Skip to main content
Log in

Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the impact of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) vision on laparoscopic performance of novice surgeons is examined. Twenty-five novice surgeons were directed to complete four basic tasks from European Training in Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills (E-BLUS) with both 2D and 3D systems in a random order: task 1: needle guidance, task 2: cutting a circle, task 3: laparoscopic suturing, and task 4: pegs transfer. Quality and quantity scores for each task were measured. Participants completed all of the tasks in one modality of vision and than switched to the other. NASA Task Load Index was used for subjective workload assessment. Statistically significant differences in favor of 3D vision were detected in tasks 1 and 4 both in terms of quality and quantity. In task 2 and task 3, a significantly better performance was observed with the 3D vision only in quantity assessment. The participants who started the tasks in the 3D vision were better in performing the skills in 2D when compared to the participants who started with 2D vision. Overall, the participants reported a better perception of depth and spatial orientation with the 3D mode. Subjective work load was also lower for the tasks performed in 3D. Novice surgeons tended to perform better and felt much more comfortable with 3D in comparison to 2D laparoscopy. Even though previous task experience seemed to have an important impact on laparoscopic performance regardless of imaging modality, 3D laparoscopy seemed to facilitate the learning for novice surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hatzinger M, Badawi JK, Hacker A, Langbein S, Honeck P, Alken P (2006) Georg Kelling (1866–1945): the man who introduced modern laparoscopy into medicine. Der Urologe Ausg A 45(7):868–871. doi:10.1007/s00120-006-1068-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20(5):730–733. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0456-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1(1):40–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmeister J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A, Wade NJ (2001) Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 8(1):12–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24(5):1132–1143. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0740-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, McDougall EM, Landman J (2014) Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol Endourological Soc 28(2):261–266. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, Witte M, Leiner U, Muhlbach L, Ruschin D, Reiner W, Feussner H (2014) Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26(5):1454–1460. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol Endourological Soc 10(4):371–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandopulle SM, Hwang JS, Kuick CH, Lui J, Tan PH, Siow WY, Wong M (2006) Rosai-Dorfman disease of the testis: an unusual entity that mimics testicular malignancy. J Clin Pathol 59(3):325–327. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.028423

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart S, Staveland L (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload Amsterdam: North Holland (pp. 139–183)

  12. Mean Opinion Score (1996–08) International Telecommunication Union recommendation p800 http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.800-199608-I/en

  13. Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E (2013) Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology 82(6):1444–1450. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol Endourological Soc 26(8):1085–1088. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, Chang LS (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64(3):154–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical statement

There were no ethical considerations; no patients were involved in this study. The participants were doctors and students. No personal data was obtained and no treatment was applied to any of the participants.

As there were no ethical considerations, an ethical committee approval was not obtained.

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Özsoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özsoy, M., Kallidonis, P., Kyriazis, I. et al. Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1325–1333 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0

Keywords

Navigation