Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of urbanization on Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population connectivity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization may affect genetic differentiation among animal populations because it converts native vegetation to novel land cover types that can affect population connectivity. The effect of land cover change on genetic differentiation may vary among taxa; mobile birds may be least affected. Regardless, genetic differentiation between populations should be best predicted by measures of distance that incorporate the effect of land cover on movement. We studied the relationship between land cover and genetic differentiation in Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) at eighteen sites in the Seattle metropolitan region. We generated a series of hypothetical “resistance surfaces” based on land cover and development age, calculated “resistance distances” between pairs of sampling sites, and related them to pairwise genetic differentiation. Genetic differentiation was best described by a multiple regression model where resistance to gene flow (1) linearly increased with age of development and (2) was greater in high- and medium-density urbanization than in native forest land cover types (R 2 = 0.15; p = 0.003). The single variable with the highest correlation with genetic differentiation was derived from a linear relationship between development age and resistance (R 2 = 0.08; p = 0.007). Our results thus suggested that urban development reduced population connectivity for Song Sparrows. However, the relation of development age to genetic differentiation suggested that equilibrium was not yet reached. Hence, the effects of lost connectivity will increase. Our understanding of the landscape genetics of this recently anthropogenically modified landscape benefited from considering population history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KM, Gibbons JW (2005) How do highways influence snake movement? Behavioral responses to roads and vehicles. Copeia 4:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcese P, Sogge MK, Marr AB, Patten MA (2002) Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, vol 704. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctander P (1988) Comparative studies of avian DNA by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: convenient procedures based on blood samples from live birds. J Ornithol 129:S205–S216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arguedas N, Parker PG (2000) Seasonal migration and genetic population structure in house wrens. Condor 102:517–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow and population structure. Quart Rev Biol 74:21–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper CF (2001) M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. Biotechniques 31:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by tag DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20:1004–1010

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 225–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y, Arcese P (2002) Subspecific differentiation and conservation of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) in the San Francisco Bay region inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Auk 119:641–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y, Arcese P (2003) Morphological and microsatellite differentiation in Melospiza melodia (Aves) at a microgeographic scale. J Evol Biol 16:939–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crochet P-A (1996) Can measures of gene flow help to evaluate bird dispersal? Acta Oecol 17:459–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney KS, Riley SPD, Fisher RN (2010) A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12767. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly RE (2002) Design of habitat reserves and settlements for bird conservation in the Seattle metropolitan area. University of Washington, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9:99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (2002) ArcView 3.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

  • Garroway CJ, Bowman J, Wilson PJ (2011) Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers, Martes pennanti. Mol Ecol 20:3978–3988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RJ, Reed JM (2002) Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds. Ann Zool Fenn 35:275–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2000) Genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery KJ, Keller LF, Arcese P, Bruford MW (2001) The development of microsatellite loci in the Song Sparrow, Melospiza melodia (Aves) and genotyping errors associated with good quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 1:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G (2010) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19:4179–4191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Yaw JA, Davidson A, McRae BH, Green DM (2009) Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Mol Ecol 18:1863–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Mertig AG, Liu JI (2003) Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biol Conserv 115:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall-Shackleton EA, Clinchy M, Zanette L, Neff BD (2012) Songbird genetic diversity is lower in anthropogenically versus naturally fragmented landscapes. Conserv Genet 12:1195–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp 19–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Rodewald AD (2008) Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities Environ 1:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Withey JC, Whittaker KA, Oleyar MD, Unfried TM, Rullman S, Delap J (2007) Consequences of habitat utilization by nest predators and breeding songbirds across multiple scales in an urbanizing landscape. Condor 109:516–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology and conservation. Ecology 10:2712–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirmans PG (2006) Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 60:2399–2402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett CL, Arcese P, Chan YL, Wilson AG, Patten MA, Keller LF, Winker K (2008a) Concordant and discordant signals between genetic data and described subspecies of Pacific Coast Song Sparrows. Condor 110:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett CL, Arcese A, Chan YL, Wilson AG, Patten MA, Keller LF, Winker K (2008b) The effects of contemporary processes in maintaining the genetic structure of western Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Heredity 101:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Regional Council (2007) Population change and net migration. Puget Sound Trends no. D7. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, WA. http://www.psrc.org/assets/785/d7feb07.pdf. Accessed June 2010

  • Ray N (2005) PATHMATRIX: a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol Ecol Notes 5:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Clarke RT, Bond JM, Welters RE, Gliddon CJ (2002) Inferring patterns of dispersal from allele frequency data. In: Bullock JM, Kenward RE, Hails RS (eds) Dispersal ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Notes 8:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sardell RJ, Keller LF, Arcese P, Bucher T, Reid JM (2010) Comprehensive paternity assignment: genotype, spatial location and social status in song sparrows, Melospiza Melodia. Mol Ecol 19:4352–4364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Link WA (2011) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–2010. Version 12.07.2011. Accessed 5 Sept 2012

  • Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, Squires JR, Inman RM, McKelvey KS, Pilgrim KL, Waits LP, Cushman SA (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90:3222–3232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LM, Burgoyne LA (2004) Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecol 4:4. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/4. Accessed June 2010

  • Stenzler LM, Makarewich CA, Coulon A, Ardia DR, Lovette IJ, Winkler DW (2009) Subtle edge-of-range genetic structuring in transcontinentally distributed North American Tree Swallows. Condor 111:470–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GD, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4:16

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed June 2010

  • Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unfried TM (2009) Urban landscape relationships with Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population structure and connectivity and human health and behavior. Dissertation, University of Washington

  • Varvio S-L, Chakraborty R, Nei M (1986) Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics. Heredity 57:189–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veit SL, Robertson RJ, Hamel PB, Friesen VL (2005) Population genetic structure and dispersal across a fragmented landscape in cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea). Conserv Genet 6:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F ST ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82:117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2009) Species-specific survival and relative habitat use in an urban landscape during the postfledging period. Auk 126:288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2012) Post-fledging mobility in an urban landscape. In: Lepczyk CA, Warren PS (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Stud Avian Biol (no. 45). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 183–198

  • Wilson AG, Arcese P, Chan YL, Patten MA (2011) Micro-spatial genetic structure in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Conserv Genet 12:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2004) Metapopulation dynamics: perspectives from landscape ecology. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, London, pp 23–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. Alberti and J. Hepinstall of the University of Washington’s Urban Ecology Research Laboratory provided the classified Landsat TM imagery. Sample collection was aided by M. D. Oleyar, S. Rullman, K. Whittaker, J. Delap, M. Dickerson, and C. Templeton. J. Lawler provided computing resources. Molecular laboratory and analytical assistance was provided by T. R. Seamons, M. Baird, L. Newton, B. Godfrey, and H. D. Bradshaw. The research was conducted under an animal use protocol overseen by the University of Washington IACUC and permits issued by the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife and USGS Bird Banding Laboratory. This material is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to TMU. Project funding was also provided by NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship for Urban Ecology (National Science Foundation awards DEB-9875041, BCS0120024, BCS 0508002 and IGERT0114351), Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter, and University of Washington College of Forest Resources. We thank R. Holderegger and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Unfried.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unfried, T.M., Hauser, L. & Marzluff, J.M. Effects of urbanization on Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population connectivity. Conserv Genet 14, 41–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0422-2

Keywords

Navigation