Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in Chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper looks at the patterns of collaborative scientific output during the first 10 years of the New Millennium (2000–2009) based on Web of Science data for those Mexican institutions and departments known to be researching in Chemistry. Of the 17,109 papers retrieved 76.9 % were in collaboration, with 34.3 % of these involving foreign institutions. We analysed the collaboration links with foreign partners using visualizations and their dynamics by determining the combination and frequency of individual occurrences and by establishing the sequence found in our country co-authorship chains. Bilateral partnerships were the most common predominantly with the USA and to the lesser extent with Spain. These two countries are also the protagonists of the most frequent trilateral co-authorships. Collaboration with other Latin American countries is infrequent and mainly bilateral. The number of partner countries increased from 75 to 92 from the first to the second quinquennium. With respect to the countries emerging in the second period we find a greater occurrence and repetition of bilateral partnerships and a notable presence of Mexico’s main industrialised partners in the corresponding chains. Similar numbers of journals were found for national and international collaborative papers with important differences but several coincidences. The subject range of journals was diverse in both cases, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field but with an important presence of titles specializing in subfields of Chemistry. Our findings provide new insight into the way countries interact and communicate when co-authoring with developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5–6), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, R., Zayago Lau, E., Foladori, G., Parker, R., Villa Vazquez, L. L., Robles Belmont, E., et al. (2016). Inventory of nanotechnology companies in Mexico. Journal of Nanoparticle Research,. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3344-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2014). The moderating roles of academic age and institutional sector on the relationship between co-authorship network centrality and academic research performance. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaban, A. T., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Is chemistry “The Central Science”? How are different sciences related? Co-citations, reductionism, emergence, and posets. Scientometrics, 60(3), 615–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J., & Juanico, A. (2011). Current status of nanotechnology in Mexico. NEHIPISIC’11 Proceeding of 10th WSEAS international conference on electronics, hardware, wireless and optical communications, and 10th WSEAS international conference on signal processing, robotics and automation, and 3rd WSEAS international conference on nanotechnology, and 2nd WSEAS international conference on plasma-fusion-nuclear physics. (pp. 54–60). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2011/Cambridge/NEHIPISIC/NEHIPISIC-07.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2016.

  • Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2004). Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view. Serials, 17(2), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracho-Riquelme, R. L., Pescador-Salas, N., & Reyes-Romero, M. A. (1999). The change from French to English and its effect upon the impact factor and ranking of the Pasteur journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(5), 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaños Rodriguez, H. (2014). Inicios y evolución de la ciencia en México. In H. Castaños & E. Muñiz (Eds.), Mitos y realidades de la ciencia en México (pp 10–14). UNAM: México. http://ru.iiec.unam.mx/2655/. Accessed May 28, 2016.

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Benavent-Pérez, M., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012a). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2223–2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Ferligoj, A., Miguel, S., Kronegger, L., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012b). Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: A case study. Scientometrics, 93(3), 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Lamas, G. (2004). Editorial. Revista de la Sociedad Química de México, 48(4), 225–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ramos, G. C. (2014). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Global trends and national implications for policy and regulatory issues. Technology in Society, 37, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foladori, G. (2006). Nanotechnology in Latin America at the crossroads. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 3(2), 205–2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J. (1989). La science du tiers monde est-elle visible? La Recherche, 20(210), 636–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J., Gaillard, A. M., & Arvantis, R. (2013). Determining factors of international collaboration in science & technology: results of a questionnaire survey. In J. Gaillard & R. Arvanitis (Eds.), Research collaboration between Europe and Latin America: Mapping and understandig partnership (pp. 107–156). Paris: Ed. des Archives Contemporaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., & Sebastián, J. (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 44(3), 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Veloso, F., & Perez-Angón, M. A. (2016). The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0151328. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M. (1997). Collaboration profile of theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 39(3), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennemann, S., Rybski, D., & Liefner, I. (2012). The myth of global science collaboration—Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-García, Y., Chamizo, J. A., Kleiche-Dray, M., & Russell, J. M. (2015). The scientific impact of Mexican steroids research 1935–1965: A bibliometric and historiographic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,. doi:10.1002/asi.23493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-García, Y., Kleiche-Dray, M., & Russell, J. M. (2013). Enfoques metodológicos para identificar y caracterizar la investigación mexicana en Química en bases de datos bibliográficas. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 27(59), 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh, S. (2014). How far has the international neurology journal progressed since its transformation into an English language journal? International Neurology Journal, 18(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89(3), 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Publication trend on nanotechnology among G15 countries: A bibliometric study. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 5(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013). The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3), 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiche-Dray, M., & Casas-Guerrero, R. (2008). La institucionalización de un campo científico: el caso de la química en México en el siglo XX. Redes, 14(28), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiche-Dray, M., & Chiapa Zenón, A. (2014). Colaboraciones y construcción de redes de los químicos mexicanos’. In M. Kleiche-Dray & D. Villavicencio (Eds.), Cooperación y colaboración científicas y movilidad internacional en América Latina (pp. 161–176). Buenos Aires: Clacso/IRD. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/posgrados/20141028014136/cooperacion.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2016.

  • Kleiche-Dray, M. & Villavicencio, D. (Eds.) (2014). Cooperación y colaboración científicas y movilidad internacional en América Latina (pp. 272). Buenos Aires: Clacso/IRD. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/posgrados/20141028014136/cooperacion.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2016.

  • Kumari, L. (2006). Trends in synthetic organic chemistry research. Cross-country comparison of the activity index. Scientometrics, 67(3), 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1–2), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C., Park, H., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El Profesional de la Información, 2(1), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Vindefjä, N. A., & Sundberg, L. J. (2010). What do European research collaboration networks in life science look like? Research Evaluation, 19(5), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., & Hesselink, F. T. (1996). The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications. Research Policy, 25(5), 819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narváez-Berthelemot, N., Almada de Ascencio, M., & Russell, J. M. (1993). International scientific collaboration: cooperation between Latin America and Spain, as seen from different databases. Journal of Information Science, 19(5), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Frigoletto, L. P., & Miquel, J. F. (1992). International scientific collaboration in Latin America. Scientometrics, 24(3), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, M. J. (2014). Mine, thine, and ours: Collaboration and co-authorship in the material culture of the mid-twentieth century chemical laboratory. Ambix, 61(3), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankratov, A. (2005). Information resources on chemistry and natural sciences in general. Online Information Review, 29(2), 168–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robles-Belmont, E., & Vinck, D. (2011). A panorama of nanoscience developments in Mexico based on the comparison and crossing of nanoscience monitoring methods. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11(6), 5499–5507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas Gutiérrez, A. M., & Escalante Vargas, M. I. (1995). La Producción Científica Mexicana en Revistas Nacionales e lnternacionales a través de las Bases de Datos Periódica y Blat (1981–1985). Tesis de Licenciatura, Colegio de Bibliotecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF.

  • Rosas Poblano, S. G. (2011). El Instituto de Química y su producción científica en el periodo 2000–2009. Biblioteca Universitaria, 14(2), 56–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., Rosas, A. M., & Escalante, M. I. (1994). Comparative study of Mexican research published in the regional and mainstream scientific literature. In 47th FID Conference and Congress. Sonic City Omiya, Saitama, Japan, 5–8 October 1994. International Federation for Information and Documentation, pp. 499–504.

  • Russell, J. M. (1995). The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 34(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., & Ainsworth, S. (2013). Mapping S&T Collaboration between Latin America and Europe: Bibliometric Analysis of Co-authorships (1984–2007). In J. Gaillard & R. Arvantis (Eds.), Research collaborations between Europe and Latin America. Mapping and understanding partnership (pp. 43–46). Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., Madera-Jaramillo, M. J., Hernández-García, Y., & Ainsworth, S. (2008). Mexican collaboration networks in the international and regional arenas. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 29 July–1 August, 2008. http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/RussellWIS2008mcn.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2015.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Meera, (2009). Research collaboration patterns in Indian contributions to chemical sciences. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 3(1), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (1997a). Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800–1995. Scientometrics, 39(1), 107–123.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (1997b). Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances. Scientometrics, 39(1), 125–140.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • StatNano. Mexican Profile. (2016). http://statnano.com/country/mexico. Accessed June 16, 2016.

  • Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. RS Policy Document 03/11 pp.114. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2011/4294976134.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2015.

  • Whitesides, G. M. (2005). Nanoscience, nanotechnology, and chemistry. Small, 1(2), 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out under the cooperation agreement “Sciences, Technology and Society” HISOQUIMEX, between the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, IRD and supported by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, UNAM; the Programa de Doctorado Transdisciplinario, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Cinvestav-IPN; and ANR géoscience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información, UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), 04510, Mexico, DF, Mexico

    Jane M. Russell

  2. Programa de Doctorado Transdisciplinario: Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico para la Sociedad, Cinvestav (Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico, Mexico

    Yoscelina Hernández-García

  3. UMR 196 Ceped, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement IRD and Université Paris V Descartes-USPC, Paris, France

    Mina Kleiche-Dray

Authors
  1. Jane M. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoscelina Hernández-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mina Kleiche-Dray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane M. Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Russell, J.M., Hernández-García, Y. & Kleiche-Dray, M. Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in Chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns. Scientometrics 109, 283–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2069-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2069-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation