Skip to main content
Log in

What’s Wrong with Einstein’s 1927 Hidden-Variable Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Einstein’s unpublished 1927 deterministic trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics is critically examined, in particular with regard to the reason given by Einstein for rejecting his theory. It is shown that the aspect Einstein found objectionable—the mutual dependence of the motions of particles when the (many-body) wavefunction factorises—is a generic attribute of his theory but that this feature may be removed by modifying Einstein’s method in either of two ways: using a suggestion of Grommer or, in a physically important special case, using a simpler technique. It is emphasized though that the presence or absence of the interdependence property does not determine the acceptability of a trajectory theory. It is shown that there are other grounds for rejecting Einstein’s theory (and the two modified theories), to do with its domain of applicability and compatibility with empirical predictions. That Einstein’s reason for rejection is not a priori grounds for discarding a trajectory theory is demonstrated by reference to an alternative deterministic trajectory theory that displays similar particle interdependence yet is compatible with quantum predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. T Cushing (1994) Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Pais (1982) Subtle is the Lord. . . F The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Fine (1986) The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory University of Chicago Press Chicago 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Howard (1990) ‘‘‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s early worries about the quantum mechanics of composite systems’‘ A. I. Miller (Eds) Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty Plenum Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. W. Belousek (1996) ArticleTitle ‘‘Einstein’s1927 unpublished hidden-variable theory its background, context and significance’‘ Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys 27 437

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. P. Eisenhart (1966) Riemannian Geometry Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Prizbram (Eds) (1967) Letters on Wave Mechanics Vision Press London 23–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Debever (Eds) (1979) Elie Cartan–-Albert Einstein: Letters on Absolute Parallelism Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Jammer (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics Wiley New York 164–165

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Born (1971) The Born-Einstein Letters Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Electrons et Photons. Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique, 1927 (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928), pp. 255–256 (English translation in: Niels Bohr Collected Works, J. Kalckar, ed. Vol 6, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985), pp. 101–103).

  12. P. R. Holland (2000) The Quantum Theory of Motion Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Holland C. Philippidis (2003) ArticleTitle‘‘Implications of Lorentz covariance for the guidance formula in two-slit quantum interference’‘ Phys. Rev. A 67 062105

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. R. Holland (1998) ArticleTitle‘‘New trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics’‘ Found. Phys. 28 881

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Holland (2001) ArticleTitle‘‘Hamiltonian Theory of Wave and Particle in Quantum Mechanics I, II’‘ Nuovo Cimento B 116 1043–1143

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Einstein (1948) ArticleTitle‘‘Quantum mechanics and reality’‘ Dialectica 2 320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Holland.

Additional information

PACS: 03.65.Bz.

Essay written in memory of J.T. Cushing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holland, P. What’s Wrong with Einstein’s 1927 Hidden-Variable Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?. Found Phys 35, 177–196 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1940-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1940-7

Keywords

Navigation