Skip to main content
Log in

Recruiting Low Income and Racially/Ethnically Diverse Adolescents for Focus Groups

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recruiting and enrolling low income, racially and ethnically diverse adolescents into research studies can be a challenge. This paper details our research team’s methodology in the recruitment and enrollment of low income and racially/ethnically diverse adolescents in three cities as part of a broader study to understand adolescent perceptions of a health risks. Our team used Florida’s Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Plan administrative databases to identify a sample of adolescents for focus group participation. Utilizing geographic information systems software we generated maps of racial and ethnic group clusters in three cities and identified community centers within each cluster to hold the focus groups. We mailed initial focus group introduction letters, conducted follow-up phone calls for recruitment and further implemented techniques to optimize participant confidentiality and comfort. We enrolled 35 participants for eight focus groups in three cities at a total cost of $264 per participant, including personnel, materials, travel, and incentives costs. As a result of our efforts, groups were fairly evenly distributed by both race and gender. Administrative databases provide opportunities to identify and recruit low income and racially/ethnically diverse adolescents for focus groups that might not otherwise have the opportunity to participate in research studies. It is important that researchers ensure these populations are represented when conducting health assessment tool evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UyBico, S., Pavel, S., & Gross, C. (2007). Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: A systematic review of recruitment interventions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 852–863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Corbie-Smith, G. (2004). Minority recruitment and participation in health research. North Carolina Medical Journal, 65, 385–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanton, S., DM, M., Prettyman, M., McCulloch, K., Redmond, S., & Light, K. (2006). Lessons learned in participant recruitment and retention: The EXCITE trial. Physical Therapy, 86, 1520–1533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akers, A. Y., Gold, M. A., Coyne-Beasley, T., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2012). A qualitative study of rural black adolescents’ perspectives on primary STD prevention strategies. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 44(2), 92–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balch, G. I. (1998). Exploring perceptions of smoking cessation among high school smokers: Input and feedback from focus groups. Preventive Medicine, 27(5 Pt 3), A55–A63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzales, R., Anglin, M. D., Beattie, R., Ong, C. A., & Glik, D. C. (2012). Understanding recovery barriers: Youth perceptions about substance use relapse. American Journal of Health Behavior, 36(5), 602–614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosek, S., Brothers, J., & Lemos, D. (2012). Adolescent medicine trials network for HIVAI. What HIV-positive young women want from behavioral interventions: a qualitative approach. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 26(5), 291–297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.In Richard A. Krueger, Mary Anne Casey (Eds.), (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

  9. Hyde, A., Howlett, E., Brady, D., & Drennan, J. (2005). The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 2588–2599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10 [computer program]. Redlands, CA2011.

  11. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, A. (1999). Focus group interviews in health-care research. Professional Nurse (London, England), 14(6), 395–397.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strickland, C. J. (1999). Conducting focus groups cross-culturally: Experiences with Pacific Northwest Indian people. Public Health Nursing, 16(3), 190–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Coker, T. R., Sareen, H. G., Chung, P. J., Kennedy, D. P., Weidmer, B. A., & Schuster, M. A. (2010). Improving access to and utilization of adolescent preventive health care: The perspectives of adolescents and parents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(2), 133–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendez-Luck, C. A., Trejo, L., Miranda, J., Jimenez, E., Quiter, E. S., & Mangione, C. M. (2011). Recruitment strategies and costs associated with community-based research in a Mexican-origin population. The Gerontologist, 51(Suppl 1), S94–S105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyle, R. G., Enstad, C., Asche, S. E., Thoele, M. J., & Sherwood, N. E. (2007). Evaluating strategies and costs to recruit smokeless tobacco users. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 3088–3092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly, P. J., Ahmed, A., Martinez, E., & Peralez-Dieckmann, E. (2007). Cost analysis of obtaining postintervention results in a cohort of high-risk adolescent girls. Nursing Research, 56(4), 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Duda, C., Mahon, I., Chen, M. H., et al. (2011). Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clinical Trials, 8(2), 214–223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hinshaw, L. B., Jackson, S. A., & Chen, M. Y. (2007). Direct mailing was a successful recruitment strategy for a lung-cancer screening trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(8), 853–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keyzer, J. F., Melnikow, J., Kuppermann, M., et al. (2005). Recruitment strategies for minority participation: Challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview. Ethnicity and Disease, 15(3), 395–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Margitić, S., Sevick, M. A., Miller, M., et al. (1999). Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices into a physical activity intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 29(4), 277–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded in part by the Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida UL1-RR029890; David Nelson, MD, Principal Investigator; Elizabeth Shenkman, PhD, Co-Investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Sberna Hinojosa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinojosa, M.S., Kadivar, H., Fernandez-Baca, D. et al. Recruiting Low Income and Racially/Ethnically Diverse Adolescents for Focus Groups. Matern Child Health J 18, 1912–1918 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1435-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1435-x

Keywords

Navigation