Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
While the classifications of adult diffuse gliomas according to the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) were considerably updated in the 2016 revision (WHO2016CNS) based on the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion [6, 10], the classification of diffuse gliomas in children and adolescents has not been updated due to a lack of sufficient evidence to do so. The WHO2016CNS instead only gave these lesions tentative nomenclature, such as “pediatric diffuse astrocytoma” and “pediatric-type oligodendroglioma” as a boxed article [10].
The histopathological features of pediatric-type diffuse gliomas (pDGs) are generally non-specific, showing a wide range of variety with significant overlap. They also focally resemble circumscribed gliomas, such as pilocytic astrocytoma [1, 13] and glioneuronal tumors [7]. It is often difficult to determine whether a lesion is diffuse or circumscribed based on a small specimen [1]. The histological features also overlap with those of adult diffuse glioma, which requires conventional glioma regimens combined with chemoradiotherapy that may worsen the normal development of children [8]. Genetic alterations associated with pDG also show significant overlap not only within pDG but also across all gliomas. For instance, the BRAF V600E mutation, which is the most prevalent in pDG, may be present in adult malignant gliomas, such as epithelioid glioblastoma [10]. In addition to these difficulties, pDG may occur in adults, creating further confusion over the diagnosis and treatment of adult gliomas (Fig. 1).
To address such issues, the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW), which will presumably guide future CNS tumor classification, has proposed a novel molecularly oriented approach to the typing of pDG in its updates 4 [2] and 6 [11] (Table 1).
Compared to their adult counterpart, pDGs generally have a prolonged clinical course, even with incomplete resection [16, 18], and may cause long histories (often 2 years or more) of drug-resistant epilepsy; such tumors are thus referred to as long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) [17]. pDG often lacks genetic alterations common in adult-type gliomas, such as IDH mutations and 1p/19q codeletion, and harbor distinctive genetic features [14]. For example, low-grade lesions mainly in the cerebral hemisphere often induce alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway with a single genetic event [12, 20]. In contrast, the malignant ones, occurring in the midline structures, possess somatic mutations in genes encoding histone H3 isoforms, resulting in K27M mutations [5]. Some cerebral hemispheric high-grade gliomas may be associated with histone H3 G34V/R mutations [3, 19]. A unique example is a high-grade cerebral astrocytoma in infant that harbors receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusions, including those in the NTRK family [9, 20]. This tumor often develops as a large, cystic, circumscribed mass with neuronal differentiation and generally has a higher survival rate than seen in typical high-grade gliomas. Other diffuse cerebral high-grade gliomas with glioblastoma-like histology without IDH and H3 mutations can be grouped under the umbrella designation “diffuse pediatric-type high-grade gliomas.” Figure 2 shows the major histology and genetic alterations of pDG [4, 15].
In summary, pDGs need to be distinguished from their adult-type counterparts as their biological behavior and genetic background are significantly different. Unfortunately, a purely molecular approach is currently not always available in daily diagnostic practice, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, such an approach would be scientifically rational and certainly aid in ensuring an accurate diagnosis when only a small specimen is available. Although none of the genetic alterations associated with pDG are histologically or anatomically specific, each alteration’s prevalence conspicuously depends on the tumor’s histology and location. As such, sequential testing of genetic alterations based on the layered integrated approach while considering the histology, location, and genetic information is highly recommended.
References
Collins VP, Jones DTW, Giannini C (2015) Pilocytic astrocytoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol 129:775–788
Ellison DW, Hawkins C, Jones DTW et al (2019) cIMPACT-NOW update 4: diffuse gliomas characterized by MYB, MYBL1, or FGFR1 alterations or BRAF(V600E) mutation. Acta Neuropathol 137:683–687
Jain SU, Khazaei S, Marchione DM et al (2020) Histone H3.3 G34 mutations promote aberrant PRC2 activity and drive tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:27354–27364
Jones DTW, Bandopadhayay P, Jabado N (2019) The power of human cancer genetics as revealed by low-grade gliomas. Annu Rev Genet 53:483–503
Khuong-Quang DA, Buczkowicz P, Rakopoulos P et al (2012) K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 124:439–447
Komori T (2020) Updating the grading criteria for adult diffuse gliomas: beyond the WHO2016CNS classification. Brain Tumor Pathol 37:1–4
Komori T, Arai N (2013) Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, a pure glial tumor? Immunohistochemical and morphometric studies. Neuropathology 33:459–468
Krishnatry R, Zhukova N, Guerreiro Stucklin AS et al (2016) Clinical and treatment factors determining long-term outcomes for adult survivors of childhood low-grade glioma: a population-based study. Cancer 122:1261–1269
Kurozumi K, Nakano Y, Ishida J et al (2019) High-grade glioneuronal tumor with an ARHGEF2-NTRK1 fusion gene. Brain Tumor Pathol 36:121–128
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. International Agency for Research On Cancer, Lyon
Louis DN, Wesseling P, Aldape K et al (2020) cIMPACT-NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principal recommendations of the cIMPACT-Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading. Brain Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12832
Northcott PA, Pfister SM, Jones DT (2015) Next-generation (epi)genetic drivers of childhood brain tumours and the outlook for targeted therapies. Lancet Oncol 16:e293-302
Pujadas E, Chen L, Rodriguez FJ (2019) Pathologic and molecular aspects of anaplasia in circumscribed gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. Brain Tumor Pathol 36:40–51
Reuss DE, Mamatjan Y, Schrimpf D et al (2015) IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol 129:867–873
Ryall S, Tabori U, Hawkins C (2020) Pediatric low-grade glioma in the era of molecular diagnostics. Acta Neuropathol Commun 8:30
Tateishi K, Nakamura T, Yamamoto T (2019) Molecular genetics and therapeutic targets of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 36:74–83
Thom M, Blumcke I, Aronica E (2012) Long-term epilepsy-associated tumors. Brain Pathol 22:350–379
Wisoff JH, Sanford RA, Heier LA et al (2011) Primary neurosurgery for pediatric low-grade gliomas: a prospective multi-institutional study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Neurosurgery 68:1548–1554 (discussion 1554–1545)
Yoshimoto K, Hatae R, Sangatsuda Y et al (2017) Prevalence and clinicopathological features of H3.3 G34-mutant high-grade gliomas: a retrospective study of 411 consecutive glioma cases in a single institution. Brain Tumor Pathol 34:103–112
Zhang J, Wu G, Miller CP et al (2013) Whole-genome sequencing identifies genetic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Nat Genet 45:602–612
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Komori, T. The molecular framework of pediatric-type diffuse gliomas: shifting toward the revision of the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Brain Tumor Pathol 38, 1–3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00392-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00392-w