While the classifications of adult diffuse gliomas according to the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) were considerably updated in the 2016 revision (WHO2016CNS) based on the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion [6, 10], the classification of diffuse gliomas in children and adolescents has not been updated due to a lack of sufficient evidence to do so. The WHO2016CNS instead only gave these lesions tentative nomenclature, such as “pediatric diffuse astrocytoma” and “pediatric-type oligodendroglioma” as a boxed article [10].

The histopathological features of pediatric-type diffuse gliomas (pDGs) are generally non-specific, showing a wide range of variety with significant overlap. They also focally resemble circumscribed gliomas, such as pilocytic astrocytoma [1, 13] and glioneuronal tumors [7]. It is often difficult to determine whether a lesion is diffuse or circumscribed based on a small specimen [1]. The histological features also overlap with those of adult diffuse glioma, which requires conventional glioma regimens combined with chemoradiotherapy that may worsen the normal development of children [8]. Genetic alterations associated with pDG also show significant overlap not only within pDG but also across all gliomas. For instance, the BRAF V600E mutation, which is the most prevalent in pDG, may be present in adult malignant gliomas, such as epithelioid glioblastoma [10]. In addition to these difficulties, pDG may occur in adults, creating further confusion over the diagnosis and treatment of adult gliomas (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A schematic framework of pediatric- and adult-types diffuse gliomas. The orange triangles represent high-grade tumors, while the blue one represents low-grade tumors. Note that the pediatric type may occur in adults, and vice versa. IDH isocitrate dehydrogenase, Histone H3 histone H3 mutation, RAS/MAPK RAS, and MAP kinase pathway

To address such issues, the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW), which will presumably guide future CNS tumor classification, has proposed a novel molecularly oriented approach to the typing of pDG in its updates 4 [2] and 6 [11] (Table 1).

Table 1 Outline of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors

Compared to their adult counterpart, pDGs generally have a prolonged clinical course, even with incomplete resection [16, 18], and may cause long histories (often 2 years or more) of drug-resistant epilepsy; such tumors are thus referred to as long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) [17]. pDG often lacks genetic alterations common in adult-type gliomas, such as IDH mutations and 1p/19q codeletion, and harbor distinctive genetic features [14]. For example, low-grade lesions mainly in the cerebral hemisphere often induce alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway with a single genetic event [12, 20]. In contrast, the malignant ones, occurring in the midline structures, possess somatic mutations in genes encoding histone H3 isoforms, resulting in K27M mutations [5]. Some cerebral hemispheric high-grade gliomas may be associated with histone H3 G34V/R mutations [3, 19]. A unique example is a high-grade cerebral astrocytoma in infant that harbors receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusions, including those in the NTRK family [9, 20]. This tumor often develops as a large, cystic, circumscribed mass with neuronal differentiation and generally has a higher survival rate than seen in typical high-grade gliomas. Other diffuse cerebral high-grade gliomas with glioblastoma-like histology without IDH and H3 mutations can be grouped under the umbrella designation “diffuse pediatric-type high-grade gliomas.” Figure 2 shows the major histology and genetic alterations of pDG [4, 15].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Major histology and genetic alterations in pediatric-type diffuse gliomas. Tumor types shown in the larger font are the most common. Those in the smaller font are rare. H3 histone H3, FGFR1-TKD FGFR1-TKD fusion, MYB-QK1 MYB-QK1 fusion, MAPK MAP kinase pathway, wt wild type, and others represent mutations and alterations. For further details, see Jones, DTW [4] and Ryall, S [15]

In summary, pDGs need to be distinguished from their adult-type counterparts as their biological behavior and genetic background are significantly different. Unfortunately, a purely molecular approach is currently not always available in daily diagnostic practice, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, such an approach would be scientifically rational and certainly aid in ensuring an accurate diagnosis when only a small specimen is available. Although none of the genetic alterations associated with pDG are histologically or anatomically specific, each alteration’s prevalence conspicuously depends on the tumor’s histology and location. As such, sequential testing of genetic alterations based on the layered integrated approach while considering the histology, location, and genetic information is highly recommended.