Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radionecrosis is a well-characterized effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and is occasionally associated with serious neurologic sequelae. Here, we investigated the incidence of and clinical variables associated with the development of radionecrosis and related radiographic changes after SRS for brain metastases in a cohort of patients with long-term follow up. 271 brain metastases treated with single-fraction linear accelerator-based SRS were analyzed. Radionecrosis was diagnosed either pathologically or radiographically. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the association between radionecrosis and clinical factors available prior to treatment planning. After median follow up of 17.2 months, radionecrosis was observed in 70 (25.8 %) lesions, including 47 (17.3 %) symptomatic cases. 22 of 70 cases (31.4 %) were diagnosed pathologically and 48 (68.6 %) were diagnosed radiographically. The actuarial incidence of radionecrosis was 5.2 % at 6 months, 17.2 % at 12 months and 34.0 % at 24 months. On univariate analysis, radionecrosis was associated with maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.55, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR 2.21, p = 0.004), prescription dose (HR 0.56, p = 0.02) and histology other than non-small cell lung, breast or melanoma (HR 1.85, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, only maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.10, p < 0.001) was associated with radionecrosis risk. This data demonstrates that with close imaging follow-up, radionecrosis after single-fraction SRS for brain metastases is not uncommon. Maximum tumor diameter on pre-treatment MR imaging can provide a reliable estimate of radionecrosis risk prior to treatment planning, with the greatest risk among tumors measuring >1 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann RD, Carrie C, Ben Hassel M, Kouri M, Valeinis E, van den Berge D, Collette S, Collette L, Mueller RP (2011) Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol 29:134–141. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, Nakagawa K, Toyoda T, Hatano K, Kenjyo M, Oya N, Hirota S, Shioura H, Kunieda E, Inomata T, Hayakawa K, Katoh N, Kobashi G (2006) Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 295:2483–2491. doi:10.1001/jama.295.21.2483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Korytko T, Radivoyevitch T, Colussi V, Wessels BW, Pillai K, Maciunas RJ, Einstein DB (2006) 12 Gy gamma knife radiosurgical volume is a predictor for radiation necrosis in non-AVM intracranial tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:419–424. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blonigen BJ, Steinmetz RD, Levin L, Lamba MA, Warnick RE, Breneman JC (2010) Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:996–1001. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minniti G, Clarke E, Lanzetta G, Osti MF, Trasimeni G, Bozzao A, Romano A, Enrici RM (2011) Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 6:48. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-48

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohtakara K, Hayashi S, Nakayama N, Ohe N, Yano H, Iwama T, Hoshi H (2012) Significance of target location relative to the depth from the brain surface and high-dose irradiated volume in the development of brain radionecrosis after micromultileaf collimator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. J Neurooncol 108:201–209. doi:10.1007/s11060-012-0834-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuttrumpf LH, Niyazi M, Nachbichler SB, Manapov F, Jansen N, Siefert A, Belka C (2014) Prognostic factors for survival and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole brain radiation therapy for 1–3 cerebral metastases. Radiat Oncol 9:105. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-9-105

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, Dinapoli R, Kline R, Loeffler J, Farnan N (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:291–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Pollock BE, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD (1997) Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: multivariate analysis and risk modeling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:485–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyawaki L, Dowd C, Wara W, Goldsmith B, Albright N, Gutin P, Halbach V, Hieshima G, Higashida R, Lulu B, Pitts L, Schell M, Smith V, Weaver K, Wilson C, Larson D (1999) Five year results of LINAC radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: outcome for large AVMS. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:1089–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Voges J, Treuer H, Sturm V, Buchner C, Lehrke R, Kocher M, Staar S, Kuchta J, Muller RP (1996) Risk analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:1055–1063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura JL, Verhey LJ, Smith V, Petti PL, Lamborn KR, Larson DA, Wara WM, McDermott MW, Sneed PK (2001) Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:1313–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barker FG 2nd, Butler WE, Lyons S, Cascio E, Ogilvy CS, Loeffler JS, Chapman PH (2003) Dose-volume prediction of radiation-related complications after proton beam radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 99:254–263. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.2.0254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mullins ME, Barest GD, Schaefer PW, Hochberg FH, Gonzalez RG, Lev MH (2005) Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1967–1972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fatterpekar GM, Galheigo D, Narayana A, Johnson G, Knopp E (2012) Treatment-related change versus tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: a diagnostic conundrum–use of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:19–26. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barajas RF, Chang JS, Sneed PK, Segal MR, McDermott MW, Cha S (2009) Distinguishing recurrent intra-axial metastatic tumor from radiation necrosis following gamma knife radiosurgery using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:367–372. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasparetto EL, Pawlak MA, Patel SH, Huse J, Woo JH, Krejza J, Rosenfeld MR, O’Rourke DM, Lustig R, Melhem ER, Wolf RL (2009) Posttreatment recurrence of malignant brain neoplasm: accuracy of relative cerebral blood volume fraction in discriminating low from high malignant histologic volume fraction. Radiology 250:887–896. doi:10.1148/radiol.2502071444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Enslow MS, Zollinger LV, Morton KA, Butterfield RI, Kadrmas DJ, Christian PE, Boucher KM, Heilbrun ME, Jensen RL, Hoffman JM (2012) Comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorothymidine PET in differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent glioma. Clin Nucl Med 37:854–861. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318262c76a

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatzoglou V, Ulaner GA, Zhang Z, Beal K, Holodny AI, Young RJ (2013) Comparison of the effectiveness of MRI perfusion and fluorine-18 FDG PET-CT for differentiating radiation injury from viable brain tumor: a preliminary retrospective analysis with pathologic correlation in all patients. Clin Imaging 37:451–457. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.08.008

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nedzi LA, Kooy H, Alexander E 3rd, Gelman RS, Loeffler JS (1991) Variables associated with the development of complications from radiosurgery of intracranial tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:591–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Varlotto JM, Flickinger JC, Niranjan A, Bhatnagar AK, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2003) Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:452–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Varlotto JM, Flickinger JC, Niranjan A, Bhatnagar A, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2005) The impact of whole-brain radiation therapy on the long-term control and morbidity of patients surviving more than one year after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1125–1132. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kjellberg RN, Hanamura T, Davis KR, Lyons SL, Adams RD (1983) Bragg-peak proton-beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 309:269–274. doi:10.1056/NEJM198308043090503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Epstein AH, Simons SR, Wu A (1992) Radiosurgery and brain tolerance: an analysis of neurodiagnostic imaging changes after gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:19–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrence YR, Li XA, el Naqa I, Hahn CA, Marks LB, Merchant TE, Dicker AP (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S20–S27. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chin LS, Ma L, DiBiase S (2001) Radiation necrosis following gamma knife surgery: a case-controlled comparison of treatment parameters and long-term clinical follow up. J Neurosurg 94:899–904. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.94.6.0899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boothe D, Young R, Yamada Y, Prager A, Chan T, Beal K (2013) Bevacizumab as a treatment for radiation necrosis of brain metastases post stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuro-oncology 15:1257–1263. doi:10.1093/neuonc/not085

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levin VA, Bidaut L, Hou P, Kumar AJ, Wefel JS, Bekele BN, Grewal J, Prabhu S, Loghin M, Gilbert MR, Jackson EF (2011) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1487–1495. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.061

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Belohlavek O, Simonova G, Kantorova I, Novotny J Jr, Liscak R (2003) Brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell gamma knife: can FDG PET help to differentiate radionecrosis from tumour progression? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:96–100. doi:10.1007/s00259-002-1011-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Langleben DD, Segall GM (2000) PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. J Nucl Med 41:1861–1867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; National Institutes of Health. 18F-Fluorocholine (18F-FCho) to Distinguish Necrosis From Recurrence in Brain Metastases. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000—[cited 2014 Oct 26]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02037945. NLM Identifier: NCT02037945

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Beal.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1786 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kohutek, Z.A., Yamada, Y., Chan, T.A. et al. Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. J Neurooncol 125, 149–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1881-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1881-3

Keywords

Navigation