Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrodynamics of the wind float OC3-Hywind with mooring loads estimated by the modular system

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, a modular system is preliminarily developed to estimate motion responses of wind floats with the quasi-static mooring loads in waves. The modular system consists of the hydrodynamic simulator and the BEM (Boundary Element Method) solver based on the 3D source-distribution method. Specifically, the hydrodynamic simulator can be divided into three modules, including body element module, constraint module and global reference frame module, respectively. Subsequently, an indicator, Response Amplitude Operator (RAO), is suggested to present the resonance frequencies of wind floats for determining stability and safety in the operational sea state. In addition, it can be used to realize the contribution of the mooring load to the six Degree-of-Freedom (6 DOF) motions at the resonance frequency, and be considered as the design concept of mooring lines. In case of the mooring load, our model results are reasonably in agreement with other published data of numerical simulations. Eventually, a modular system developed by the software, Simulink, would be compared to the present hydrodynamic models for verifying its capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Politis ES, Prospathopoulos J, Cabezon D, Hansen KS, Chaviaropoulos P, Barthelmie RJ (2012) Modeling wake effects in large wind farms in complex terrain: the problem, the methods and the issues. Wind Energy 15(1):161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonkman JM (2007) Dynamics modeling and loads analysis of an offshore floating wind turbine. University of Colorado at Boulder

  3. Lin YH, Fang MC (2012) An integrated approach for site selection of offshore wind-wave power production. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 37(4):740–755. https://doi.org/10.1109/Joe.2012.2201796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor PK, Yelland MJ (2001) The dependence of sea surface roughness on the height and steepness of the waves. J Phys Oceanogr 31(2):572–590. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0572:Tdossr>2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 4COffshore Global Offshore Wind Speeds Rankings. http://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/windspeeds.aspx

  6. Morison JR, Obrien MP, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. T Am I Min Met Eng 189:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nossen J, Grue J, Palm E (1991) Wave-forces on 3-dimensional floating bodies with small forward speed. J Fluid Mech 227:135–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209100006x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonkman JM, Buhl ML Jr (2005) FAST user’s guide. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No NREL/EL-500-38230

  9. Karimirad M (2011) Stochastic dynamic response analysis of spar-type wind turbines with catenary or taut mooring systems. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  10. Andersen MT, Hindhede D, Lauridsen J (2015) Influence of model simplifications excitation force in surge for a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines. Energies 8(4):3212–3224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Babarit A, Delhommeau G (2015) Theoretical and numerical aspects of the open source BEM solver NEMOH. In: 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC2015)

  12. Jonkman JM, Sclavounos PD (2006) Development of fully coupled aeroelastic and hydrodynamic models for offshore wind turbines. National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, Technical Report No NREL/C p-500-39066

  13. Lawson M, Garzon BB, Wendt F, Yu Y-H, Michelen C (2015) COER hydrodynamic modeling competition: Modeling the dynamic response of a floating body using the WEC-SIM and FAST simulation tools. In: ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V009T009A005–V009T009A005

  14. Lawson M, Yu Y-H, Ruehl K, Michelen C (2014) Development and demonstration of the WEC-Sim wave energy converter simulation tool. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Marine Energy Technology Symposium, Seattle, WA

  15. Karimirad M, Moan T (2011) Wave-and wind-induced dynamic response of a spar-type offshore wind turbine. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng 138(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aamo O, Fossen T (2001) Finite element modelling of moored vessels. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 7(1):47–75

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hooke R, Jeeves TA (1961) “Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems. J Assoc Comput Mach (ACM) 8(2):212–229

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Korvin-Kroukovsky BV, Jacobs WR (1957) Pitching and heaving motions of a ship in regular waves. Stevens Inst of Tech Hoboken NJ Experimental Towing Tank

  19. Fang M-C, Chen T-Y (2008) A parametric study of wave loads on trimaran ships traveling in waves. Ocean Eng 35(8–9):749–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wehausen JV, Laitone EV (1960) Surface waves. Fluid Dynamics/Strömungsmechanik. Springer, pp 446–778

  21. Hess JL, Smith A (1962) Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional bodies. Douglas Aircraft Co Long Beach CA

  22. Shen H-T, Farell C (1975) Numerical calculation of the wave integrals in the linearized theory of water waves. J Ship Res 21:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Telste J, Noblesse F (1986) Numerical evaluation of the Green function of water-wave radiation and diffraction. J Ship Res 30(2):69–84

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salvesen N, Tuck E, Faltinsen O (1970) Ship motions and sea loads. Trans SNAME 78(8):250–287

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inglis R, Price W (1981) A three-dimensional ship motion theory: comparison between theoretical predictions and experimental data of the hydrodynamic coefficients with forward speed. Trans RINA 124:141–157

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fang MC, Too GY (2006) The effect of side hull arrangements on the motions of the trimaran ship in waves. Nav Eng J 118(1):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang M-C, Chen R-Y (1998) Three-dimensional solution of the diffraction force on a ship in wave. In: The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers

  28. Cummins W (1962) The impulse response function and ship motions. David Taylor Model Basin Washington DC

  29. Fang M-C, Wang S-M, Mu-Chen W, Lin Y-H (2015) Applying the self-tuning fuzzy control with the image detection technique on the obstacle-avoidance for autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng 93:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhatta DD (2011) Computations of hydrodynamic coefficients, displacement-amplitude ratios and forces for a floating cylinder due to wave diffraction and radiation. Int J Non-Linear Mech 46(8):1027–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jonkman J (2010) Definition of the floating system for phase IV of OC3. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Statoil (2012) Hywind by statoil: the floating wind turbine. http://www.statoil.com/en/TechnologyInnovation/NewEnergy/RenewablePowerProduction/Offshore/Hywind/Downloads/Hywind_nov_2012.pdf

  33. Naess A, Moan T (2012) Stochastic dynamics of marine structures. Cambridge University Press

  34. Jonkman J, Musial W (2010) Offshore code comparison collaboration (OC3) for IEA task 23 offshore wind technology and deployment, vol 303. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen F, Hanson T, Skaare B (2006) Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. In: Proc 25th Int Conf Offshore Mech Arct Eng, Hamburg, OMAE2006-92291, pp 92671–92679

  36. Quallen S, Xing T, Carrica P, Li Y, Xu J (2014) CFD simulation of a floating offshore wind turbine system using a quasi-static crowfoot mooring-line model. J Ocean Wind Energy 1(3):143–152

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee C, Newman J (2006) WAMIT® User Manual, Versions 6.3, 6.3 PC, 6.3 S, 6.3 S-PC. WAMIT. Inc, Chestnut Hill, MA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shin H (2011) Model test of the OC3-Hywind floating offshore wind turbine. In: The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers

  39. Hong S, Lee I, Park SH, Lee C, Chun H-H, Lim HC (2015) An experimental study of the effect of mooring systems on the dynamics of a SPAR buoy-type floating offshore wind turbine. Int J Nav Arch Ocean 7(3):559–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their thanks to the Ministry of Science and Technology for a Grant under Contract No. MOST 106-2221-E-006-114. The authors also thank the great support for this work provided by International Wave Dynamics Research Center (IWDRC), National Cheng Kung University, for a Grant under Contract No. MOST 106-2911-I-006-301. The research was, in part, supported by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C. The aim for the Top University Project to the National Cheng Kung University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hsien Lin.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, YH., Hsu, CL. & Kao, SH. Hydrodynamics of the wind float OC3-Hywind with mooring loads estimated by the modular system. J Mar Sci Technol 24, 237–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0549-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0549-z

Keywords

Navigation