Skip to main content
Log in

Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: the utilisation of 6 m grass margins

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The utilisation of 6 m countryside stewardship scheme (CSS) grass margins by butterflies was studied at two farms in Essex between 1997 and 2000. The aim of the study was to establish whether grass margins in cereal fields, as set up and managed under CSS guidelines, would be beneficial to common farmland butterflies. Eight 6 m grass margins (total length 3492 m) and two control sections (no margin; total length 700 m) were monitored over the first years of the agreements using the transect method. Significantly greater total numbers of butterflies and individuals of Maniola jurtina were seen on the 6 m grass margins than on the control sections. There was a significant increase in abundance of Maniola jurtina on the margins over the 4-year study period. Significantly more butterflies and Maniola jurtina were seen on the sown 6 m grass margin next to set-aside than on any of the other methods of establishment. Sown next to set-aside was best for Pyronia tithonus, but not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Asher M. Warren R. Fox P. Harding G. Jeffcoate S. Jeffcoate (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland Oxford University Press OxfordUK

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.M. Brakefield T.G. Shreeve J.A. Thomas (1992) Avoidanceconcealment and defence R.L.H. Dennis (Eds) The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain Oxford University Press OxfordUK 93–119

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bullock (1996) Plants W.J. Sutherland (Eds) Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook Cambridge University Press Cambridge 111–137

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.C. Buys (1995) Kansen voor natuur bij braakegging van perceelranden G.R. de Snoo A.J.W. Rotteveel H. Heemsbergen (Eds) Akkerranden in Nederland Werk groep akkerrranden Wageningen, The Netherlands 43–51

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.C. Buys E.B. Oosterveld F.M. Ellenbroek (1996) Kansen Voor Natuur Bij Braak II: Verslag Van een Tweejarig Praktijkonderzoek (No. CLM 253–1996) Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu UtrechtThe Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  6. N.L. Carreck I.H. Williams J.N. Oakley (1999) Enhancing farmland for insect pollinators using flower mixtures Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists WellesbourneUK 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.D. Holbeck H.B. Clausen H.B. Holbeck J. Reddersen (2001) ArticleTitleFactors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark Biological Conservation 18 167–178 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00151-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. de Leeuw G.R. de Snoo W.L.M. Tamis R.J. der Poll (1995) Effecten van akkerranden beheer op de biodiversiteit van insecten fauna G.R. de Snoo A.J.W. Rotteveel H. Heemsbergen (Eds) Akkerranden in Nederland Werk groep akkeranden Wageningen, The Netherlands 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Dover (1994) Arable Field Margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance N. Boatman (Eds) BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation British Crop Protection Council Warwick 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.W. Dover (1997) ArticleTitleConservation headlands: effects on butterfly distribution and behavior AgricultureEcosystems and Environment 63 31–49

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.W. Dover (1999) Butterflies and field margins Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists WellesbourneUK 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  12. O.J. Dunn (1964) ArticleTitleMultiple comparisons using rank sums Technometrics 6 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.H. Feber H. Smith D.W. MacDonald (1996) ArticleTitleThe effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields Journal of Applied Ecology 33 1191–1205

    Google Scholar 

  14. F.B. Goldsmith (Eds) (1991) Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Heath E. Pollard J.A. Thomas (1984) Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland Viking HarmandsworthUK

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.J.P. Marshall (1998) Guidelines for the Siting, Establishment and Management of Arable Field Margins, Beetle Banks, Cereal Conservation Headlands and Wildlife Seed Mixtures IACR Long Ashton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.D. Murphy A.E. Launer P.R. Ehrlich (1983) ArticleTitleThe role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha) Oecologica 56 257–263

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Pollard (1977) ArticleTitleA method for assessing the abundance of butterflies Biological Conservation 12 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Pollard T. Yates (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Smith R.E. Feber P.J. McCallum K. Johnson S.P. Jensen M. Younes D.W. MacDonald (1993) The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins English Nature PeterboroughUK

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Smallshire A.I. Cooke (1999) Field Margins in UK Agri-environmental Schemes Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists WellesbourneUK 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas J.A. 1984. The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. In: The Biology of Butterflies. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Vol. 11, pp. 333–353.

  23. W.B. Watt P.C. Hoch S.G. Mills (1974) ArticleTitleNectar resource use by Colias butterflies Oecologia 14 353–374

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.S. Warren L.K. Barnett D.W. Gibbons M.I. Avery (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing national conservation priorities: an improved red list of British butterflies Biological Conservation 82 317–328

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R.G. Field.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Field, R., Gardiner, T., Mason, C. et al. Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: the utilisation of 6 m grass margins. Biodivers Conserv 14, 1969–1976 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2125-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2125-6

Keywords

Navigation