Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Phase II, open-label, randomised study to assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) versus capecitabine monotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer who have failed one or two prior chemotherapeutic regimens

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed one or two previous chemotherapeutic regimens that included oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. Methods This was a Phase II, multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, parallel-group study comparing AZD6244 with capecitabine monotherapy. Patients received either 100 mg twice daily oral AZD6244 free-base suspension every day or 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily oral capecitabine, for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period, in 3-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing disease progression events. Results Sixty-nine patients were randomised in the study (34 and 35 patients in the AZD6244 and capecitabine groups, respectively). Disease progression events were experienced by 28 patients (∼80%) in both the AZD6244 and capecitabine treatment groups. Median progression-free survival was 81 days and 88 days in the AZD6244 and capecitabine groups, respectively. Ten patients in the AZD6244 treatment arm had a best response of stable disease. For capecitabine, best response was a partial response in one patient, with stable disease in a further 15 patients. The most frequently observed adverse events reported with AZD6244 were acneiform dermatitis, diarrhoea, asthenia and peripheral oedema, compared with hand-foot syndrome, diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain with capecitabine. Conclusions AZD6244 showed similar efficacy to capecitabine in terms of the number of patients with a disease progression event and of progression-free survival. AZD6244 is currently undergoing evaluation in Phase II trials in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kolch W, Kotwaliwale A, Vass K, Janosch P (2002) The role of Raf kinases in malignant transformation. Expert Rev Mol Med 4:1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang D, Boerner SA, Winkler JD, Lorusso PM (2007) Clinical experience of MEK inhibitors in cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773:1248–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JY, Wilcoxen KM, Nomoto K, Wu S (2007) Recent Advances of MEK Inhibitors and Their Clinical Progress. Curr Top Med Chem 7:1364–1378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies BR, Logie A, McKay JS et al (2007) AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther 6:2209–2219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh TC, Marsh V, Bernat BA et al (2007) Biological characterization of ARRY-142886 (AZD6244), a potent, highly selective mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 13:1576–1583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adjei AA, Cohen RB, Franklin W et al (2008) Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol 26:2139–2146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ et al (2009) Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27:3677–3683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JJ, Kim TM, Yu SJ et al (2004) Single-agent capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:400–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubinstein LV, Korn EL, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy SP, Smith MA (2005) Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol 23:7199–7206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll K (2004) Progression as an endpoint in CRC. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/04/slides/4037OPH2_01_Carrol.ppt. Accessed June 2009

  13. Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP et al (2005) Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2696–2704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, Butts C et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study. Ann Oncol 19:1720–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diaz-Rubio E, Tabernero J, Gomez-Espana A et al (2007) Phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final report of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors Trial. J Clin Oncol 25:4224–4230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tzekova V, Cebotaru C, Ciuleanu T et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) as second- or third-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:Abstr. 8029

  17. Dummer R, Robert C, Chapman PB et al (2008) AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) vs temozolomide (TMZ) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: an open-label, randomized, multi-center, phase II study. J Clin Oncol 26:Abstr. 9033

  18. Agarwal R, Banergi U, Camidge CR et al (2008) The first-in-human study of the solid oral dosage form of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): a phase I trial in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:Abstr. 3535

  19. Sarker D, Banergi U, Agarwal R et al (2008) Relative oral bioavailability of the hydrogen sulphate (Hyd-sulfate) capsule and free-base suspension formulations of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): A Phase I trial in patients with advanced cancer. Ann Oncol 19:viii153–viii165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was a Phase II trial sponsored by AstraZeneca. We thank Dr Sally Humphries, from MediTech Media, who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Yves Douillard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennouna, J., Lang, I., Valladares-Ayerbes, M. et al. A Phase II, open-label, randomised study to assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) versus capecitabine monotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer who have failed one or two prior chemotherapeutic regimens. Invest New Drugs 29, 1021–1028 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9392-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9392-8

Keywords

Navigation