Skip to main content
Log in

RDF pyrolysis by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS and combustion in a double furnaces reactor

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing depletion of fossil energy, the refuse-derived fuel (RDF) as an unavoidable by-product of human activities has been used as an alternative fuel in the precalciner cement kilns. Since the RDF combustion also brings the problems of NOx pollution, it is quite important to find ways to lower the NOx emission during RDF combustion in the precalciner. The pyrolysis characteristics and products of RDF were studied by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. From TG-FITR and Py-GC/MS tests, various carboxylic acids and alkenes formed with NOx released at the RDF pyrolysis process at 200–550 °C. By simulating the temperature (700 °C, 800 °C and 900 °C) and O2 (12%, 14%, 16%, 18% and 21%) environment of the precalciner using a double furnaces reactor, the combustion processes and NOx formation characteristics of RDF combustion were studied. The results showed that the volatile-N was the dominant reactant source of fuel NOx during RDF combustion. The fuel-N conversion and NOx emission yield showed a continuous decreasing trend with temperature increasing from 700 to 900 °C. The fuel-N conversion and NOx emission yield showed a slight increasing trend with the oxygen concentration increase, and the optimum oxygen concentration for RDF combustion was 14%. In this study, the optimum temperature was 900 °C and oxygen concentration was 14% for de-NOx in the precalciner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Mustafa K, Esin G, Yasemin T, Ufuk D, Senol Y, Volkan E. Development of refuse derived fuel for cement factories in Turkey. Combust Sci Technol. 2010;183:203–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen T, Zhan MX, Lin XQ, Li YQ, Zhang J, Li XD, Yan JH, Buekens A. Emission and distribution of PCDD/Fs and CBzs from two co-processing RDF cement plants in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:11845–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahman A, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Sharma S. Impact of alternative fuels on the cement manufacturing plant performance: an overview. Procedia Eng. 2013;56:393–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. García AN, Marcilla A, Font R. Thermogravimetric kinetic study of the pyrolysis of municipal solid waste. Thermochim Acta. 1995;254:277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin KS, Wang HP, Liu SH, Chang NB, Huang YJ, Wang HC. Pyrolysis kinetics of refuse-derived fuel. Fuel Process Technol. 1999;60:103–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yi Q, Qi F, Cheng G, Zhang YG, Xiao B, Hu ZQ, Liu SM, Cai HY, Xu S. Thermogravimetric analysis of co-combustion of biomass and biochar. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:1475–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizuta R, Izato YI, Miyake A. Thermal ignition behavior of waste woods mixed with unsaturated fatty acids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coriolano ACF, Oliveira AAA, Bandeira RAF, Fernandes VJ, Araujo AS. Kinetic study of thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of Brazilian heavy crude oil over mesoporous Al-MCM-41 materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119:2151–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro KKV, Figueiredo AL, Gondim AD, Coriolano ACF, Alves APM, Fernandes VJ, Araujo AS. Pyrolysis of atmospheric residue of petroleum (ATR) using AlSBA-15 mesoporous material by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:953–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanislav H, Dagmar J, Adam C, Tomasz W. Gaseous components from pyrolysis-characteristics, production and potential for energy utilization. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;106:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou H, Jensen AD, Glarborg P, Kavaliauskas A. Formation and reduction of nitric oxide in fixed-bed combustion of straw. Fuel. 2006;85:705–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian FP, Chyang CS, Huang KS, Jim T. Combustion and NO emission of high nitrogen content biomass in a pilot-scale vortexing fluidized bed combustor. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:1892–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan F, Liu J, Chyang CS, Hu CH, Tso J. Combustion behavior and pollutant emission characteristics of RDF (refuse derived fuel) and sawdust in a vortexing fluidized bed combustor. Energy. 2013;57:421–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Francisco D, Changkook R, Vida N, Jim S. Combustion of refuse-derived fuel in a fluidised bed. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:627–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akinori Y, Yuri K, Kenji K, Nelfa D, Kuniyuki K. In-situ monitoring of toxic heavy metals from RDF combustion by two-dimensional atomic absorption spectrometry. Combust Sci Technol. 2010;183:1297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crujeira T, Lopes H, Abelha P, Sargaço C, Gonçalves R, Freire M, Cabrita I, Gulyurtlu I. Study of toxic metals during combustion of RDF in a fluidized bed pilot. Environ Eng Sci. 2005;22:241–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrer E, Aho M, Silvennoinen J, Nurminen RV. Fluidized bed combustion of refuse-derived fuel in presence of protective coal ash. Fuel Process Technol. 2005;87:33–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wagland ST, Kilgallon P, Coveney R, Garg A, Smith R, Longhurst PJ, Pollard SJT, Simms N. Comparison of coal/solid recovered fuel (SRF) with coal/refuse derived fuel (RDF) in a fluidised bed reactor. Waste Manag. 2011;31:1176–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong TT, Lee BK. Analysis of potential RDF resources from solid waste and their energy values in the largest industrial city of Korea. Waste Manag. 2009;29:1725–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Genon G, Brizio E. Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF. Waste Manag. 2008;28:2375–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miskolczi N, Buyong F, Williams PT. Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis kinetic study of Malaysian refuse derived fuels. J Energy Inst. 2016;83:125–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grammelis P, Basinas P, Malliopoulou A, Sakellaropoulos G. Pyrolysis kinetics and combustion characteristics of waste recovered fuels. Fuel. 2009;88:195–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sorum L, Gronli MG, Hustad JE. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of municipal solid wastes. Fuel. 2000;80:1217–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill SC, Douglas SL. Modeling of nitrogen oxides formation and destruction in combustion systems. Energy Combust Sci. 2000;26:417–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Velden MVD, Baeyens J, Dougan B, McMurdob A. Investigation of operational parameters for an industrial CFB combustor of coal, biomass and sludge. Particuology. 2007;5:247–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bosch H, Jamssen F. Formation and control of nitrogen oxides. Catal Today. 1988;2:369–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong BJ, Roslyakov PV. Study on prompt NOx emission in boilers. J Therm Sci. 1996;5:143–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Song Y, Beer J, Sarofim A. Nitric oxide formation during pulverized coal combustion. Combust Sci Technol. 1982;28:31–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51502221.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuxia Mei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Xie, J., Mei, S. et al. RDF pyrolysis by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS and combustion in a double furnaces reactor. J Therm Anal Calorim 136, 893–902 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7694-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7694-9

Keywords

Navigation