Abstract
A series of NiMo catalysts supported on MgO–TiO2 (5 mol% TiO2) were prepared and evaluated in hydrodesulfurization applications. The MgO–TiO2 support was obtained by the sol–gel method. The as-obtained MgO–TiO2 support was then impregnated with nickel nitrate, Ni(NO3)2.6H2O and ammonium heptamolybdate, (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O aqueous solutions at pH 9 and pH 5. Subsequently, catalysts were characterized at each step of the preparation: after drying and calcination steps using UV–vis diffuse reflectance (UV–vis-DRS) and Raman spectroscopies and after sulfidation by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The resulting NiMo catalysts were evaluated in hydrodesulfurization, using thiophene (TP) and 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT) as representative sulfur-containing screening molecules. Finally, catalysts were evaluated in a light cycle oil (LCO) hydrodesulfurization reaction. The pH of the impregnation solution of Ni and Mo precursors influences only slightly the nature of the Ni and Mo species formed. Moreover, in both cases, a significant proportion of nickel is lost into spinel compounds leading to a lower propensity of Ni to be accommodated on the edges of MoS2 slabs decreasing the ability to sulfide correctly the NiMo catalysts. Therefore, MgO appears as a too strong interacting support consuming nickel and forming HDS inactive phases even if the addition of TiO2 tends to enhance textural properties.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ristovski ZD, Jayaratne ER, Lim M, Ayoko GA, Morawska L (2006) Influence of diesel fuel sulfur on nanoparticle emissions from City buses. Environ Sci Technol 40:1314–1320
Berhault G (2016) Metal sulfides: novel synthesis methods and recent developments, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Bej SK, Maity SK, Turaga UD (2004) Search for an efficient 4,6-DMDBT hydrodesulfurization catalysts: a review of recent studies. Energy Fuels 18:1227–1237
Topsøe H, Clausen BS, Massoth FE (1996) Hydrotreating catalysis, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin
Ho TC, McConnachie JM (2011) Ultra-deep hydrodesulfurization on MoS2 and Co0.1MoS2: intrinsic vs environmental factors. J Catal 277:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.10.017
Schuit GCA, Gates BCA (1973) Chemistry and engineering of catalytic hydrodesulfurization. AIChE J 19:417–438
Schulz H, Böhringer W, Ousmanov F, Waller P (1999) Refractory sulfur compounds in gas oils. Fuel Proc Technol 61:5–41
Topsøe N, Topsøe H (1983) Characterization of the structures and active sites in sulfided Co-Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalysts by no chemisorption. J Catal 84:386–401
Kibsgaard J, Tuxen A, Knudsen KG, Brorson M, Topsøe H, Lægsgaard E, Lauritsen JV, Besenbacher F (2010) Comparative atomic-scale analysis of promotional effects by late 3d-transition metals in MoS2 hydrotreating catalysts. J Catal 272:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.03.018
Araki Y, Honna K, Shimada H (2002) Formation and catalytic properties of edge-bonded molybdenum sulfide catalysts on TiO2. J Catal 207:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3534
Eijsbouts S, Mayo SW, Fujita K (2007) Unsupported transition metal sulfide catalysts: from fundamentals to industrial application. Appl Catal A 322:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.008
Bailly ML, Chizallet C, Costentin G, Krafft JM, Lauron-Pernot H, Che M (2005) A spectroscopy and catalysis study of the nature of active sites of MgO catalysts: thermodynamic Brønsted basicity versus reactivity of basic sites. J Catal 235:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.09.004
Cinibulk J, Kooyman PJ, Vít Z, Zdrazil M (2003) Magnesia-supported Mo, CoMo and NiMo catalysts prepared by nonaqueous impregnation: parallel HDS/HDN of thiophene and pyridine and TEM microstructure. Catal Lett 89:147–152
Yu AP, Myers EC (1979) US Patent 4, 132,632
Bertolacini RJ, Sue-A-Quan TA (1979) US Patent 4, 140, 626
Chary KVR, Ramakrishna H, Rama-Rao KS, Dhar GM, Rao PK (1991) Hydrodesulfurization on MoS2/MgO. Catal Lett 10:27–34
Kaluža L, Vít Z, Zdražil M (2005) Preparation and properties of filled monolayer of MoO3 deposited on Al2O3 supports by solvent-assisted spreading. Appl Catal A 282:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.12.019
Gandubert AD, Legens C, Guillaume D, Payen E (2006) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy surface quantification of sulfided CoMoP catalysts. relation between activity and promoted sites. Part II: influence of the sulfidation temperature. Surf Interface Anal 38:206–209
Yen PC, Huang YS, Tiong KK (2004) The growth and characterization of rhenium-doped WS2 single crystals. J Phys 16:2171–2180
Okamoto Y, Imanaka T, Teranishi S (1980) Surface structure of CoO-MoO3/Al2O3 catalysts studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Catal 65:448–460
Weber TH, Muijsers JC, van Wolput JHMC, Verhagen CPJ, Niemantsverdriet JW (1996) Basic reaction steps in the sulfidation of crystalline MoO3 to MoS2, as studied by X-ray photoelectron and infrared emission spectroscopy. J Phys Chem 100:14144–14150
Ninh TKT, Massin L, Laurenti D, Vrinat M (2011) A new approach in the evaluation of the support effect for NiMo hydrodesulfurization catalysts. Appl Catal A 407:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.019
Bui NQ, Geantet C, Berhault G (2015) Maleic acid, an efficient additive for the activation of regenerated CoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalysts. J Catal 330:374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.031
Payen E, Hubaut R, Kasztelan S, Poulet O, Grimblot J (1994) Morphology study of MoS2− and WS2− based hydrotreating catalysts by high-resolution electron microscopy. J Catal 147:123–132
Contreras-Valdez Z, Mogica-Betancourt JC, Alvarez-Hernández A, Guevara-Lara A (2013) Solvent effects on dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization: differences between reactions in liquid or gas phase. Fuel 106:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.012
Leofanti G, Padovan M, Tozzola G, Venturelli B (1998) Sufrace area and pore texture of catalysts. Catal Today 41:207–219
López T, Hernández J, Gómez R, Bokhimi X, Boldú JL, Muñoz E, Novaro O, García-Ruíz A (1999) Synthesis and characterization of TiO2–MgO mixed oxides prepared by the sol–gel method. Langmuir 15:5689–5693
Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications. In: Ottewill RH, Rowell RL (eds) Colloid science series, 1st edn. Academic Press, New York
Llorente JMM, Rives V, Malet P, Gil-Llambias FJ (1992) MoO3/MgO systems: effect of preparation method on their physicochemical properties. J Catal 135:1–12
Guevara-Lara A, Bacaud R, Vrinat M (2007) Highly active NiMo/TiO2-Al2O3 catalysts: influence of the preparation and the activation conditions on the catalytic activity. Appl Catal A 328:99–108
Hu H, Wachs IE (1995) Catalytic properties of supported molybdenum oxide catalysts: in situ Raman and methanol oxidation studies. J Phys Chem 99:10911–10922
López-Benítez A, Berhault G, Guevara-Lara A (2016) Addition of manganese to alumina and its influence on the formation of supported NiMo catalysts for dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization application. J Catal 344:59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.08.015
Alstrup IB, Chorkendorff IB, Candia R, Clausen BS, Topsøe H (1982) A combined X-Ray photoelectron and Mossbauer emission spectroscopy of the state of cobalt in sulfided, supported, and unsupported Co-Mo catalysts. J Catal 77:397–409
Sakashita Y (2001) Effects of surface orientation and crystallinity of alumina supports on the microstructures of molybdenum oxides and sulfides. Surf Sci 489:45–58
Mogica-Betancourt JC, López-Benítez A, Montiel-López JR, Massin L, Aouine M, Vrinat M, Berhault G, Guevara-Lara A (2014) Interaction effects of nickel polyoxotungstates with Al2O3–MgO support for application in dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization. J Catal 313:9–23
Roukoss C, Laurenti D, Devers E, Marchand K, Massin L, Vrinat M (2009) Hydrodesulfurization catalysts: promoters, promoting methods and support effect on catalytic activities. C R Chim 12:683–691
Coulier L, Kishan G, van Veen JAR, Niemantsverdriet J (2002) Influence of support-interaction on the sulfidation behavior and hydrodesulfurization activity of Al2O3-supported W, CoW, and NiW model catalysts. J Phys Chem. B 106:5897–5906
Blanchard L, Grimblot J, Bonnelle JP (1986) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies on nickel-tungsten mixed sulfide catalysts. J Catal 98:229–234
Espinós JP, González-Elipe AR, Munuera G (1993) Diffusion of nickel and Surface reconstruction in Ni/TiO2 catalysts promoted by H2 and O2 treatments. Solid State Ionics 63–65:748–754
Girgis MJ, Gates BC (1991) Reactivities, reaction networks, and kinetics in high-pressure catalytic hydroprocessing. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:2021–2058
Vrinat ML (1983) The kinetics of the hydrodesulfurization process- A review. Appl Catal 6:137–158
Meille V, Schulz E, Lemaire M, Vrinat M (1997) Hydrodesulfurization of alkyldibenzothiophenes over a NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst: kinetics and mechanism. J Catal 170:29–36
Oyama ST, Lee YK (2008) The active site of nickel phosphide catalysts for the hydrodesulfurization of 4,6-DMDBT. J Catal 258:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2008.06.023
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge for their support of SEP-CONACYT-ECOS-ANUIES program referenced No. 275186 and CONACYT referenced No. 256345/CB-2015-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Benítez, A., Berhault, G., Silva-Rodrigo, R. et al. Evaluation of the Interest of NiMo Catalysts Supported on MgO–TiO2 for Hydrodesulfurization Applications. Catal Lett 149, 2656–2670 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02831-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02831-6