Abstract
Hybrid nanocomposites based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) embedded with nanoscopic Ag particles were prepared by two distinct approaches: in situ and ex situ chemical processing routes. The effect of Ag loading on tailored optical and electrical responses in the two classes of metal–polymer nanocomposites (MPNs) was investigated. Transmission electron microscopy of the in situ MPN sample revealed core–shell-type combination comprising Ag nanoparticles lying at the core surrounded by polymeric (PEG) shell. On the other hand, ex situ MPNs exhibited dispersed phase microstructure with uneven distribution of Ag nanoparticles in the PEG matrix. Comparison of the thermal properties of in situ and ex situ MPNs confirmed that the MPN obtained through in situ process with 2 wt% of Ag contents displayed higher thermal stability (≈18%) relative to ex situ MPN of the same composition. The absorption spectrum confirmed clear, blue shift with enhanced band gap in the case of in situ MPN relative to its ex situ counterpart. The Ag–PEG nanocomposites prepared by both the processes exhibited metallic I–V response. Electrical transport observed in terms of resistivity variation with temperature confirmed typical semiconducting behavior in the composite phase in sharp contrast to the insulating property of the host PEG. A large decrease (≈65%) in activation energy was observed in the case of in situ MPN at higher loading of Ag possibly because of the higher mobility assisted by tunneling of charge carriers through polymeric spacers in the composite phase. The drastic improvement in optical and electrical responses of the nanocomposites indicated the suitability for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chatterjee S (2008) J Mater Sci 43:1696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2376-1
Jager C, Bilke R, Heim M, Haarer D, Karickal H, Thelakkat M (2001) Synth Metals 121:1543
Karim SMA, Nomura R, Sanda F, Seki S, Watanabe M, Masuda T (2003) Macromolecules 36:4786
Pal K, Kang DJ, Zhang ZX, Kim JK (2010) Langmuir 26:3609
Nicolais L, Carotenuto G (2005) Metal-polymer nanocomposites. Johan Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (2003) Nanocomposite science and technology. Wiley VCH Verlag, GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Leventis HC, King SP, Sudlow A, Hill MS, Molloy KC, Haque SA (2010) Nano Lett 10:1253
Yuan Y-Y, Liu X-Q, Wang Y-C, Wang J (2009) Langmuir 23:2126
Chen Q, Yue L, Xie F, Zhou M, Fu Y, Zhang Y, Weng J (2008) J Phys Chem 112:10004
Kickelbick G (2003) Prog Polym Sci 28:83
Panigrahi S, Kundu S, Ghosh SK, Nath S, Pal T (2004) J Nanopart Res 6:411
Temgire MK, Joshi SS (2004) Rad Phys Chem 71:1039
Mukherjee B, Mukherjee M (2009) Appl Phys Lett 94:73510-1
Khanna PK, Singh N, Charan S, Subbarao VVVS, Gokhale R, Mulik UP (2005) Mater Chem Phys 93:117
Lu J, Moon K-S, Xu J, Wong CP (2006) J Mater Chem 16:1543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/b514182f
Ohnuma A, Cho EC, Jiang M, Ohtani B, Xia Y (2009) Langmuir 25:13880
Rajesh, Ahuja T, Kumar D (2009) Sens Actuators B 136:275
Kim D, Park S, Lee JH, Jeong YY, Jon S (2007) J Am Chem Soc 129:7661
Khemtong C, Kessinger CW, Gao J (2009) Chem Commn 24:3497
Fu S-Y, Feng X-Q, Lauke B, Mai Y-W (2008) Compos Part B 39:933
Mayer ABR (1998) Mater Sci Eng C 6:155
Faupel F, Zaporojtchenko V, Strunskus T, Elbahri M (2010) Adv Eng Mater 112:1177
Pakula C, Zaporojtchenko V, Strunskus T, Herges R, Faupel F (2010) Nanotechnology 21:465201
Bernabo M, Pucci A, Ramanitra HH, Ruggeri G (2010) Materials 3:1461
Gupta K, Jana PC, Meikap AK (2010) Synth Metals 160:1566
Yu D-G, Lin W-C, Lin C-H, Chang L-M, Yang M-C (2007) Mater Chem Phys 101:93
Mukherjee S, Mukherjee M (2006) J Phys Condens Matter 18:11233
Datta H, Bhowmick AK, Singha NK (2009) Polymer 50:3259
Mbhele ZH, Salemane MG, Sittert CGCEV, Nedeljkovic JM, Djokovic V, Luyt AS (2003) Chem Mater 15:5019
Bai J, Li Y, Du J, Wang S, Zheng J, Yang Q, Chen X (2007) Mater Chem Phys 106:412
Gautam A, Ram S (2010) Mater Chem Phys 119:266
Sadhu S, Bhowmick AK (2005) J Mater Sci 40:1633–1642 https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-005-0663-2
Bandyopadhyay A, Sarkar MD, Bhowmick AK (2005) J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 43:2399
Kar S, Bhowmick AK (2009) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:3144
Ganguly A, Bhowmick AK (2008) Macromolecules 41:6246
Maiti M, Bhowmick AK (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 111:1094
Bhattacharya M, Bhowmick AK (2010) Rubber Chem Technol 83:16
Lee PC, Meisel D (1982) J Phys Chem 86:3391
Streetman B, Banerjee S (2000) Solid state electronic devices. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Acknowledgements
The financial support of IIT Patna is gratefully acknowledged to enable the authors undertake this study. VC is thankful to the Director, IIT Patna, for providing the laboratory and instrumentation facilities. Thanks are also due to the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi for providing the facilities of TEM. Special thanks are also due to the co-workers of Prof A K Bhowmick, who are working in the Rubber Technology Centre, IIT Kharagpur, for their valuable cooperation during experiments. AKB is thankful to DST, New Delhi and Commonwealth of Australia for providing Indo-Australia Strategic Research Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaudhary, V., Thakur, A.K. & Bhowmick, A.K. Improved optical and electrical response in metal–polymer nanocomposites for photovoltaic applications. J Mater Sci 46, 6096–6105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5573-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5573-x