002). Long Walk to Sustainability. South China Morning Post, 13 September (2002).

  • Lee, J. S. (2003). Enhancing sustainability in downtown by triple-value adding to urban redevelopment efforts: A case study of Seoul, Korea. Unpublished Thesis. University of Washington.

  • Li, M. M., & Brown, H. J. (1980). Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics, 56(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K. (2002). Property-led urban renewal in Hong Kong: Any place for the community? Sustainable Development, 10(3), 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K., Cook, A., & Chui, E. W. T. (2001). The road not travelled: A sustainable urban regeneration strategy for Hong Kong. Planning Practice and Research, 16(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oktay, D. (2004), Urban design for sustainability: A study on the Turkish City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11(1), pp. 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omann, I., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Assessing social sustainability: The social dimension of sustainability in a socio-economic scenario. In 7th biennial conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics in Sousse (Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Tunisia), 6–9 March 2002.

  • Planning Department. (2002a). Hong Kong 2030: Planning vision and strategy. Retrieved October 23rd, (2004), from http://www.info.gov.hk/planning/index_e.htm.

  • Planning Department (2002b). Urban design guidelines for Hong Kong: Executive summary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, 10(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, J. (1969). Economic evaluation of urban renewal: Conceptual foundation of benefit-cost analysis. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, P. (1995). The concept of sustainable development. discussion paper. Switzerland: Green Cross International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearlock C., James P., & Phillips, J. (2000). Regional sustainable development: Are the new regional development agencies armed with the information they require? Sustainable Development, 8(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (2000). Sustainability and urban design. In W. S. Wong & E. H. W. Chan (Eds.), Building Hong Kong: Environmental considerations (pp. 17–42). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Employment, social justice, and societal well-being. In ILO Global employment forum 1–3 (Labour Organization, Ghent), November (2001).

  • Urban Renewal Authority: (2003), Urban renewal authority Annual Report 2002–2003 (Urban Renewal Authority, Hong Kong).

  • Vandell, K. D., Lane, J. S., & Kain, J. F. (1989). The Economics of architecture and urban design: Some preliminary findings. AREUE Journal, 17(2), 235–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment, Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by research grant provided by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Hong Kong

    Edwin Chan & Grace K. L. Lee

Authors
  1. Edwin Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grace K. L. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace K. L. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, E., Lee, G.K.L. Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Soc Indic Res 85, 243–256 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9089-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9089-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation