Skip to main content
Log in

Computing Abilities in Antiquity: The Royal Judahite Storage Jars as a Case-study

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying the volume of ancient pottery vessels can shed light on the development of complex societies and state apparatus by revealing the means taken to standardize trade and taxation. It can also shed light on the cognitive abilities of ancient people by investigating their knowledge of computing. This paper explores, as a case study, the volume and shape of the lmlk (“belonging to the king”) royal storage jars, which probably represent the highest level of standardization in eighth century BCE Judah. To estimate the volume of these vessels we constructed a computer 3D model for each jar. The variation in the jars’ linear dimensions is about 2–3%, a number that is characteristic of human-made objects produced by professionals without employing measurement tools. Had the potters produced jars of the same height, they could have easily reached 3–4% accuracy in the volume. Surprisingly, the variation in the jars’ volume is 7–10%. We hypothesize that rather than height the potters focused on the jars’ shape and wall width, estimating the volume according to the jars’ outer measurements. We propose a simple way that these measurements could have been taken and suggest a formula that could have been employed by the potters and customers for quickly calculating a jar’s volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharoni, Y. (1973). Beer-Sheba I: Excavations at Tel Beer-Sheba. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aharoni, Y. (1981). Arad inscriptions. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. E. (1988). Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkay, G., & Vaughn, A. G. (2004). The royal and official seal impressions from Lachish. In D. Ussishkin (Ed.), The renewed archaeological excavations at Lachish (1973–1994) (pp. 2148–2173). Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Arieh, I. (1999). Tel Ira: A stronghold in the Biblical Negev. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. (2004). The meanings of standardization: Conical cups in the Late Bronze Age Aegean. Antiquity, 78, 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biran, A., & Cohen, R. (1981). Aroer in the Negev. Eretz-Israel, 15, 251–272 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, K. S. (1999). Pithoi and food storage in Neopalatial Crete: A domestic perspective. World Archaeology, 31(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, K. S. (2005). Cretan Bronze Age Pithoi: Traditions and trends in the production and consumption of storage containers in Bronze Age Crete (Prehistory Monographs 18). Philadelphia: INSTAP Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. L. (1996). Craft production and mobilization strategies in the Inka Empire. In B. Wailes (Ed.), Craft specialization and social evolution: In memory of V. Gordon Childe (pp. 211–255). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumas, C., & Constantinides, A. G. (1990). Pithoi, size and symbols: Some preliminary considerations on the Akrotiri evidence. In D. A. Hardy (Ed.), Thera and the Aegean World III, Vol. I (pp. 41–43). London: The Thera Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W. (2000). Practice makes within 5% of perfect: Visual perception, motor skills, and memory in artifact variation. Current Antropology, 41(4), 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W., & Bettinger, R. L. (2001). Techniques for assessing standardization in artifact assemblages: Can we scale material variability? American Antiquity, 66(3), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitan, A. (Ed.) (1973). Inscriptions reveal. Jerusalem: Israel Museum (Hebrew).

  • Ephal, I., & Naveh, J. (1993). The jar of the gate. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 289, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, I. (1995). Living on the Fringe: The archaeology and history of the Negev, Sinai and neighboring regions in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Sheffield: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, I. (1999). State formation in Israel and Judah: A contrast in context, a contrast in trajectory. Near Eastern Archaeology, 62, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitin, S. (1990). Gezer III: A ceramic typology of the Late Iron II, Persian and Hellenistic Periods at Tell Gezer. Jerusalem: Hebrew Union College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, L. L. (Ed.) (2003). “Like a bird in a cage”: The Invasion of Sennacherib in 701 BCE. Sheffield: Academic Press.

  • Herzog, Z., Aharoni, M., Rainey, A. F., & Moshkovitz, S. (1984). The Israelite fortress at Arad. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 254, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson-Drake, D. (1991). Scribes and schools in Monarchic Judah: A socio-archeological approach. Sheffield: Almond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasik, A., & Smilanski, U. (2006). Computation of the capacity of pottery vessels based on drawn profiles. In A. Mazar (Ed.), Excavations at Tel Beth Shean 1989–1996 Vol. 1 (pp. 392–394). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society and the Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsa-Tomara, L. (1990). The Pottery-production system at Akrotiri: An index of exchange and social activity. In D. A. Hardy (Ed.), Thera and the Aegean World III, Vol. I (pp. 31–40). London: The Thera Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletter, R. (1998). Economic keystones: The weight system of the Kingdom of Judah. Sheffield: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochavi, M. (1973). Khirbet Rabud=Debir. Tel Aviv, 1, 2–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A. (Ed.) (1991). Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

  • Mazar, A., & Panitz-Cohen, N. (2001). Timnah (Tel Batash) II (Qedem 42). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R., & Wheeler, C. (2008, accessed) Methods of calculating the capacity of pottery vessels PotWeb: Ceramics Online. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology. http://www.ashmolean.org/PotWeb/NewBodleian/11-Calculating.html.

  • Mommsen, H., Perlman, I., & Yellin, J. (1984). The provenience of the lmlk jars. Israel Exploration Journal, 34, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. A. (1992). Weights and measures. The Anchor Bible Dictionary, 6, 897–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1987). Pottery analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, L. M., & Birnie, D. P. (1995). Accurately estimating vessel volume from profile illustrations. American Antiquity, 60, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer-Avitz, L. (2002). Arad: The Iron Age pottery assemblages. Tel Aviv, 29, 110–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. M. (1988). The organization of craft production at Vijanagara, south India. American Antropologist, 90(3), 580–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. M. (1991). Approaches to archaeological ceramics. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M. (1992). Pottery function: A use-alteration perspective. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, D. (1978). Excavations at Tel Lachish - 1973–1977. Preliminary report. Tel Aviv, 5, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, D. (1982). The conquest of Lachish by Sennacherib. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, D. (2004). The royal Judean storage jars and seal impressions from the renewed excavations. In D. Ussishkin (Ed.), The renewed archaeological excavations at Lachish (1973–1994) (pp. 2133–2147). Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S. E., & Pritchard, A. C. (Eds.) (1984). The many dimensions of pottery in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

  • Vaughn, A. G. (1999). Theology, history, and archaeology in the chronicler’s account of Hezekiah. Atlanta: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapassky, E., Finkelstein, I., & Benenson, I. (2006). Ancient standards of volume: Negevite Iron Age pottery (Israel) as a case study in 3D modeling. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1734–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimhoni, O. (2004). The pottery of Levels III and II. In D. Ussishkin (Ed.),The renewed archaeological excavations at Lachish (1973–1994) (pp. 1789–1899). Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Avshalom Karasik and Talia Goldman, both PhD students at the Hebrew University and guest students at the Weizmann Institute of Science, for their help with the 3D scanner; Debby Ben-Ami of the Israel Antiquities Authority and Michal Dayagi and Eran Arie of the Israel Museum for providing us access to the stamped storage jars; and Myrna Pollak for editing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itzhak Benenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zapassky, E., Finkelstein, I. & Benenson, I. Computing Abilities in Antiquity: The Royal Judahite Storage Jars as a Case-study. J Archaeol Method Theory 16, 51–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9059-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9059-3

Keywords

Navigation