Abstract
This paper reports on the efficacy of a professional development framework premised on four complex systems design principles: Feedback, Adaptation, Network Growth and Self-organization (FANS). The framework is applied to the design and delivery of the first 2 years of a 3-year study aimed at improving teacher and student understanding of computational modeling tools. We demonstrate that structuring a professional development program around the FANS framework facilitates the development of important strategies and processes for program organizers such as the identification of salient system variables, effectively distributing expertise, adaptation and improvement of professional development resources and activities and building technological, human and social capital. For participants, there is evidence to show that the FANS framework encourages: professional goal setting, engagement in a strong professional community and personal autonomy by enabling individualized purpose—all fundamental components in promoting self-organization. We discuss three meta-level themes that may account for the success of the FANS framework: structure versus agency, exploration versus exploitation and short-term versus long-term goals. Each illustrates the tension that exists between competing variables that need to be considered in order to work effectively in real world complex educational systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow H., McGrath J., Berdahl J. (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems. Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
Axelrod R., Cohen M. (1999) Harnessing Complexity. The Free Press, New York
Bar-Yam Y. (1997) Dynamics of Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass
Capra F. (1996) The Web of Life. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., New York
Coburn C. (2003) Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher 32(6): 3–12
Colella, V., and Klopfer, E. (2000). Seeding change: Bringing modeling to science teachers and their students. The Bulletin of The Santa Fe Institute 15: 2
Colella V., Klopfer E., Resnick M. (2001) Adventures in Modeling. Teachers College Press, New York
Cuban L., Kirkpatrick H., Peck C. (2002) High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal 38(4): 813–834
Dede C., Honan J. (2005) Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In: Dede C., Honan J., Peters L. (Eds.), Scaling Up Success: Lessons Learned from Technology-Based Educational Improvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 227–239
Elmore R. (1996) Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 1–26
Fishman B., Marx R., Blumenfeld P., Krajcik J., Soloway E. (2004) Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(1): 43–76
Fullan M. (1993) Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. The Falmer Press, London
Fullan M. (1999) Change Forces: The Sequel. The Falmer Press, London
Fullan M. (2003) Changes Forces: With a Vengeance. RoutledgeFalmer, London
Gell-Mann M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
Goldman S. (2005) Designing for scalable educational improvement. In: Dede C., Honan J., Peters L. (Eds.), Scaling Up Success: Lessons Learned from Technology-Based Educational Improvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 67–96
Hmelo C., Holton D., Kolodner J., (2000) Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(3): 247–298
Holland J. (1998) Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Helix, Reading, MA
Johnson S. (2001) Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. Simon & Schuster, New York
Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe, Oxford University Press, New York
Klopfer E., Yoon S., Perry J. (2005) Using palm technology in participatory simulations of complex systems: A new take on ubiquitous and accessible mobile computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14(3): 285–298
Lemke J. (2001) The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(1&2): 17–26
Liljenstrom H., Svedin U. (2005) Micro Meso Macro: Addressing Complex Systems Coupling. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., London
Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. (2000) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Densin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Putnam R. (2000) Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster, New York
Reiser B. J., Spillane J. P., Steinmuller F., Sorsa D., Carney K., Kyza E. (2000) Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers’ design of technology-infused curricula. In: Fishman B., O’Conner-Divelbiss S. (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 342–349
Senge P., Cambron-McCabe N., Lucas T., Smith B., Dutton J., Kleiner A. (2000) Schools that Learn. Doubleday, New York
Sterman J. D. (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Boston
Strauss A. L., Corbin J. M. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2 edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Varela F. (1999) Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
Watts D. (2003) Six Degrees. W. W. Norton, Company, Inc., New York
Yi-Zhang T., Kim J., (2005) Macro-, Meso-, Micro- and Nano-Mechanics of Materials. Trans Tech Publications Inc., Zurich
Acknowledgements
We would like to gratefully acknowledge Judy Perry for her assistance on the data analysis portion of this paper. This research was supported by a National Science Foundation ITEST Grant (Award # 0322573).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, S.A., Klopfer, E. Feedback (F) Fueling Adaptation (A) Network Growth (N) and Self-Organization (S): A Complex Systems Design and Evaluation Approach to Professional Development. J Sci Educ Technol 15, 353–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9024-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9024-4